Section Articles

The Reformulation of Substitute Penalties for Corporations in Corruption Crimes: A Justice-Based Study

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.11139
Nani Arianti
nariania.7272@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Mispansyah Mispansyah
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Suprapto Suprapto
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 1, 2025
Accepted
Aug 27, 2025
Published
Aug 27, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 31 Download : 29

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, substitute fines imposed on corporations in corruption cases should effectively cover state losses and uphold justice; however, in reality, their implementation still faces obstacles, both in terms of regulation and execution. This study aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating substitute fines for corporations within the framework of equitable law enforcement. The methodology employed is normative juridical research with legislative, conceptual, and justice-value approaches. The findings indicate that reformulating substitute fines for corporations in corruption crimes is necessary to ensure sanctions are more effective, proportional, and aligned with corporate capacity and responsibility. Thus far, substitute fines have been oriented toward individuals, making them less relevant when applied to legal entities. Based on the value of justice, this reformulation should provide both a deterrent effect and restore state losses. Substitute fines function not only as punishment but also as a mechanism for recovery and corruption prevention in the future.

Keywords

Reformulation Substitute Fine Corporation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Arianti, N., Mispansyah, M., & Suprapto, S. (2025). The Reformulation of Substitute Penalties for Corporations in Corruption Crimes: A Justice-Based Study. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.11139

References

  1. Akbar, R. R. (2024). Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Tanpa Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Melalui Lembaga Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 1047–1062. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.6502
  2. Ali, M., Setiawan, M. A., Sanjaya, W., & Muliyono, A. (2022). Is Criminal Fine in Economic Legislations Effective? Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2068270. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2068270
  3. Amin, S., & Wicaksana, S. U. P. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Whistleblower dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i3.14468
  4. Ardiansyah, I. (2019). Solusi dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korporasi Ditinjau dari Aspek Kriteria dan Pola Pemidanaan. UIR Law Review, 3(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(01).2095
  5. Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
  6. Ghozali, E. (2024). Kebijakan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. Jurnal Hukum Justice, 1(2), 153–162.
  7. Guedhami, O., Pan, Y., Saadi, S., & Zhao, D. (2025). Do Environmental Penalties Matter to Corporate Innovation? Energy Economics, 141(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108064
  8. Hartika, L., Dithisari, I., & Andriati, S. L. (2022). Urgensi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti oleh Jaksa Eksekutor dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Binamulia Hukum, 11(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i2.297
  9. Hasbullah, H. (2017). Perintah Atasan atau Jabatan (Ambtelijk Bevel) sebagai Penyebab Korupsi di Lingkungan Birokrasi. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.338
  10. Iswara, D. A. (2020). Rekonstruksi Regulasi terhadap KPK dalam Pemberantasan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i4.205
  11. Mulatua, S., & Nggeboe, F. (2019). Efektivitas Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 9(1), 46–79. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v9i1.142
  12. Mustafiddin, A. S., Jaya, F. A., Susiana, L., & Susanawati. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 95/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Sby): Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 6(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v6i1.3259
  13. Padil, P. (2016). Karakteristik Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v4i1.280
  14. Palar, H., & Santiago, F. (2023). Challenges and Prospects for Replacement Money in Addressing Corruption Crimes in the Indonesian Corporate World. Journal of Social Research, 3(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i1.1639
  15. Rahim, A., & Asma, N. (2020). Analisis Substansi Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v3i1.910
  16. Rahmat, D. (2020). Formulasi Kebijakan Pidana Denda dan Uang Pengganti dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.686
  17. Rizky, A., Handrawan, H., Yusup, A., & Yusuf, H. (2022). Pemidanaan Uang Pengganti Terhadap Korporasi. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i1.24589
  18. Rodliyah, R., Suryani, A., & Husni, L. (2020). Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corporate Crime) dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 5(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v5i1.43
  19. Satria, H. (2018). Pembuktian Kesalahan Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 4(2), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.255
  20. Sinurat, A. (2024). The Existence of Criminal Fine and Payment of Replacement Money in Enforcing Corruption Criminal Laws in the Corruption Court in Kupang, Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e3148–e3148. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3149
  21. Siregar, D. S., Ablisar, M., & Yunara, E. (2023). Pelaksanaan Sanksi Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Terhadap Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(6), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i6.167
  22. Sudarto, Purwadi, H., & Hartriwiningsih. (2017). Mekanisme Perampasan Aset dengan Menggunakan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i1.18352
  23. Suprihanto, E., Utama, Y. J., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2023). Reformulasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif Kepolisian Menghadapi Korupsi Sebagai Ancaman Perang Proksi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.204-219