Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 20, 2020
Accepted
Nov 20, 2020
Published
Dec 11, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 571 Download : 933

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Study on munāsabah occupies an important position in the study of the Koran. Al-Biqā'î is one of the scholars who give a very large portion of the theory of munāsabah. Al-Biqā'î divides munāsabah into two major groups, namely, between surah (chapters) and between ayat (verses). With an exploratory-descriptive method, this paper will specifically explore logical pattern of munāsabah between surah according to al-Biqa'i with a comprehensive example. The findings of this paper are based on: first, there are four possible patterns of munāsabah between surah according to al-Biqa'i. The four patterns are munāsabah between surah’ names and its content, munāsabah between surah and basmalah, munāsabah between the initial description of the surahs and munāsabah between the end of the surah and the other surah. Second, al-Biqa'i in applying a munāsabah theory is quite consistent across patterns; from the first, second, third, and fourth patterns. Third, Munāsabah occupies a very important position because it is able to explain the unity and close relationship that exists between one surah and another while also emphasize the oneness of the Qur'anic themes.

Keywords

Al-Biqā’î Munāsabah Surah Consistent

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Abidin, A. Z., & Saddad, A. (2020). MUNÂSABAH BETWEEN CHAPTERS ON QUR’AN IN THE AL-BIQÂ’Î PERSPECTIVE. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 5(2), 345-363. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v5i2.1480

References

  1. Abidin, Thoriqul Aziz dan Ahmad Zainal. “Pendekatan Munasabah Psikologiah Muhammad Ahmad Khalafullah: Analisis Kisah Luth Dan Kaumnya Dalam Al-Qur’an,” Jurnal Nun 5 no.2 (2019): 151-183. http//10.32495/nun.v5i2.94.
  2. Affani, Syukron. “Diskursus Munāsabah: Problem Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Bi ’l-Qur’ān,” Jurnal Theologia 28, no. 2 (2017): 391-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo. 2017.28.2.1443.
  3. Ahmad, Suryadi dan Rudi. “Signifikansi MunāsabahAyat Al-Qur’an Dalam Tafsir Pendidikan.” Jurnal Ulul Al-Bab 17, no. 1 (2016).
  4. Al-‘A’zami, M.M. Sejarah Teks Al-Qur’an Dari Wahyu Sampai Kompilasi: Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Perjanjian Lama Dan Perjanjian Baru, 2014.
  5. Al-Biqa’i, Burhan al-Din. Nazm Al-Durar Fi Tsanasub Al-Ayat Wa Al-Suwar. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2006.
  6. Al-Biqa’i, Burhan al-Din Abi al-Hasan Ibrahim bin ’Umar. Nazm Al-Durar Al-Suwar, Fi Tanasub Al-Ayat Wa. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Islami, 1984.
  7. Al-Zarkasyi. Al-Burhan Fi ‘Ulum Al-Qur’An. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1957.
  8. Al-Zarqani, Muhammad ،Abd al-’Azim. Manahil Al-‘lrfan Fti‘Ulum Al- Qur’An. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1998.
  9. Badruzaman, Abad. Ulumul Qur’an: Pendekatan Dan Wawasan Baru. Malang: Madani Media, 2018.
  10. Bakar, Abu. “Kontekstualisasi MunāsabahPada Tafsir Mushaf Dan Tafsir Nuzuli: Analisis Komparatif Antara Afsir Tartib Al-Mushaf Dan Tafsir Tartib Al-Nuzul.” Jurnal Dialogia 14, no. 2 (2016).
  11. Fath, Amir Faishol. The Unity of Al-Qur’an, Terj. Nasiruddin Abbas. Jakarta: Pustaka Al- Kautsar, 2010.
  12. akim, Lukmanul. “MunāsabahAyat Dalam Surat Al-Naba’ (Analisis Metodologi Penafsiran Abdullah Darraz Dalam Kitab Al-Nabau Al-Azim Nazratun Jadidatun Fi Al-Qur’an).” Jurnal An-Nida 41, no. 2 (2017).
  13. Jabir, M. “Korelasi (Munasabah) Ayat Dan Surah Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Hunafa 3, no. 2 (2006).
  14. Khalifah, Haji. Kasyf Al-Zunun ‘an Asas Al-Kutub Wa Al-Funun, Dalam Amir Faishol Fath, The Unity or The Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2010.
  15. Mahfuz. “Analisis Al-MunāsabahFi Al-Qur’an; Antara Orientasi I’ja>z Dan Orientasi Wihdah.” Jurnal Tribakti 25, no. 1 (2014) 88-97 https://doi.org/10.33367/ tribakti.v25i1.161.
  16. Said, Hasani Ahmad. Diskursus MunāsabahAl-Quran Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2015.
  17. ———. “Menggagas Munāsabah Al-Qur’an: Peran Dan Model Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika 13, no. 1 (2016): 1- 34. https://doi.org/10.24239/ jsi.v13i1.412.1-34.
  18. ———. “Potret Studi Al-Qur’an Di Mata Orientalis,” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir 3 no. 1 (2018): 22-41. https://doi.org/10.32505/ tibyan. v3i1.474.
  19. ———. “Tafsir Al-Mishbah In The Frame Work Of Indonesian Golden Triangle Tafsirs: A Review On The Correlation Study (Munasabah) Of Quran.” Heritage Of Nusantara 3, no. 2 (2014): 212.
  20. Shihab, M Quraish, dkk. Sejarah Dan Ulum Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2001.
  21. Sherly Devani, Wawan Hernawan dan Izzah Faizah Siti R.K. “MunāsabahDalam Safwah Al-Tafasir Karya Muhammad ’ALi Al-Sabuni.” Jurnal Al-Bayan 2, no. 2 (2017).
  22. Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, Dan Aturan Yag Patut Anda Ketahui Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2015.
  23. Supriyanto, John. “MunāsabahAl-Qur’an; Studi Korelatif Antar Surat Bacaan Shalat-Shalat Nabi.” Jurnal Intizar 19, no. 1 (2013): 47-68
  24. Syukron, Affani. “Diskursus Munāsabah: Problem Tafsîr Al-Qur’ān Bi ’l-Qur’ān.” Jurnal Theologia 28, no. 2 (2017): 403.
  25. Yusuf, M. “MunāsabahDalam Al-Qur’an (Suatu Kajian Tentang I’jaz Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Tajdid 11, no. 2 (2012).
  26. Zayd, Nasr Hamid Abu. Mafhum Al-Nas: Dirasah Fi‘Ulum Al- Qur’an. Kairo: Dar al-Ihya al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1992.