Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to critically explain the method of al-Tafsīr al-Tauḥīdī by Ḥasan al-Turābī and its position amongst other thematic commentary theories. This study is a descriptive qualitative study by employing content analysis theory. The results indicate the trend of al-Tafsīr al-Tauḥīdī in two meanings. The first is as a commentary paradigm which leans on the unity of man and the universe in the message of the God’s revelation. The second is as the form of thematic commentary of al-Waḥdah al-Mauḍū‘iyyah model. Therefore, this commentary is more appropriately categorized into al-Tafsīr al-Muṣhafī bi al-Waḥdah al-Mauḍū’iyyah. It has three systematic explanation in each surah including Khulāṣah Hady al-Sūrah, Tartīl al-Ma’āni, and Umūm al-ma’āni. Al-Turābī's ability to unite various related elements in his commentary is not only between verses or surahs but also between human life and all its activities with the universe in a bond of al-Qur'an guidance which is core to monotheism. This is the advantage it has and is a new method in commentary literacy in Sudan. In fact, the method of al-Tafsīr al-Tauḥīdī generally becomes a framework for the whole civilization project of al-Turābī. However, there are some critics towards his commentary regarding rationality and rejection of several authentic hadiths which seem to leave riwāyah in the commentary of the Qur’an.

Keywords

Sudan Literacy Tafsir Ḥasan al-Turābī Tafsīr Al-Tauḥīdī

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasan, M. A. K. (2021). THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LITERACY OF QUR’ᾹNIC INTERPRETATIONS IN SUDAN: CRITICAL STUDY OF THE AL-TAFSĪR AL-TAUḤĪDĪ. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 6(1), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v6i1.1909

