Main Article Content

Abstract

Study explores the manjae tradition of the Batak Toba Toba community as a form of oral cultural expression that integrates language, ritual, and social values. Positioned within the framework of anthropolinguistics, the research investigates how customary speech, gestures, and symbolic materials function as performative acts that signify social transition, particularly following marriage. Using a qualitative ethnographic approach, data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and textual documentation, with analysis guided by Spradley’s ethnographic model and speech act theory. The findings reveal that manjae comprises distinct ritual stages—mamio, core ceremonial activities, and manjalangi—each rich in structured speech and symbolic performance. Expressions such as “Horas ma dihita sasudena” and “Hamuna ma situtupi adatmuna” reflect layered functions of advice, blessing, and identity affirmation. The study highlights how elements like ulos, proxemic arrangements, and kinetic gestures reinforce social legitimacy and cultural continuity. In doing so, this research contributes to the understanding of oral tradition not merely as storytelling, but as a dynamic system of communication and cultural inheritance. It also underscores the urgency of preserving manjae amidst sociocultural change, offering a significant contribution to the fields of linguistic anthropology and cultural heritage studies.

Keywords

anthropolinguistics Dalihan Na Tolu oral tradition of Manjae performance theory speech act

Article Details

How to Cite
Sialagan, G. (2026). Manjae Oral Tradition: An Anthropolinguistic Study of The Tobanese Community In North Sumatra. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 11(2), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v11i2.12348

References

  1. Annisa, R., Putri, L. M., & Ramadhani, A. (2023). Managing participation and coherence through discourse markers in talk shows. In Journal of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 44–59).
  2. Arya, D. P. (2022). Fillers and discourse markers in EFL learners’ oral performance. In TEFL Journal: Teaching English as a Foreign Language (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 56–68).
  3. Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Conversational repair and discourse markers in multilingual interaction. In Pragmatics and Society (Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 36–57). https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19024.cri
  4. Farahani, M. V, & Ghane, A. (2022). Corpus-based analysis of discourse markers in academic speech. In Language and Communication Studies (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 77–89).
  5. Fatmah, R., Sari, R. N., & Wulandari, D. (2024). Expressing stance and emotion through discourse markers in podcast conversations. In Journal of Pragmatic Studies (Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 20–33).
  6. Fraser, B. (2021). Revisiting discourse markers: Classification and function. In Journal of Pragmatics (Vol. 179, pp. 80–94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.005
  7. Gabarró-López, S. (2020). Polyfunctionality of discourse markers in sign languages. In Sign Language & Linguistics (Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 1–32). https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19008.gab
  8. Harahap, R. S. (2020). The role of podcasts in language learning and public discourse. In Journal of Digital Media in Language Education (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 15–23).
  9. Hazem, A., Ariffin, K., & Zainal, A. (2021). The textual role of discourse markers in literary discourse. In International Journal of English Linguistics (Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 45–55). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n3p45
  10. Kanaza, M. (2020). Language and identity: A sociocultural perspective. In African Journal of Linguistic Studies (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 87–99).
  11. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Ramadhani, D., & Syarif, H. (2021). Discourse markers and L1 interference in students’ oral presentations. In JELLT: Journal of English Language and Language Teaching (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 11–20).
  13. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3, Ed.). Longman.
  14. Sari, F. M. (2023). Discourse markers in scientific debates: A functional analysis. In Journal of Applied Linguistics and Education (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 29–42).
  15. Sarira, R., Handayani, D., & Prasetyo, H. (2023). Pragmatic competence and the use of discourse markers by EFL learners. In Language and Education Review (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 92–108).
  16. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Stark, R., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Sledge Moore, J. (2021). Spoken discourse characteristics in natural conversation. In Discourse Processes (Vol. 58, Issue 4, pp. 215–238). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1807143
  18. Urcia, C. (2021). Constructivist views in qualitative research: Implications for linguistics. In Journal of Social Language Studies (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 61–70).
  19. Ussolichah, S., Fatimah, M., & Rachmawati, D. (2021). Discourse markers in Avengers: Endgame movie. In Journal of Language and Literature (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 143–153).

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'