Main Article Content

Abstract

The position of penghulu holds a strategic role in the administration of Islamic family law in Indonesia. Although existing state regulations do not explicitly restrict this position based on gender, women’s participation as penghulu remains limited, indicating a gap between legal norms and institutional practice. This research aims to examine the position of female penghulu by clarifying the conceptual distinction between penghulu as an administrative state office and wali hakim as a judicial-religious authority, a distinction that is often blurred in policy implementation and public perception. This study employs a qualitative literature-based approach using normative-critical analysis grounded in legal feminism. The analysis is supported by Buya Husein Muhammad’s gender-responsive Islamic thought and Prof. Hasbi As-Shiddiqi’s concept of Indonesian fiqh, which emphasizes contextual and sociological considerations in Islamic legal interpretation. The findings reveal that obstacles to women’s participation as penghulu do not stem from Islamic legal prohibitions, but rather from public policy designs that conflate administrative and judicial functions, as well as from entrenched patriarchal social constructions. From a fiqh perspective, penghulu is not a pillar (rukun) of marriage, and therefore there is no normative basis requiring the position to be held exclusively by men. Furthermore, female penghulu contribute significantly to premarital education and the protection of women’s rights within marriage. This study concludes that gender-responsive reform in penghulu policy is essential to promoting inclusive, just, and contextually grounded Islamic family law services in Indonesia. Such reform has important implications for strengthening legal certainty, enhancing gender equality, and improving the quality of public religious services within the framework of national Islamic law administration.

Keywords

Female penghulu Islamic family law Gender equality Legal feminism

Article Details

How to Cite
Susantin, J., Palevi, Y., Khotimah, W. D., & Izzuddin, A. (2025). Gender, Authority, and Islamic Legal Administration: Rethinking Women’s Eligibility as Penghulu in Indonesia. At-Tafkir, 18(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.32505/at.v18i2.10327

