Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 18, 2021
Accepted
Dec 25, 2021
Published
Dec 29, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 183 Download : 111

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses the tendency of Tafsīr 'Ilmī in Imam Suyuti's interpretation of the plague verses. Interestingly, as a classical commentator, he interprets the plague verses in his commentary books using the traditions of the Prophet (naqli), but he explains about the plague in addition to his commentary books by referring to the interpretation of the plague verses which are supported by scientific data. To analyze the tendency of this interpretation (ittijāh al-tafsīr), the researcher uses the theory of scientific interpretation. This research is qualitative in nature and uses content analysis methods, especially the istiqra (inductive) method. The istiqra method is used to analyze his interpretation of the plague verses that are spread in his commentaries and his books on epidemics and medicine. The purpose of this study is to reveal the indications of the trend of scientific interpretation explored by Imam Suyūt}ī in his books on epidemics and medicine by referring to his interpretations in his commentary books, so this research is urgent to confirm the historical roots and dynamics of Tafsīr 'Ilmī, whose epistemological tendency has emerged in the era of classical scholars. The results of this study are, first, in general, the method of interpretation of Imam Suyūt}ī is bi al-ma'ṣūr. Second, Imam Suyūtī's interpretation of the plague verses in Ṭā'ūn and medical themed books tends to 'Ilmi' Tafsir in terms of a more scientific explanation of the narrations that are in accordance with science, medical and socio-historical. Third, the scientific tendency in Imam Suyūt}ī's interpretation is in historical and medical.

Keywords

plague verses ṭā'ūn scientific interpretation ittijāh al-tafsīr

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Zaeni, A., Muiz, A., & Hajar, S. (2021). AL-SUYŪṬĪ WA ITTIJᾹHᾹTUH ILᾹ AL-TAFSĪR AL-‘ILMĪ DIRᾹSAH ‘ALᾹ TAFSĪR ᾹYᾹT AL-WABᾹ. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 6(2), 204-220. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v6i2.3287

