Main Article Content

Abstract

Learning loss has an impact on various problems, including misconceptions by students when recognizing and learning algebraic operations. This research aims to identify the profile of students' misconceptions in algebraic concepts as a consequence of learning loss due to the Covid-19 pandemic in public junior high school in Banda Aceh. The study adopts a quantitative approach. The population of the research consists of all eighth-grade students in public junior high school in Banda Aceh and the sample comprises 27 students from one of these schools. The sample was obtained through purposive sampling, selecting students from the top-ranked junior high school in Banda Aceh, known for having the highest average scores. Misconceptions were assessed using an online-based cognitive diagnostic test on algebraic concepts. Data analysis was conducted by examining the composition of misconceptions based on their types. The research findings indicate that the majority of students experience misconceptions, with 25.20% experiencing misconceptions in notation, 20.37% in generalization, 8.98% in understanding symbols, 9.97% in applying rules, 1.14% in notation and generalization, 0.57% in notation and understanding symbols, and 2% in generalization and applying rules. This study indicates a necessity to an analysis of the causes of misconceptions and efforts to minimize students' misconceptions in algebraic concepts, such as implementing cognitive conflict learning or remedial teaching.

Keywords

Algebraic expressions Student misconceptions Diagnostic test

Article Details

How to Cite
Aulia, D., Zubainur, C. M., & Khairunnisak, C. (2024). Profil Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v8i1.8278

References

  1. Abidin, Z., Mania, S., & Kusumayanti, A. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Aljabar Pada Siswa Kelas VII Dengan Menggunakan Three Tier Test Pada Materi Aljabar. Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.24252/ajme.v1i1.10930
  2. Agung Herutomo, R., & Mulyono Saputro, T. E. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan dan Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas VIII pada Materi Aljabar. Edusentris: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 1(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.17509/edusentris.v1i2.140
  3. Agustina, D. (2021). Hari Ini Sekolah di Banda Aceh Mulai Pembelajaran Tatap Muka. In Serambi Indonesia (Issue September).
  4. AL-Rababaha, Y., Yew, W. T., & Meng, C. C. (2020). Misconceptions in School Algebra. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 803–812. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i5/7250
  5. Cerelia, J. J., Sitepu, A. A., N, F. A. L., Pratiwi, I. R., Almadevi, M., Farras, M. N., Azzahra, T. S., & Toharudin, T. (2021). Learning Loss Akibat Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Seminar NASIONAL Statistik. http://semnas.statistics.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/erf_uploads/2021/11/Learning-Loss-Akibat-Pembelajaran-Jarak-Jauh-Selama-Pandemi-Covid-19-di-Indonesia.pdf
  6. CNN Indonesia. (2020). Survei KPAI: Guru tak Interaktif Selama Belajar dari Rumah. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200427160228-20-497716/survei-kpai-guru-tak-interaktif-selama-belajar-dari-rumah
  7. Gierl, M. J., Alves, C., & Taylor, R. (2010). Using the Attribute Hierarchy Method to Make Diagnostic Inferences about Examinees’ Knowledge and Skills in Mathematics: An Operational Implementation of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 10(4), 318–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.509554
  8. Kurniawati, A., & Sopiany, H. N. (2022). Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Menyederhanakan Operasi Perkalian dan Pembagian pada Bentuk Aljabar Menurut Teori Bruner. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika Dan Sains, 6(2), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v6i2.3614
  9. Kusaeri. (2012). Menggunakan Model Dina Dalam Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Untuk Mendeteksi Salah Konsepsi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i1.1118
  10. Muntikoh, N. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran Pencapaian Konsep Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meminimalisasi Miskonsepsi Matematika Siswa [Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah]. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/35264
  11. Resnick, L. ., Bill, V., Lesgold, S., & Leer, M. (1991). Thinking in arithmetic class. ERIC Clearinghouse. http://apling-spotlightproject.wikispaces.umb.edu/file/view/Unit+Development+Document+Resume.pdf
  12. Sari, H. M., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP pada Materi Operasi Hitung Bentuk Aljabar. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i3.511
  13. Sarlina. (2015). Miskonsepsi Siswa terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas X5 SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2015v3n2a5
  14. Savitri, M. E., Mardiyana, & Subanti, S. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Pecahan dalam Bentuk Aljabar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 2 Adimulyo Kabupaten Kebumen Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(4), 401–413.
  15. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.
  16. Utami, R. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Dan Cara Mengatasinya Pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar Kelas Vii-C Smp Negeri 13 Malang. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v3i1.2606
  17. Wahid, Haryoto, A., & Mirza, A. (2015). Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Operasi pada Bentuk Aljabar Kelas VII SMP Haebat Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v4i1.8519
  18. Wahyuni, T. N., Yusmin, E., & Suratman, D. (2016). Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Bentuk Akar di Kelas X SMKN 1 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24252/ajme