Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cilacap State Polytechnic students' readiness for the EPT-P and determine the obstacles they encounter as well as the strategies they employ to pass the test. This research used a mixed-methods case study design. To collect data, it used test and questionnaires which refer to the theory of Self-Regulated Learning, Test Taking Strategy, TAM and study of interlanguage. Analysis was based on Likert scale responses. It involved 60 final-year students of Cilacap State Polytechnic in the academic year of 2021/2022 from different study programmes. The study found that students at the State Polytechnic of Cilacap had a general lack of English competence, with just 25 out of 60 (41%) scoring over the 400 EPT-P pass score. Key issues were linguistic difficulties 37 students (62%) struggled with long reading texts, 41 (68%) struggled with essay writing, and 40 (67%) had difficulty listening, with 17 (28%) strongly agreeing.  Psychological challenges were particularly significant: 28 students (47%) reported anxiety, while 44 (73%) reported losing focus. Technological and resource challenges were prominent, with 40 students (67%) lacking preparation materials and 55 (92%) never having had official instruction. Furthermore, 33 students (55%) considered the listening equipment unclear, and 54 (90%) thought the test was overpriced. Only 16 students (27%) prepared mentally and physically, while only 9 (15%) took classes. These findings, which were backed by many language learning and educational theories, emphasise the importance of economical training, easily accessible materials, and personalised coaching in improving student performance.

Keywords

English proficiency test Readiness Challenge Strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
Widianingsih, B., Vikasari, C., Hazrina, F., & Prabowo, A. S. (2025). Assessing Cilacap State Polytechnic Students’ Ability to Conduct English Proficiency Test: Challenges and Strategies. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 6(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v6i1.11456

References

  1. Agustina Sari, Y., Latief, S., & Al Faruq Hasyim, U. A. (2021). Investigasi Kesulitan Mahasiswa pada Structure and Written Expression Section of TOEFL di Perguruan Tinggi Kota Metro. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 33-69. doi:10.22216/jcc.2021.v6i1.122
  2. Alek, Farhan, M., Nurlia, V., & Haucsa, M. G. (2019). University students ’ perception on TOEFL as a graduation requirement : A case in UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. ELITE Journal, 1(1), 51-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.33752/teflics.v1i2.2163
  3. Ali, S. W. (2020). EFL Students’ Problems and Strategies in TOEFL Test. Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies, 124-135.
  4. Azhari, T., Sahputri, J., & Rasyimah. (2022). Analysis of Student Perceptions on the Implementation of Required TOEFL Test before Graduation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM 2021). 648, pp. 125-130. Aceh: Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220302.019
  5. Beglar, D., & Nemoto, T. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. JALT2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-8). Tokyo: JALT.
  6. Bruce, Behbahani, M., Sarraf, Cariz, B., Kucher, K., Morsali, S., . . . Conine, J. (2018). TOEFL Strategies. West Hollywood: Nova Press. Retrieved from Visit Bruce Stirling at www.LinkedIn.com
  7. Cohen, D. A. (2007). The Coming of Age for Research on The Test Taking Strategies. In J. Fox, M. Wesche, D. Bayliss, L. Cheng, E. C. Turner, & C. Doe, Language Testing Reconsidered (pp. 89-112). Kanada: University of Ottawa Press.
  8. Fitria, T. N., & Prastiwi, I. E. (2020). Pelatihan Tes Toefl (Test of English Foreign Language) Untuk Siswa Smk/Sma, Mahasiswa, Dosen Dan Umum. Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 173-180. doi:10.29040/budimas.v2i2.1457
  9. Friska, Y. (2022). Problems in Reading Comprehension of TOEFL Prediction Test. Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 96-104. doi:0.31004/jele.v7i2.310
  10. Herman Herman . (2023). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Learning TOEFL . Jurnal ideas, 805-812.
  11. Horwitz, K. E., Horwitz, B. M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. Retrieved 02 10, 2012, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/327317
  12. Janeri, M. (2024). STUDENTS’ PROBLEMS, CHALLENGES, AND EXPECTATIONS IN TAKING TOEFL. IAIN Curup, Tariyah Faculty. Curup: Tadris, English Program Study, Tarbiyah Faculty.
  13. Lander, J. A., & Brown, H. D. (1995). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Vol. 71). London: Longman. doi:10.2307/415773
  14. Maulana, C., & Lubis, I. A. (2022). Students' Problem of Taking Toefl Test At Stmik Royal Academic Year 2020/2021. Journal of Science and Social Research, 5(1), 5-10. doi:10.54314/jssr.v5i1.811
  15. Mulyapradana, A., Anjarini, A. D., Elshifa, A., Gulam, H., & Winarsih. (2023). Pengenalan dan Latihan Soal Tes TOEFL Guna Meningkatkan Kemampuan bahasa Inggris pada Mahasiswa. BERDAYA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 51-60. doi:10.36407/berdaya.v5i1.823
  16. Narayana, I. G., & Soepriyanti, H. (2023). Students’ Difficulties in Coping with TOEFL Test: A Case Study in a Postgraduate English Program of a State University in Mataram. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(6), 321-325. doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v10i6.4780
  17. Nattinger, J. (2014). Some current trends in vocabulary teaching. California: University of California.
  18. Pramesti, R. A. (2023). Investigating Students' Strategies and Difficulties in Facing TOEFL Reading Section. Journal of English Language and Education, 8(2), 52-62.
  19. Purba, D., Panjaitan, J., & Pardede, D. L. (2024). PROBLEMS FOUND ON THE TOEFL TEST QUESTIONS BY THE FIFTH SEMESTER PHYSICS STUDENTS OF DARMA AGUNG UNIVERSITY. Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(2), 576-582. doi:10.46930/ojsuda.v32i2.4321
  20. Purwanto, E. (2022). Technology Adoption A Conceptual Framework MODEL KONSEPTUAL MINAT PENGGUNAAN E-WALLET: TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE. In E. Purwanto, Technology Adoption A Conceptual Framework (pp. 31-43). Tangerang: Philadelphia Publishing. Retrieved from www.philpublishing.com
  21. Rahman, A., & Purwaningtyas, M. (2022). Investigating Problems Encountered By the Test Takers During Taking Toefl Test. NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 141-153. doi:10.55681/nusra.v3i2.410
  22. Rifiyanti, H., Dewi, D. U., & Putra, F. M. (2023). The Role of TOEFL Preparation Courses in Improving Test Score. Foremost Journal, 4(2), 99-104. doi:10.33592/foremost.v4i2.3615
  23. Rionaldi, R., & Saputra, B. (2019). Improving Students’ Toefl-Like Score Through Student Team Achievement Division (Stad). Inovish Journal, 4(1), 38. doi:10.35314/inovish.v4i1.914
  24. Romadhon, R. (2022). Investigating Problems Faced By Students in Listening Section of Toefl Test. JOEEL: Journal of English Education and Literature, 3(2), 172-190. doi:10.38114/joeel.v3i2.220
  25. Sarair, Irnanda, S., Farsia, L., & Fadhlullah, R. (2024). Exploring Challenges and Strategies in TOEFL Preparation Among Students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching (JLLLT), 4(1), 1-17.
  26. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209-231.
  27. Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. In E. Hinkel, Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning Volume II (Vol. 2, pp. 593-610). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203836507.ch36
  28. Wolf, K. M., & Butler, G. Y. (2018). English Language Proficiency Assessment For Young Learners. In K. M. Wolf, & G. Y. Butler, English Language Proficiency Assessment For Young Learners (Vol. 2, pp. 3-12). London: Routledge.
  29. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions. Routledge, 41(2), 65-70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'