References

  1. ‘Abd al-Raḥmān, Ibn. Al-Baḥs| al-‘Ilmī Ḥaqīqatuh wa Mas|adiruh wa Māddatuh, Mahāhijuh wa Kitābatuh wa Tiba’ah wa Munāqasah. Maktanah al-‘Ubaikan, 2012.
  2. Abtawī, Muhammad. Dirasah al-Wabā’ wa Subul al-Taharruz minh al-Aubiah fi al-Ṭibb al-’Arabī wa fī al-Tārīkh al-Ṡaqāfī wa al-Ijtimā’i. Al-Markaz al-’Arabī li al-Abḣas| wa Dirāsah al-Siyāsat, 2020.
  3. ‘Ᾱdil Ibnī ‘Al al-Syidī. Al-Tafsīr al-‘Ilmī li al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Jużūruh wa Taṭbīqātuh wa al-Mawqif minhu. Riyad: Dār al-Watan li al-Naysr, 2010.
  4. Akbar, Ahmad Fadly Rahman. “Mafhūm Yūsuf al-Qaradāwī ‘An al-Tafsīr al-‘Ilmī (Dirāsah fi al-Jānib al-Untūlūjī)”. Studia Islamika Jurnal Studi Quran 4 no. 2 (2019): 247-263. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v4i2.3816
  5. Al-‘Abidīn Mūsā al-Ja’far, Zain, “wa Ᾱkharūn, Waba’ al-Ṫā’ūn fī al-Islām wa Iṣābah al-Masyhūrīn bih ḥattā Nihāyah al-‘Aṣr al-Umawī”. Majallah Jāmi’ah al-Karbalā’ al-‘Ilmiyah 8, no. 1 (2010): 104-114.
  6. Al-Khūlī, Ᾱmīn. Manāhij Tajdīd fī al-Nah}w wa al-Balāgah wa al-Tafsīr wa al-Ᾱdab, Tab’ah 1. Bidūn al-Makān: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1961.
  7. Al-Rumi, Fahd. Ittijāhat al-Tafsīr fī al-Qarn al-Rābi’ ‘Asyar al-Hijrī, Juz 2. Riyad: Mu’assasah al-Risalah. 1997.
  8. Al-Qādir al-'Idrūs. 'Abd, al-Nūr al-Sāfir ‘an Akhbār al-Qarn al-‘Ᾱsyir, Ta’līq Aḥmad Hālū wa Gairuh, Tab’ah 1. Bairūt: Dār Ṣādir, 2001.
  9. Ᾱyāzī. Al-Mufassirūn Ḥayātuhum wa Manhajuhum. Tihirān: Wuzārah al-Saqāfah wa al-Irsyād al-Islāmi, 1212 H.
  10. Fadly Rahman Akbar, Ahmad, wa ‘Abdul Ramli Hasan. “Mafhūm Yūsuf al-Qarad}āwī ‘An al-Tafsīr al-‘Ilmī (Dirāsah fi al-Jānib al-Untūlūjī)”. Studia Islamika Jurnal Studi Quran, 4, no. 2 (2019). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/studiquran. v4i2.3816.
  11. Firmansyah, Rizki. “Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia: History, Paradigm and Dynamics of Interpretation”. Insyirah Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Studi Islam 4, no. 1, (2021): 29 – 40.
  12. Hajar al-‘Asqalānī, Ibn, Bazl al-Ma’un. Tahqīq Aḥmad ‘Iṣām ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Kātib. al-Riyād: Dār al-‘Ᾱṣimah, bi dūn al-sanah, t.t.
  13. Hasan ‘Abbas, Faḍl. Al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn Asāsiyatuh wa al-Ittijāhatuh wa Manāhijuh fi ‘Uṣr al-Ḥadiṡ, Juz 1. ‘Ammān: Dār al-Nafāis li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzi’, 2015.
  14. Hisyām, Ibn, dan Muh}ammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Mālik. Al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyah, Ta’līq Muhammad ibn Aḥmad Ḥusain al-Khatīb. Beirūt: Dar al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, 1990.
  15. Husain al-Żahabī, Muhammad. Al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn, al-Juz al-Awwal. Al-Qāhirah: Maktabah Wahbiyah, bi dūn al-sanah.
  16. Mahallī, Al, wa al-Suyūtī. Tafsīr al-Jalālain, Tahqīq Fakhr al-Dīn Qafāwah. Beirūt: Maktabah Lebanon Nāsyirūn, 2003.
  17. Niẓām al-Dīn Najm al-Dīn, Nūr. “Al-Isyārāt al-‘Ilmiyah fī Surah al-Naḥl Dirāsah fī al-Tafsīr al-‘Ilmi”. Majallah al-Ᾱdab, no. 120 (2018): 165-178.
  18. Sa’īd Mūsā, Muhammad. ‘Uzamā al- Islām ‘Abr Arba’ah Qarna min al-Zamān, Tab’ah 4. Al-Qāhirah: Mu’assasah Iqra’, 2005.
  19. Supriadi, Ahmad. “Integrating Qur’an and Science: Epistemology of Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia” Jurnal Refleksi 16, no. 2, (2017): 149–186. DOI: 10.15408/ref. v16i2.10191
  20. Suyūtī, Al. Al-Durr al-Manṡūr fi al-Tafsīr al-Ma’ṡūr, Juz 1. Beirūt: Lebanon, 2011.
  21. _________. Al-Durr al-Manṡūr fi al-Tafsīr al-Ma’ṡūr, Juz 3. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 2011.
  22. _________. Al-Durr al-Manṡūr fi al-Tafsīr al-Ma’ṡūr, Juz 4. Beirūt: Lebanon, 2011.
  23. _________. Husn al-Muhādarah fī Tarīkh Misr wa al-Qāhirah, Tahqīq Muhammad al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, Juz 1. Bi dūn al-Makān: Dār Ihyā al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyah, bi dūn al-Sanah.
  24. _________. Al-Iklīl fī Istinbāt} al-Tanzīl. Bi dūn al-Makān: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabi, bi dūn al-sanah.
  25. _________. Al-Raḥmah fī al-Ṭibb wa al-Ḥikmah, bi dūn al-Makān. Dār Ihyā’ al-Kutub. Bi dūn al-sanah.
  26. _________. Al-Tahdduṡ bi Ni’mah Allāh Ta’āla. Bi dūn al-Makān wa al-Maṭba’ah wa al-sanah.
  27. _________. Ma Rawāhu al-Wā’un fi Akhbār al-Tā’un, Ta’liq Muhammad ‘Alī al-Bar. Dimasyq: Dar al-Qalam, bi dun al-sanah.
  28. _________. Maqāmāt al-Suyuti, Tahqiq ‘Abd al-Gaffār Sulaimān al-Bandiri wa Muhammad Sa’id Basuni Galul. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1986.
  29. _________. Mu’tarak al-Aqrān fī ‘Ijāz al-Qur’ān. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1988.
  30. _________. Qatf al-Azhār fī Kasyf al-Asrār, Juz 1. Qatr: Wuzārah al-Awqāf wa al-Syu’ūn al-Islāmiyah, 1994.
  31. Tri Handayani, Rina, dkk, “Pandemi Covid 19 Respon Imun Tubuh dan Herd Immunity”. Jurnal Ilmiah Permas: Jurnal Ilmiah STIKES Kendal 10, no. 3 (2020): 373-380.
  32. Yūsuf al-Syarbajī, Ah}mad. Al-Suyūt}ī wa Juhūduh fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān, Tab’ah 1. Dimasyq: Dār al-Maktabī, 2001 .
  33. Wādih al-Hasyimī, Ibn. Manhajiyah ‘Idād Buḥūṡal-Dirasāt al-‘Ulya. Jāmi’ah Muhammad Bi Wadaif al-Msilah, 2016.
  34. Zubaidi Saleh, Sujiat. “Epistemologi Penafsiran Ilmiah al-Qur’an”. Jurnal Tsaqafah 7, no 1 (2011): 109-132.