Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 20, 2022
Accepted
Jun 30, 2022
Published
Jun 30, 2022
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 371 Download : 251

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

A linguistic study about Systemic Functional linguistics commonly analyzes the text in an article, journal, magazine, novel, or headline in a newspaper. However, the texts from a board game will be examined in this study. This study analyzed the mood system and sentence structure. The theories that Halliday and Matthiessen, 1992 on mood Analysis and the theory of Oshima and Hogue, 2007 are used to analyze the sentence structure. This study was qualitative research. The data are the text in every flash card in the “Speak It Up!†board game. The results of the study are, first, the declarative sentence was dominantly found in the study. Second, the results showed that the simple sentence was dominantly found. That means the language in every flash card is appropriate for children because the language is easy to understand.

Keywords

Sentence Structure Board Game Systemic Functional Linguistics Linguistics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nina Hayuningtyas, & Mega Fariziah N. H. (2022). An Analysis of Sentence Structure on A Game “Speak It Up!”: Systemic Functional Linguistic Study. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 3(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v3i1.4313

References

  1. Aarts, Flor dan Jan M.G. Aarts. 1982. English Syntactic Structure Function and. Categories in Sentence Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Analisti, D. (2016). Evaluating the Quality of Sentence Structures, Citations and References in Journal Articles: A Case Study in the Faculty of Mathematics and Science and the Faculty of Engineering. Passage, 4(1), 1-18
  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Eight Edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  4. Cahyani, I. (2020). Analysis of Simple Sentence Structure in English: Functional Syntax Approach. CLLiENT Journal (Journal of Culture, Literature, Linguistics and English Teaching) Vol.2, No. 2, November 2020
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fourth Edition. California: Sage publications.
  6. Elson, B. and Velina Pickett. (1962). An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Santa Anna, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics
  7. Fernandez, E. M., & Cairns, H. S. (2011). Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. Harvard: Harvard Press
  8. Fromkin, Victoria. (2001). Linguistics – An Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  9. Fung, Y. M., & Min, Y. L. (2016). “Effects of Board Game on Speaking Ability of Low-Proficiency ESL Learners”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(3), 261-271. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.261.
  10. Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
  11. Goldstein, B. E. (2008). Cognitive Psychology Connecting Mind, Research, and Everyday Experience (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA Thomson Wadsworth Publishing
  12. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second Edition. London: Edward Arnold.
  13. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge.
  16. Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course of modern linguistics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  17. Putrayasa, I. B., Ramendra, D.P., Aryana, I. B. P. M., (2018). The Analysis of Sentences’ Structure of Students’ Compositions at Grade VI of Elementary Schools in Bali Province. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 263 International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018)
  18. Putri N., Setiyadi, B., Sudirman, S. (2018) The Implementation of Board Game to Improve Students’ Speaking Achievement. U-JET Unila Journal of English Teaching Vol. 7 No. 2 2018.
  19. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  20. Miller, J. (2002) An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
  21. Oshima, A and Hogue, A. (2007) Introduction to Academic Writing. New York: Pearson Longman.
  22. Rohdiana, A. (2017). Developing Communnicative Board Game In Speaking Descriptive Text To EFL Young Learners. The 2nd TEYLIN International Conference April 2017 ISBN : 978-602-1180-45-7
  23. Smith, H. (2006). Playing to learn: A qualitative analysis of bilingual pupil-pupil talk during board game play. Language and Education, 20(5), 415-437