Section Articles

Resolution of Theft Offenses within the Family: Perspectives of Islamic Penal Law and Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008

Cut Afrah Zulvyla
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
IAIN Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
Aminah
IAIN Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
Nur Anshari
IAIN Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 19, 2024
Published
Jan 6, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 38 Download : 94

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The resolution of theft crimes within families should prioritize an approach that focuses on restoring relationships between the involved parties, with peace and reconciliation as the primary principles. A legal process that emphasizes rehabilitation, compensation for losses, and the prevention of social damage is considered more effective in restoring harmony within families. In practice, such resolution is often hindered by formal legal procedures that tend to focus on punishment, which sometimes fails to address the need for healing and familial harmony. This study aims to analyze how theft crimes within families are resolved according to Islamic criminal law and Aceh Qanun No. 9 of 2008. The method used in this research is a literature review, analyzing relevant legal literature, applicable laws, and regulations within the context of Islamic criminal law and Acehnese customary law. The resolution of theft within families according to Islamic criminal law emphasizes peace and the restoration of relationships between the parties involved, while Aceh Qanun No. 9 of 2008 offers a resolution mechanism through customary deliberation involving all related parties. Both approaches share the same goal: to maintain social harmony and repair the damage caused by the crime without resorting to formal legal procedures.

Keywords

Theft in Families Islamic Criminal Law Aceh Qanun

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the AJIL: Aceh Journal of Islamic Law right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the AJIL: Aceh Journal of Islamic Law published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Amdani, Yusi. “Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian oleh Anak Berbasis Hukum Islam dan Adat Aceh.” Al-’Adalah 13, no. 1 (July 4, 2017): 81–76. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v13i1.1130.
  2. Artika, Rigen Mas Respati. “Pencurian Antar Orang yang Punya Hubungan Keluarga Tertentu sebagai Delik Aduan Relatif Menurut Pasal 367 Ayat (2) KUHP.” Lex Privatum 8, no. 4 (October 20, 2020). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/30987.
  3. Dermawan, Budi, and M. Noor Harisudin. “Transformasi Pemikiran Hukum Pidana Islam Terhadap Hukum Pidana Nasional (Analisis Implementatif Jarimah Hudud, Qishash Dan Ta’zir).” Rechtenstudent 1, no. 3 (2020): 251–63. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v1i3.34.
  4. Dewi, Asrah, Waspada Santing, and Siti Zubaidah. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga.” Clavia 21, no. 3 (December 30, 2023): 420–31. https://doi.org/10.56326/clavia.v21i3.4007.
  5. Eman, Vanessa Aulin. “Pembahasan Atas Delik Aduan Pencurian dalam Keluarga (Analisis Pasal 367 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).” Lex Crimen 10, no. 3 (April 1, 2021). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33123.
  6. Fauzi, Sekar Resti, and Fery Dona. “Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Polres Purworejo.” Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi, May 20, 2022, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.22515/alhakim.v4i1.5251.
  7. Febriansyah, Febriansyah. “Hukuman Pencuri yang Mengembalikan Barang Curian Perspektif Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Hanafi.” Masters, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, 2019. https://doi.org/10/MOTTO%20DAN%20PERSEMBAHAN.pdf.
  8. Harahap, Irwan Safaruddin. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Kejahatan Seksual dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, no. 1 (June 30, 2016). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0066.37-47.
  9. Hutomo, Irfan Rizky, Urip Giyono, and Muh Alfi Ihsanu Amala. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga.” Jurnal Jendela Hukum 10, no. 1 (August 20, 2023): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.24929/jjh.v10i1.2843.
  10. Jamhir, Jamhir, and Mustika Alhamra. “Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Hukum Positif Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Islam.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 8, no. 1 (June 26, 2019): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v8i1.6441.
  11. Junaidi, Junaidi, Muhaddis Muhaddis, Dicky Armanda, and Taufik Gunawan. “Implementasi Qanun Aceh Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Tingkat Gampong.” Mimbar Administrasi FISIP Untag Semarang 21, no. 2 (October 1, 2024): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v21i2.2055.
  12. Lopo, Dion Reyvaldo Sar. “Perbandingan Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga.” Jurnal Panah Hukum 2, no. 1 (February 21, 2023): 36–49.
  13. Mawar, Sitti. “Pembinaan Kehidupan Adat dan Adat Istiadat dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Pidana Adat (Studi terhadap Efektivitas Keberlakuan Qanun Aceh Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 di Kecamatan Kota Sigli).” Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial 4, no. 2 (December 27, 2019): 154–63. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v4i2.5967.
  14. Mikroj, Mohamad, and Adang Djumhur. “Restorative Justice sebagai Perwujudan Keadilan dalam Perspektif Teori Kemaslahatan (Maqashid Al-Syari’ah).” Tahkim 19, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 238–53. https://doi.org/10.33477/thk.v19i2.5164.
  15. Najwa, Nur, Nabila Anggraini, Herlina Herlina, and Surya Sukti. “Perampokan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum 1, no. 2 (May 6, 2024): 165–75. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.215.
  16. Nasution, Rasina Padeni, and Muhammad Calvin. “Family Theft: Perspective of Positive Law and Islamic Penal Law.” Lex Lectio Law Journal 2, no. 2 (December 28, 2023): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.61715/jlexlectio.v2i2.41.
  17. Natawikrama, Raden Rahmat Aditya, Wahyu Afnan Hasbullah, Ervan Yoga Yahayyu Davendra, Yahya Ayas Adi Prasetyo, and Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha. “Sanksi Potong Tangan Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Perspektif Fiqh Perbandingan Mazhab & Hukum Positif di Indonesia.” Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 3, no. 1 (May 14, 2024): 191–99.
  18. Pinem, Serimin. “Theoretical Review of Restorative Justice as a Breakthrough in Resolving Legal Cases by the Indonesian National Police.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 23, no. 2 (July 12, 2024): 1491–1511. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.3653.
  19. Ramadhani, Wahyu. “Eksistensi Qanun Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan di Kota Langsa.” Legalite: Jurnal Perundang-Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam 5, no. 1 (September 10, 2020): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i1.1476.
  20. Rizky, Mifftahur, Surahman Surahman, and Rio Arif Pratama. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian.” Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 4, no. 8 (August 28, 2024): 703–20. https://doi.org/10.59141/cerdika.v4i8.842.
  21. Rochaeti, Nur, Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, and Ji Hyun Park. “Implementing of Restorative Justice to Build the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Study of the Batak Toba Justice System.” Law Reform 19, no. 2 (November 24, 2023): 221–47. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.53184.
  22. Tampi, Butje. “Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Keluarga Berdasarkan Pasal 367 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Lex Crimen 2, no. 3 (August 16, 2013). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/2428.
  23. Yasa, Kadek Putra, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, and Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. “Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian dalam Lingkup Keluarga di Kejaksaan.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis 3, no. 3 (July 1, 2023): 135–45.