Section Articles

The Application of Maqasid Principles in the Resolution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Kota Langsa

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10887
Intan Ariska
intanariska15@icloud.com (Primary Contact)
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, IAIN Langsa, Indonesia
Tajul Ula
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, IAIN Langsa, Indonesia
Zefri Maulana
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, IAIN Langsa, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 31, 2025
Accepted
May 18, 2025
Published
May 24, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 105 Download : 56

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, dispute resolution in Islamic banking should reflect the principles of Maqasid al-Shariah, which emphasize justice, public welfare (maslahah), and the protection of five essential elements: religion (din), life (nafs), intellect (‘aql), lineage (nasl), and wealth (mal). However, the reality in Kota Langsa shows that in practice, dispute resolution often does not fully adhere to these principles. Complaints from customers still arise, with some perceiving the banks as lacking transparency and tending to adopt solutions that disadvantage the clients. This study aims to analyze the extent to which the principles of Maqasid al-Shariah are applied in resolving Islamic banking disputes in Kota Langsa. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a juridical-empirical approach. The findings reveal that the implementation of Maqasid al-Shariah has been integrated through Sharia-based mediation facilitated by arbitration institutions and religious courts. This approach is considered effective in producing fair and harmonious solutions that balance Sharia principles with the practical interests of the community. Nevertheless, strengthening Sharia legal education, improving competencies, and developing more integrated regulations are essential for long-term effectiveness.

Keywords

Maqasid al-Shariah Banking Dispute Islamic Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Ariska, I., Ula, T., & Maulana, Z. (2025). The Application of Maqasid Principles in the Resolution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Kota Langsa. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(1), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10887

References

  1. Al-Nahari, A. A. A. Q., Monawer, A. T. M., Haji Abdullah, L. B., Ali, A. K. B., Abdul Rahman, N. N. B., & Achour, M. (2022). Common Conceptual Flaws in Realizing Maq??id al-Shar??ah vis-à-vis Islamic Finance. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-12-2020-0259
  2. Alwi, M., Kara, M., Abdullah, M. W., & Fachrurrazy, M. (2022). Konsep Maqasid as Syariah dalam Perbankan Syariah. Al-Amwal: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 7(2), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.24256/alw.v7i2.3549
  3. Ariska, I. (2015a, January). Wawancara Akademisi dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah (DPS) Perbankan Syariah [Personal communication].
  4. Ariska, I. (2015b, January). Wawancara Mediator Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh [Personal communication].
  5. Ariska, I. (2025, January). Wawancara Nasabah Bank Syariah X [Personal communication].
  6. Bakhri, S., & Labibi, S. (2021). Perbankan Syariah dalam Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah. Economic: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.59943/economic.v12i2.2
  7. Budiman, I. (2021). Converting Conventional Banks to Sharia Banks in Aceh: An Effort to Maintain a Stable Economy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 10(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v10i1.8337
  8. Cinta Rahmi, Ahmad Aulia Rohman, Azzahra Elvina Sari, Salsa Layyinun Nadhifah, & Muhammad Rusydi Azmi. (2024). Penerapan Maqashid Syariah dalam Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Syariah Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah Research and Development Student, 2(2), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.59024/jis.v2i2.711
  9. Dewi, S., Tan, N., Andreas, K., Ong, C. M., & Wijayanti, S. (2024). Analisis Instrumen dan Klasifikasi Maqashid Sharia untuk Keberlanjutan Ekonomi: Studi Kasus Bank Syariah Indonesia. Jurnal Revenue: Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.46306/rev.v4i2.344
  10. Fanshurna, T., Saiban, K., & Munir, M. (2022). The Importance of Applying Maqashid al-Sharia in The Islamic Financial System. 4(1).
  11. Fatmawati, D., Ariffin, N. Mohd., Abidin, N. H. Z., & Osman, A. Z. (2022). Shariah Governance in Islamic Banks: Practices, Practitioners and Praxis. Global Finance Journal, 51, 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100555
  12. Husein, M. H. A. K., Mujib, A., & Suleman, N. H. (2022). The Urgency of Rescheduling Policy as a Solution to Sharia Banking Dispute on Murabahah Agreements. Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 7(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v7i2.2106
  13. Ibrahim, A., & Rahmati, A. (2017). Analisis Solutif Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah di Bank Syariah: Kajian pada Produk Murabahah di Bank Muamalat Indonesia Banda Aceh. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian dan Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 71–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v10i1.2319
  14. Istiqomawati, R., & Widiyastuti, A. (2023). Analisis Maqashid Syariah dalam Annual Report Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. IBSE Sharia Economic Journal, 2(1), 40–51. https://jurnal.steijogja.ac.id/index.php/ibsesej/index
  15. Kiranawati, Y. C., Aziza, S. M., Nasim, A., & Ningsih, C. (2023). Islamic Banking Governance in Maqashid Sharia Perspectives: A Systematic Literature Review. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 12(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v12i1.15446
  16. Kurrohman, T. (2020). Akad Pembiayaan Syariah yang Sesuai dengan Maqasid Syariah dalam Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v11i1.5611
  17. Mahmad Robbi, A. A., Ishak, M. S. I., & Asni, F. (2024). Al-Siy?sah al-Shar‘iyyah’s Consideration and Its Approach among the Governors in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Malaysian’s Experience. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(12), 3285–3303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2023-0155
  18. Mokodenseho, S., Siregar, R., Muslim, S., Hasibuan, K., & Rahman, R. (2024). Analysis of the Influence of Fiqh and Maqasid al-Syariah in the Formation of Islamic Legal Policy in Indonesia. West Science Islamic Studies, 2(01), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsiss.v2i01.590
  19. Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  20. Munandir, R., & Syufaat, S. (2023). Kritik Maqashid Syariah terhadap Penyelesaian Nasabah Wanprestasi pada Perbankan Syariah. Alhamra Jurnal Studi Islam, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v4i1.14909
  21. Oseni, U. A., Adewale, A., & Mohd Zain, N. R. B. (2016). Customers’ Perceptions on the Dispute Resolution Clauses in Islamic Finance Contracts in Malaysia. Review of Financial Economics, 31(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.05.004
  22. Pertiwi, T. D., & Herianingrum, S. (2024). Menggali Konsep Maqashid Syariah: Perspektif Pemikiran Tokoh Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 807. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v10i1.12386
  23. Puneri, A. (2021). Dispute Resolution for Islamic Banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 4(SI). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.v4i0.10084
  24. Soekanto, S. (1983). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Rineka Cipta.
  25. Srisusilawati, P., Hardianti, P. D., Erlianti, N., Pitsyahara, I. R., & Nuraeni, S. K. (2022). Implementasi Maqashid Syariah terhadap Produk Perbankan Syariah. Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v7i1.8409
  26. Triana, N., & Purwinto, D. (2018). Justice in Many Rooms in Sharia Banking Dispute Resolution to Achieve Justice. Diponegoro Law Review, 03(01), 43–63.
  27. Uliya, Z., & Sunandar, H. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. 1(1).