References

  1. Alfiani, N., & Anggraini, N. (2023). The theory and practice of legal feminism: Examining its impact on the representation of women in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i1.3
  2. Amar, R., Dharma, A. P., Urrahman, M. A., & Kurniawan, M. R. (2024). Kedudukan pencatatan terhadap keabsahan perkawinan: Telaah pencatatan perkawinan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 5(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v5i2.486
  3. Aminuddin, H., Mamun, T. N., Dienaputra, R. D., & Sudjana, U. (2019). The function and position of penghulu in Raffles’ Kitab Hukum manuscript (1814). Journal of Indonesian Islam, 13(1), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2019.13.1.177-199
  4. Barus, Z. (2013). Analisis filosofis tentang peta konseptual penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum sosiologis. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.2.212
  5. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
  6. Blackwood, E. (2001). Representing women: The politics of Minangkabau adat writings. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2659507
  7. Busriyanti, B., Pujiono, P., Mursalim, & Chamdan, U. (2025). Marriage law reform in Indonesia: A maqasid al-usrah perspective on legal adaptation. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12739
  8. Dikuraisyin, B., Sumarkan, Fatwa, A. F., & Ghozali, M. L. (2024). Reconstruction of marriage law: Judges’ progressive reasoning based on maqasid in addressing divergent interpretations in Indonesian courts. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 18(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i2.9436
  9. El-saha, M. I. (2019). Penghulu and marriage problematics of boundary society in Entikong and Sekayam, West Kalimantan. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 19(2), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v19i2.13178
  10. Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
  11. Farabi, A. (2020). The state penghulu vs the non-state penghulu: The validity and implementing authorities of Indonesian marriage. Justicia Islamica, 17(2), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v17i2.2180
  12. Fauzi, M. L. (2019). Registering Muslim marriages: Penghulu, modin, and the struggles for influence. Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 57(2), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.572.397-424
  13. Gunawan, M. I., Wijaya, S., & Rusmiati, R. (2025). Pembaruan pemikiran hukum Islam Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy: Telaah historis lahirnya fiqih keindonesiaan. Maqosid: Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 13(2), 189–225. https://doi.org/10.37216/maqosid.v13i2.2950
  14. Hakim, M. L., Sugianto, S., Muala, A., Khamim, K., & Ismail, H. (2020). Implementasi, kendala dan efektivitas kursus pranikah di KUA Kecamatan Pontianak Tenggara. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1817
  15. Kharlie, A. T., Fathudin, F., & Triana, W. (2021). Reforming Islamic marriage bureaucracy in Indonesia: Approaches and impacts. Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 59(2), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.255-286
  16. Kurniawan, M. R., Fathony, M. R., Yasin, D. T., Jibu, S. A., & Shamat, A. (2025). Political analysis of Islamic law on the regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia. Insani: Jurnal Pranata Sosial Hukum Islam, 1(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.65586/insani.v1i1.2
  17. Marita, M., & Pramesti, Y. P. (2023). Feminist legal theory as a review of legal philosophy: Its relation with gender equality in Indonesia. Journal of Transcendental Law, 5(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v5i2.4160
  18. Masrofah, M., Widodo, S., & Saefudin, Y. (2026). Comparative study of polygamy in the marriage law based on Islamic law and feminism perspective. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v11i1.27327
  19. Mufti, M. (2024). Gender equality in Islamic marriage law through the maqasid al-sharia perspective: A study on woman-initiated divorce in Indonesia. Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender, 19(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v19i1.22641
  20. Muhazir, M. (2020). Dualisme peraturan perceraian di Aceh: Kontestasi fatwa dan hukum negara. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 13(2), 198–208.
  21. Muhazir, M., & Azwir, A. (2024). Divorce bureaucracy in the sharia space: Examining practices in Langsa City, Aceh. At-Tafkir, 17(1), 44–55.
  22. Muhazir, M., Azwir, A., & Zubir, Z. (2024). Legal institutions in resolving divorce cases in Aceh. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), 211–230.
  23. Mutaqin, Z. Z. (2018). Culture, Islamic feminism, and the quest for legal reform in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2018.1524549
  24. Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi normatif dan empiris dalam perspektif ilmu hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
  25. Permata, C. (2023). When state regulates husband’s idah: Pros and cons among penghulu in Yogyakarta. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 16(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2023.16205
  26. Saefullah, A., Hazmirullah, H., Burhanudin, D., Pinem, M., Hanif, A., & Suryadi, S. (2025). The penghulu court, Islam, and customary law: Critical analysis of the handling of a murder case in Cirebon in 1794. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 24(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.13276
  27. Safarudin, R., Zulfamanna, Z., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Penelitian kualitatif. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 9680–9694.
  28. Saputra, M. (2018). Penghulu wanita menurut penghulu Kantor Urusan Agama Kota Yogyakarta. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 11(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2018.11208
  29. Silalahi, P. A., & Zainal. (2025). Peran penghulu dalam penyelenggaraan pembangunan di Kepenghuluan Pasir Putih Kecamatan Balai Jaya Kabupaten Rokan Hilir. Jurnal Mahasiswa Pemerintahan, 434–441.
  30. Sutrisno, E., Fanani, A., Marsidi, M., & Muhammad, A. A. (2023). Female leaders in the perspective of Islamic law and legal regulations. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 2(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i1.6879
  31. Tarigan, R. S., Saragih, Y. M., Sembiring, T. B., Isa, S. N., & Telaumbanua, S. E. (2025). Pengembangan metode penelitian hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(1), 1093–1100.
  32. Widarto, M., Shahrullah, R. S., & Syarief, E. (2025). Legal responsibility of the penghulu in same-sex marriage involving fake identity in Batam City. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.10099
  33. Widiyanto, A. (2013). Religious pluralism and contested religious authority in contemporary Indonesian Islam: A. Mustofa Bisri and Emha Ainun Nadjib. In Islam in Indonesia. Routledge.