Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates how insulting language is used in Indonesian online media and how it reflects social context through the lens of register theory. The research aims to examine how the use of offensive terms such as bodoh, tolol, goblok, and dungu varies according to field, tenor, and mode, and how these variations relate to the speaker's role and communicative purpose. The study analyzed 20 utterances containing insulting language, quoted in news articles published on detik.com between January and June 2025. The data were purposively sampled to include diverse speakers, netizens, religious leaders, political figures, and commentators, allowing the study to capture linguistic variation across social roles. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the study employed manual content analysis based on Halliday’s (1978) theory of register. Each utterance was examined in relation to its field, tenor, and mode. The results show that netizens tend to use insults as spontaneous expressions of emotion and group alignment, while public figures use similar language more strategically, either to persuade, criticize, or assert authority. Religious and political leaders, for example, use offensive terms rhetorically within moral or ideological discourse, revealing that insulting language is not always intended to harm but can also serve as a tool for emphasis, contrast, or resistance. The study concludes that offensive language in digital media is deeply shaped by social context and communicative intent. These findings contribute to sociolinguistics and applied communication by demonstrating how language, especially in its harshest forms; constructs identity, authority, and meaning in contemporary digital interaction.

Keywords

Digital Discourse Insulting Language Online Media Register Theory Sociolinguistics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
-, S. A. S., & Dwi Anggoro Hadiutomo. (2026). A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Insulting Language in Indonesian Online Media . JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 11(2), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v11i2.11908

References

  1. Aditya, S. E., Puspani, I. A. M., Pastika, I. W., & Beratha, N. L. S. (2024). Lexicogrammatical analysis of insulters in the viral video “Labrak Pelakor” on YouTube Indonesia. In Proceedings of Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 22, 361–370. Universitas Udayana.
  2. Aguilar Solano, M. (2020). Triangulation and trustworthiness: advancing research on
  3. Public service interpreting through qualitative case study methodologies.
  4. Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Nababan, M., Santosa, R., & Anis, M. Y. (2024). Socio-pragmatic analysis of utterances with polite addressing terms: translation shift across Arabic-English cultures. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2359764. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2359764
  5. Ayomi, P. N., Pratiwi, D. P. E., & Krismayani, N. W. (2025). Detecting Linguistic
  6. Characteristics of Political Disinformation in Indonesian Social Media: Insights From Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 16(3).
  7. Balkin, J. M. (2017). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of
  8. expression for the information society. In Law and Society approaches to cyberspace (pp. 325-382). Routledge.
  9. Dara, D., Ny, S., & Saleem, M. (2023). Corpus-based approach to sociolinguistic study
  10. Of offensive words: Gender, time and register differences. Journal of Language Development and Linguistics, 2(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.55927/jldl.v2i2.3960
  11. Gathmyr, M. R., & Surenggo, M. B. A. (2022). Investigating the Role of Symbolic Elites In Shaping Public Discourse: A Case of Detikcom. KnE Social Sciences, 216-234. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i4.10525
  12. Gnach, A. (2017). Social media and community building: Creating social realities
  13. Trough linguistic interaction. In The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp. 190-205). Routledge.
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language
  15. And meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
  16. Lisnawati, I. (2024). Analysis Of Preposition Usage In The Online News Portal Detik.
  17. Com. Journal Of Humanities And Social Studies, 2(01), 20-25. https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/article/view/224.
  18. Mardikantoro, H. B., Siroj, M. B., Utami, E. S., & Kurniati, E. (2023). Investigating
  19. Indonesian language varieties in social media interactions: Implications to teaching practices. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63069
  20. Matthiessen, C. M. (2019). Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register
  21. Studies, 1(1), 10-41. https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18010.mat
  22. McIntosh, J. (2020). Maledictive language: Obscenity and taboo words. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, 1-9.
  23. Mooney, A., & Evans, B. (2018). Language, society and power: An introduction. Routledge.
  24. Mubarok, Y., Sudana, D., Yanti, D., Sugiyo, S., Aisyah, A. D., & Af’idah, A. N. (2024). Abusive comments (hate speech) on Indonesian social media: A forensic linguistics approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1440–1449. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.16
  25. Nugroho, S., Arezah, E., Ahkam Alwi, M., Napitupulu, L., & Arief, Y. (2023). Why is
  26. Generation Z Prone to Swearing? A Psycholinguistic Study on Semantic Shifts in Profanity. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 301-315. https://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/22904
  27. Owen, M. (2019). Apologies and remedial interchanges: A study of language use in social
  28. interaction. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  29. Purwaningrum, P. W., & Harmoko, D. D. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of proportional closed election system news (on the online media CNNindonesia. com and News. detik. com). NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 5(2), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v5i2.7960
  30. Rega, R., Marchetti, R., & Stanziano, A. (2023). Incivility in online discussion: An
  31. examination of impolite and intolerant comments. Social Media+ Society, 9(2), 20563051231180638. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231180638
  32. Sakki, I., & Martikainen, J. (2021). Mobilizing collective hatred through humour: Affective– discursive production and reception of populist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 610-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12419
  33. Setyaningtias, S., Heriyanto, E., & Muhid, A. (2023). The use of swearing words of
  34. young multicultural students: A sociolinguistics study. Electrum, 1(1), 1–3. https://unaki.ac.id/electrum
  35. Song, Y., Kwon, K. H., Xu, J., Huang, X., & Li, S. (2021). Curbing profanity online: A network-based diffusion analysis of profane speech on Chinese social media. New Media & Society, 23(5), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820905068
  36. Swann, J. (2019). Dictionary of sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
  37. Tahir, I., & Ramadhan, M. G. F. (2024). Hate speech on social media: Indonesian
  38. netizens’ hate comments of presidential talk shows on YouTube. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.8180
  39. Weirich, A. C. (2021). Access and reach of linguistic repertoires in periods of change: A theoretical approach to sociolinguistic inequalities. International journal of the sociology of language, 2021(272), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0047
  40. Wu, T. Y., & Atkin, D. J. (2018). To comment or not to comment: Examining the
  41. influences of anonymity and social support on one’s willingness to express in online news discussions. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4512-4532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818776629

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'