References

  1. Ahmad, Al-Amin HaJ Muhammad. Munāqasyah Al-Hādi`ah Li Ba’d Afkār Al-Duktūr Al-Turābi. Makaz al-Shaf al-Iliktruni, 1995.
  2. Al-Ghazāli, Muhammad. Nahwa Tafsīr Al-Maudhu’i Li Suar Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 1995.
  3. al-Sayyid Muhammad al-Bāqir al-Ṣadr. Muqaddimāt Fī Al-Tafsīr Al-Maudhū’i Lī Al-Qur’ān. Kuwait: Dār al-Taujīh al-Islāmi, 1980.
  4. Al-Turābī, Ḥasan. Al-Tafsīr Al-Tauhīdī. Vol. 1. Bairut, Libanon: Dār al-Sāqi, 2004.
  5. ———. Al-Tafsīr Al-Tauhīdī. 2nd ed. Bairut, Libanon: Dār al-’Arabiah li al-’Ulūm Nāsyirūn, 2011.
  6. Ariski Aznor. “Kepentingan Mesir Menolak Meratifikasi Kesepakatan Cooperation Framework Agreement (CFA) Mengenai Aturan Pengelolaan Sungai Nil.” JOM FISIP VOL 2 NO 2 OKTOBER 2015 53, no. 9 (1981): 1689–99.
  7. Bazmul, Muh}ammad bin Sālim. Taḥrīr Fī Al-Tafsīr Al-Mauḍū’i Wa Al-Waḥdah Al-Mauḍū’iyyah Li Al-Surah. Saudi Arabia: Kuliyyah al-Da’wah wa Ushuluddin Jamiah Ummul Qura, n.d. https://www.radiosunna.com/uploads/6/6/1/7/6617650/
  8. تحرير_التفسير_الموضوعي_والوحدة_الموضوعية.pdf.
  9. Berridge, W. J. Hasan Al-Turabi: Islamist Politics and Democracy in Sudan. Hasan Al-Turabi: Islamist Politics and Democracy in Sudan, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848449.
  10. Berridge, W J, and Hasan Islamist. “Reviews of Books The Spectre of Hasan Al-Turabi and Political Islam in Sudan” 89, no. May (2019): 398–401.
  11. Cahyanti, Putri. “Analisis Konflik Sudan Dan Sudan Selatan.” Journal of International Relations 3 (2017): 84–95. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/jihi.
  12. Fathina, Rasyidah. “Mahmoud Muhamed Taha: Redefinisi Konsep Nasakh Sebagai Pembentuk Syariat Humanis.” Jurisdictie, 2012, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.18860/ j.v0i0.1593.
  13. Hasan, Moh. Abdul Kholiq. “Freedom Of Religion In Rashid Rida ’ S Rasyid Ridha and Al Manar Tafsir Freedom of Religion in Perspective of Rasyid Ridha ’ s Tafsir.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR) 137, no. Icqhs 2017 (2018): 56–59. http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
  14. ———. “Interfaith Tolerance and Its Relevance to the Indonesian Diversity: A Study on Ibn ʿĀshūr’s Al-Taḥrīr Wa Al-Tanwīr.” Ulumuna 22, no. 2 (2018): 333–62. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v22i2.301.
  15. ———. Kaidah Kaidah Tafsir Al-Qur’ān. Sukoharjo: EFUDE PRESS IAIN Surakarta, 2013.
  16. Hatta, Moh. “Pemikiran Hukum Islam Hasan Al-Turabi.” Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi, Dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2015): 189–99.
  17. Hayati. “Perbandingan pendidikan antara negara mesir dan sudan.” SERAMBI TARBAWI Jurnal Studi Pemikiran, Riset Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam 01, no. 02 (2013): 395–412.
  18. Helmy, Muhammad Irfan. “Kesatuan Tema Dalam Al-Qur’ān (Telaah Historis-Metodologis Tafsir Maudhu’iy).” Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 19, no. 2 (2020): 64–80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v19i2.3589.
  19. Ibrahim, Esam Eltigani Mohamed and Zain, Ibrahim Mohamed. “Hasan Al-Turabi ’ s Approach to Qur ’ ā Nic Exegesis.” Intellectual Discourse, IIUM Press 22, no. 1 (2014): 53–71. http://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php...
  20. Jabaly, Ali. “Al-Fikr ’Inda Al-Turābiy; Qirā`ah Fī Muqaddimah Al-Tafsīr Al-Tauhīdy,” 2019. https://omran.org/ar/الفكر-التوحيدي-عند-الترابي?language=en.
  21. Kadir, Abdul. “Dakwah Dan Pembaharuan Pendidikan Islam Syaikh Ahmad Surkati.” Jurnal Da’wah: Risalah Merintis, Da’wah Melanjutkan 2, no. 02 (2020): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.38214/jurnaldawahstidnatsir.v2i02.54.
  22. Karim, Abdul. “Tafsir At-Tauhîdi Karya Hasan At-Turâbi: Selingkung Baru Dalam Tafsir.” Hermeneutik 13, no. 1 (2019): 34. https://doi.org/10.21043/hermeneutik. v13i1.5553.
  23. Khilmi Hidayatulloh, Miftah. “Konsep Dan Metode Tafsir Tematik (Studi Komparasi Antara Al-Kumi Dan Mushthofa Muslim).” Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an Dan Tafsir 3, no. 2 (2019): 130–42. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v3i2.4116.
  24. Khoir, Tholkhatul. “Titik Temu Pemikiran Mahmoud Mohamed Thaha Dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 18, no. 1 (2017): 65. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.17.1.1746.
  25. Kumsa, A. “South Sudan Struggle for Independence, and It’s Implications for Africa.” RUDN Journal of Sociology 17, no. 4 (2017): 513–23. https://doi.org/10.22363/ 2313-2272-2017-17-4-513-523.
  26. Makmun-Abha, Muhammad. “Kajian Kritis Atas Kitab Al-Tafsīr Al-Tawhīdī Karya Hāsan Al-Turābī.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur`an Dan Hadis 15, no. 1 (2014): 2014.
  27. Mas’adah. “Epistemologi Pembaharuan Usul Fikih Hasan Turabi.” Jurnal Mahkamah 2, no. 1 (2017): 59. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v2i1.78.
  28. Muhammad Abū Syuhbah. Al-Isrāiliyyāt Wa Al-Maudhu’āt Fī Kutub Al-Tafsīr. Kairo: Maktabah al-Sunnah, 1987.
  29. Munawir. “The New Development Of Ulumul Qur ’ an ( The Methodological Studies of Asbab Al- Nuzul ).” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 5, no. 1 (2017): 74–89. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.
  30. Muslim, Musthafa. Mabāḥis Fī Al-Tafsīr Al-Mauḍū’i. Damaskus Syiria: Dār al-Fikr, 2000.
  31. Nadhirah, Wardah. “Hermeneutika Al-Qur’ān Muhammad Al-Ghazali (Telaah Metodologis Atas Kitab Nahwa Tafsir Maudhu’i Li Suwar Al-Qur’ān Al-Karim).” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’ān Dan Hadis 15, no. 2 (2016): 237. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.15203.
  32. Novyanti, Mira. “Reformasi Ushŭl Fikih Menurut Hasan Al-Turâbî Dan Kontribusi Pemikirannya Terhadap Dinamika Pemikiran Hukum Islam Kontemporer.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Antasari Banjarmasin, 2017. http://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/id/eprint/9121.
  33. Ridlo, Ubaid. “Sinonim Dan Antonim Dalam Al-Quran.” Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 9, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24042/ albayan.v9i2.2253.
  34. Supriadi, Cecep. “Relasi Islam Dan Negara: Wacana Keislaman Dan Keindonesiaan.” KALIMAH 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 217. https://doi.org/10.21111/ klm.v13i1.285.
  35. Taufiq, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Naim Tentang Dekontruksi Syari’ah Sebagai Sebuah Solusi.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 20, no. 2 (October 2, 2018): 145. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.20.2.4044.
  36. Wahiduddin. “Konflik Sudan Dan Jatuhnya Rezim Presiden Omar Bashir.” Nady Al-Adab 17, no. 1 (2020).
  37. Zain, Ibrahim Mohamed. “Al-Fan Wa Qaḍāyā Al-Hawiyyah Al-Sudāniyyah: Qirā`ah Ta`wīliyyah Fī Manhaj Al-Tafsīr Al-Tauḥidī.” Al-Tajdīd 20, no. 39 (2016): 249–81.