Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 29, 2022
Accepted
Dec 27, 2022
Published
Dec 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 149 Download : 110

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the misconception of religious moderation in the theological discourse of the cross in the Qur'an by using the interpretations of Quraish Shihab and Wahbah az-Zuhaily in QS. An-Nisa' verse 157. This verse is considered an accusation against the death of Jesus, and the Jews consider crucifixion as a form of humiliation that Jesus had to experience as a social disturbance. This study aims to analyze the interpretation of Quraish Shihab and Wahbah az-Zuhaily about the theology of the cross in QS. An-Nisā' verse 157 and the exclusive values in their interpretation. This article is a literature review using the thematic method and a critical analysis approach to its interpretation. This study found that the interpretation of this two mufassir did not contain moderation values in their content, giving rise to an exclusive attitude in their interpretation. Meanwhile, this diversity in diversity is a challenge as well as a problem that must have a solution.

Keywords

Misconception Religious Moderation Theology of the Salib

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hayati, S. M. (2022). MISCONCEPTIONS OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION IN THE THEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE OF THE SALIB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATIONS OF QURAISH SHIHAB AND WAHBAH AZ-ZUHAILY. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 7(2), 260-275. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v7i2.4376

References

  1. Arisah, Yuni, dan Nurma Yunita. “Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Moderasi Beragama dalam Al-Qur’an surah al-Baqarah ayat 143 dan 256,” t.t.
  2. Budiono, Arif. “Moderasi Beragama Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Kajian Tafsir Surat Al-Baqarah: 143.” JADID 01, no. 01 (2021).
  3. Chuzaimah, Ibnu, dan Afroh Nailil Hikmah. “Moderasi Beragama: Urgensi dan Kondisi Keberagamaan di Indonesia.” Al-Fikr : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 8, no. 1 (2022). http://jurnal.tarbiyah.stainsorong.ac.id/index.php/al-fikr.
  4. Darman, Andrianus. “Yesus Sungguh Allah, Sungguh Manusia. Tinjauan Teologis Menurut Perspektif Islam dan Katolik,” t.t.
  5. Dawing, Darlis. “Mengusung Moderasi Islam Di Tengah Masyarakat Multikultural.” Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Ushuluddin dan Filsafat 13, no. 2 (5 Februari 2018): 225–55. https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v13i2.266.
  6. Fahri, Mohamad, dan Ahmad Zainuri. “Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia” 25, no. 2 (2019).
  7. Forum Peace #18: Teologi Salib Tafsir 4: 157 oleh Budhy Munawwar Rachman dan Andreas Jonathan. Forum Zoom, 2022.
  8. Ghozali, Mahbub, dan Derry Ahmad Rizal. “Tafsir Kontekstual Atas Moderasi Dalam Al-Qur’an: Sebuah Konsep Relasi Kemanusiaan.” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat 17, no. 1 (30 Juni 2021): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam. v17i1.2717.
  9. Hanafi, Imam. “Eksklusivisme, Inklusivisme, Dan Pluralisme: Membaca Pola Keberagamaan Umat Beriman.” Al-Fikra : Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman 10, no. 2 (1 Agustus 2017): 388. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v10i2.3848.
  10. Indriana, Nilna. “Common Word Dalam Tiga Agama Samawi: Islam, Kristen Dan Yahudi ( Sebuah Dialog Antar Agama Menuju Titik Temu Teologis),” t.t., 13.
  11. Izzan, Ahmad. “Pergeseran Penafsiran Moderasi Beragama Menurut Tafsir Al-Azhar Dan Tafsir Al-Misbah.” Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (31 Desember 2021). https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v6i2.17714.
  12. Janah, Nasitotul. “Merumuskan Kembali Teologi Hubungan Lintas Agama Di Tengah Pengalaman Kemajemukan (Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Ayat Makkiyyah dan Madaniyyah)” 7, no. 1 (2016): 25.
  13. Karmel, Iwan. “Teologi Salib Kristus,” 2017. https://www.academia.edu/35366984/ Teologi_Salib_Kristus.
  14. Mabrur, Mabrur. “Moderasi al-Qur’an dan Penafsiran Kontemporer: Analisis Pemikiran Wahbah Zuhaili dan Relevansinya dalam Konteks Indonesia Modern.” Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Keislaman 1, no. 2 (14 Oktober 2019): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v1i2.9.
  15. Noorsena, Bambang. Menuju Dialog Teologi Kristen-Islam Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2001.
  16. Putra, Adi, dan Charisal B.S. Manu. “Analisis Kritis Terhadap Kristologi Dalam Islam.” BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 2, no. 1 (22 Juni 2021): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v2i1.53.
  17. Santoso, Gabrielle Florencia. “Sebuah Pembelaan Terhadap Tuduhan Islam Mengenai Fakta Kematian Yesus.” CONSILIUM: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan, 2020.
  18. Shihab, M Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah (Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur’an). Cetakan IV. Jilid 02. Ciputat, Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2005.
  19. ———. Wasathiyyah. Tangerang Selatan: Lentera Hati, 2020.
  20. Solihan Mahdum, Cahyana. Perspektif Islam Terhadap Kristologi. Solo: PT Tiga Serangkai, 2008.
  21. Syamsuri. Tafsir di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2021.
  22. ———. Tafsir di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2021.
  23. Thalib, Abdullah. “Konsep Persamaan Dalam Islam (Perspektif Teologi Sosial)” 13 (2019).
  24. Tim Penyusun Kementrian Agama RI. Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementrian Agama RI, t.t.
  25. Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa, 2008.
  26. Ulinnuha, Muhammad, dan Mamluatun Nafisah. “Moderasi Beragama Perspektif Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, Hamka, Dan Quraish Shihab.” SUHUF 13, no. 1 (22 Juni 2020): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v13i1.519.
  27. Zuhaili, Wahbah. Tafsir Al-Munir (Akidah, Syariah, Manhaj). Jilid 03. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2016.
  28. Zuhaily, Wahbah Az. Tafsir Al-Munir (Akidah, Syariah, Manhaj). Jilid 3. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2016.