Main Article Content
Abstract
The study of Dûrr al Asrār's interpretation epistemology by Mahmud Ibn Muhammad al Hamzawi is important because it has a special method that is rarely used by the majority, namely interpreting the Quran by using letters without dots. The use of this kind of interpretation seems to limit the interpreter in using the source of it and raises the hypothesis that this is a pure interpretation of bi al-ma 'qul. The focus of this study is to examine the sources, methods, and validity of interpretation. By descriptive analysis, this study concludes that the epistemological basis of Dûrr al Asrār by Mahmud Ibn Muhammad al Hamzawi is a combination of bi al-ma'tsur and bi al ma'qul, both of which dominate the language source, so this is called tafsir bi al-ma ' qul or bi al-ra'y. This method is globally and in lughawi and fiqhi styles. While the validity of Mahmud Ibn Muhamamd al-Hamzawi's interpretation after being tested with the theory of al-Asil wa al-Dakhil Abdul Wahab fayed, this is included in the authentic interpretation, both in the source of the interpretation and the object of al-Dakhil which is not in it.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Achmad, Danial. “Problematika Tafsir Bi al-Ra’y Dalam Lintas Mazhab dan Generasi”. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis 3 no. 2 (2013): 204-210. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir. 2013.3.2.190-219.
- Afroni, Sihabuddin. “Teknik Interpretasi dalam Tafsir al-Qur’an dan Potensi Deviasi Penerapannya Menurut Ilmu Dakhil”. Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 3 no. 1 (2018):69-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.30868/at.v3i01.256.
- Alwi HS, Muhammad. “Epistemologi Tafsir: Mengurai Relasi Filsafat dengan al-Qur’an”. Jurnal: Substantia 21 no. 1 (2019): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ substantia.v21i1.4687.
- Anggoro, Taufan. “Tafsir Alquran Kontemporer: Kajian atas Tafsir Tematik-Kontekstual Ziauddin Sardar”. Al Quds: Jurnal Studi Al Qur’an dan Hadis 3 no. 2 (2019):199- 220. http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v3i2.1049.
- Ba’asyien, Moh Arsyad. “Tafsir Bi al-Ra’yi Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Penafsiran al-Qur’an”. Jurnal: Hunafa Vol. 2, 2. 2005.
- Badruzaman, Dudi. “Perkembangan Paradigma Epistemologi dalam Filasafat Islam”. Jurnal: IDEA Jurnal Humaniora 2 no. 1 (2019) : 52-64. https://doi.org/ 10.29313/idea.v0i0.4263.
- Commins, David Dean. Islamic Reform: Politics and Social Change in Late Ottoman Syria. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
- Dhahabi (al), Muhammad Husayn. al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.
- Dozen, Welly. “Analisis Pergesaran Shifting Paradigm Penafsiran: Studi Komparatif Tafsir Era Klasik dan Kontemporer”. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 5 no.1 (2020): 38-56. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v5i1.1631.
- Dozen, Welly. “Epistemologi Tafsir Klasik: Studi Analisis Pemikiran Ibnu Katsir”. Falasifa: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 10 no.2 (2019): 147-159. https://doi.org/ 10.36835/falasifa.v10i2.203.
- Gusmian, Islah. “Epistemologi Tafsir al-Qur’an Kontemporer”. Jurnal: al-A’raf Vol. 12, 2. 2015.
- Hamzawi (al), Mahmud ibn Muhammad. Durr al-Asrar fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an bi al-Huruf al-Muhmalah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 2011.
- Junaidi, Rofiq. “Al-Ashil wa Dakhil fi Tafsir”. Al-A’raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat 11 no. 2 (2014): 67-87. 10.22515/ajpif.v11i2.1192.
- Mishaqa, Mikhayil. Murder, Mayhem, Pillage and Plunder: The History of the Lebanon in the 18th and 19th Centuries. terj. Wheeler M Thackston. New York: SUNY Press, 1988.
- Mutakin, Ali. “Kaidah Kebahasaan dalam Kajian Tafsir”. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 1 no. 2 (2016): 79-90. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan. v1i2.1594.
- Ni’mah, Siar.“Al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir: Studi atas Penafsiran Esoterik Ayat-ayat Imamah Husein al-Tabataba’i dalam Tafsir al-Mizan”. KACA: Karunia Cahaya Allah Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin 9 no. 1 (2019): 44-66. https://doi.org/ 10.36781/kaca.v9i1.3009.
- Parwanto, Wendi. “Struktur Epistemologi Naskah Tafsir Surat al-Fatihah Karya Muhammad Basiuni Imran Sambar Kalimantan Barat”. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 4 no.1 (2019): 143- 163. https://doi.org/ 10.32505/tibyan.v4i1.78.3.
- Permana, Aramdhan Kodrat. “Sumber-sumber Penafsiran al-Qur’an”. Jurnal At-Tatbiq: Jurnal al-Ahwal as-Syakhsiyyah 5 no.1 (2020): 73-103.
- Schilcher, Linda Schatkowski. Families in Politics: Damascene Factions and Estates of the 18th and 19th Centuries. Stuggart: Steiner-Verlag-Wiesbaden, 1985.
- Syafrijal. “Tafsir Lughawi”. Al-Ta’lim Journal 20 no. 2 (2013): 421-430. https://doi. org/10. 15548/jt.v20i2.39.
- Ulinnuha, Muhammad. “Konsep al-Ashil wa al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir al-Qur’an”. Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 21 no. 2 (2017): 127-144. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.29300/madania.v21i2.582.
- Zaini, Muhammad.“Sumber-sumber Penafsiran al-Qur’an”. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Ushuludin 14 no. 1 (2012): 29-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/substantia. v14i1.4856.
- Zulfikar, Ahmad Zainal Abidin dan Eko. “Epistemologi Tafsir al-Jami’ Li Ahkam al-Qur’an Karya al-Qurthubi”. Kalam 11 no. 2 (2017): 489-522. https://doi.org/ 10.24042/klm.v11i2.1326.
- Zulfikar, Eko dan Ahmad Zaenal Abidin. “Ikhtilaf al-Mufassirin: Memahami Sebab-sebab Perbedaan Ulama dalam Penafsiran al-Qur’an”. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2019): 285-306. https://doi.org/10.32505/ tibyan.v4i2.859.
- Zulfikar, Eko. “Memperjelas Epistemologi Tafsir Bi Al-Ma’tsur: Aplikasi Contoh Penafsiran dalam Jami’ al-Bayan karya al-Tabari”. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir 4 no.1 (2019): 120- 142. https://doi.org/10.32505/ tibyan.v4i1.835.