Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 431 Download : 348

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Islamic Well-Being Scale (IWBS) is an instrument developed to assess well-being specifically in Muslims. However, the instrument was developed for the Muslim population in Turkey. Therefore, this study aims to translate the IWBS into Indonesian and validate it on a sample of Muslims in Indonesia. The translation of the IWBS was carried out by two professional Turkish translators and evaluated by a reconciliation team. The Indonesian version of the IWBS was then tested on 175 adult Muslims (54 males and 119 females, mean age = 25.8 years, age range = 18–73 years). Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indices of the one-factor measurement model of the IWBS fit the data (SRMR = 0.055; CFI = 0.988; TLI = 0.985). Internal consistency reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha, ordinal alpha, Bollen's omega, Bentler's omega, and McDonald's omega formulas showed satisfactory values, 0.919, 0.959, 0.920, 0.920, and 0.934, respectively. The Indonesian version of the IWBS has good psychometric properties and has the potential to be used as an instrument for measuring Islamic well-being. However, the Indonesian version of the IWBS is recommended to be further tested in a larger sample that represents the entire Indonesian Muslim population.

Keywords

factor analysis Indonesian Islamic well-being validation well-being

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the authors' work non-commercially, and although the others' new works must also acknowledge the authors and be non-commercial, they do not have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). In other words, authors can archive pre-print (submitted version),  post-print (accepted version), and publisher's version/PDF.
How to Cite
Priyadi, S., A’yyunA. Q., Harsono, M. H. A., & Azmi, K. S. (2024). Validation of the Indonesian version of the Islamic Well-being Scale. INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research, 5(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.32505/inspira.v5i2.9466

References

  1. Abu-Raiya, H. (2017). A critique from within: Some important research issues that psychologists of religion and spirituality should further work on. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 20(6), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1377945
  2. Abu-Raiya, H., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Empirically based psychology of Islam: Summary and critique of the literature. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670903426482
  3. Bagis, F., Adawiyah, W. R., Purnomo, R., & Sudjadi, A. (2024). Exploring Islamic spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and validation of a measurement scale. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/0020247473500
  4. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  5. Clark, D. A., & Bowles, R. P. (2018). Model fit and item factor analysis: Overfactoring, underfactoring, and a program to guide interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1461058
  6. Coulthard, R. J. (2013). Rethinking back-translation for the cross-cultural adaptation of health-related questionnaires: Expert translators make back-translation unnecessary [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Santa Catarina]. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/123163
  7. Daliman, D. (2021). Ethical conduct-do and general well-being among university students, moderated by religious internalization: An Islamic perspective. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v6i2.14886
  8. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  9. Epskamp, S. (2015). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847
  10. Eryilmaz, A., & Kula, N. (2020). An Investigation of Islamic well-being and mental health. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(2), 1096–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0588-0
  11. Gallucci, M., & Jentschke, S. (2021). SEMLj: Structural equation models in Jamovi (Version 1.1.6) [Computer software]. https://github.com/semlj/semlj
  12. Hudiyawati, D., Chouhan, D. S., Wibowo, D. M., & Mujannidah, A. (2024). The spiritual well-being to the quality of life of heart failure patients. Jurnal Berita Ilmu Keperawatan, 17(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.23917/bik.v17i1.3786
  13. Islam by country. (2023). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country
  14. Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., Preacher, K., Coffman, D., Rhemtulla, M., Robitzsch, A., Enders, C., Arslan, R., Clinton, B., Panko, P., Merkle, E., Chesnut, S., … Johnson, A. R. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
  15. Joshanloo, M. (2017). Islamic conceptions of well-being. In R. J. Estes & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), The Pursuit of Human Well-Being (pp. 109–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39101-4_5
  16. Koburtay, T., Syed, J., & Salhi, N. A. (2022). Theorizing the notion of well‐being in Islam: An update of Ryff’s theory of eudaimonic psychological well‐being. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(5), 2475–2490. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22790
  17. Koydemir, S., Sökmez, A. B., & Schütz, A. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of randomized controlled positive psychological interventions on subjective and psychological well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(3), 1145–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09788-z
  18. Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  19. Maulana, H., Khawaja, N., & Obst, P. (2021). An Indonesian model of well‐being: The integration of universal and cultural factors. Psych Journal, 10(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.402
  20. Nabi, U., Shah, S. A., & Seh, A. H. (2023). A comprehensive literature review of Islam-oriented scales on religiosity, spirituality, and morality. Archive for the Psychology of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724231190958
  21. Nunes, A. R., Lee, K., & O’Riordan, T. (2016). The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: The example of health and well-being. BMJ Global Health, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000068
  22. Prasetyaningrum, J., Fadjaritha, F., Aziz, M. F., & Sukarno, A. (2021). Kesejahteraan psikologis Santri Indonesia. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 23(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v23i1.16796
  23. Priyadi, S. (2024). Differential item functioning (DIF): Sebuah analisis bibliometrik. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 3975–3989. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.7463
  24. Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: A critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.10
  25. Putri, O. H., & Anganthi, N. R. N. (2023). Spiritual well-being and death anxiety in chronic diseases: A meta-analysis study. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 8(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v8i2.21150
  26. Revelle, W. (2021). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  27. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  28. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
  29. Seol, H. (2023). Seolmatrix: Correlations suite for Jamovi (Version 3.7.2) [Computer software]. https://github.com/hyunsooseol/seolmatrix
  30. Shahama, A., Patel, A., Carson, J., & Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2022). The pursuit of happiness within Islam: A systematic review of two decades of research on religiosity and happiness in Islamic groups. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 25(7), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2022.2028748
  31. Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434
  32. The Jamovi project. (2021). Jamovi (Version 2.3.28.0) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org/
  33. Yuliatun, I., & Karyani, U. (2022). Improving the psychological well-being of nurses through Islamic positive psychology training. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 7(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v7i1.10792