Section Articles

Normative Construction and Practical Implications of Industrial Design Disputes: A Juridical Analysis of the Geprek Bensu Case

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.11988
Adi Permadi
apermadi776@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Faris Makarim Pranotoputera
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Asep Husni
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Muhammad Athaillah Shahibul Hikam
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Tatang Astarudin
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 2, 2025
Accepted
Jan 8, 2026
Published
Jan 8, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, legal protection for industrial designs in Indonesia consistently adheres to the first-to-file principle, in which the party who first registers their design lawfully and in good faith is entitled to exclusive legal protection. However, in reality, complex disputes arise—as seen in the Geprek Bensu case—where claims over design ownership involve interpretations that touch upon morality, business reputation, and the applicant’s intent. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and practical implications of court decisions in the industrial design dispute between PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono and Ruben Onsu, with an emphasis on how the first-to-file principle is applied and interpreted in Indonesian legal practice. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a qualitative-descriptive approach, based on library research of relevant laws, court rulings, and legal literature. The findings indicate that, from a juridical perspective, the Supreme Court firmly upheld the first-to-file principle as stipulated in Article 12 of Law No. 31 of 2000, and rejected claims submitted without novelty and good faith. Normatively, the ruling forms a legal construction that clarifies the standards for industrial design registration and has practical implications by encouraging business actors, particularly MSMEs, to be more proactive in registering their designs lawfully and with integrity to obtain strong legal protection.

Keywords

Normative Construction Practical Implications Industrial Design

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Permadi, A., Pranotoputera, F. M., Husni, A., Shahibul Hikam, M. A., & Astarudin, T. (2026). Normative Construction and Practical Implications of Industrial Design Disputes: A Juridical Analysis of the Geprek Bensu Case. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 18(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.11988

References

  1. Amani, F. C., Japono, S. S., & Tuassalamony, A. A. (2024). Berakhirnya Sengketa Geprek Bensu. As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal, 3(1), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.56672/syirkah.v3i1.142
  2. Aritonang, A. R. B., Tarigan, A. E., & Utama, M. W. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Sengketa Hak atas Merek Dagang Geprek Bensu (Putusan Nomor 705 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(7), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v7i7.6981
  3. Augusdityar, Q., Citrawinda, C., & Nasruddin, M. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 147 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024. Krisna Law: Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37893/krisnalaw.v7i1.1092
  4. Baiti, D. M. L. N., Dewi, S. A., Ristianti, A. I., Hanifah, S., & Pamungkas, K. R. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelanggaran Hak Merek dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 162 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(3), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v4i3.3524
  5. Denny, D., Liegestu, Y. P., Novika, N., & Patros, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek di Indonesia: Studi Putusan. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377
  6. Julianti, L., Thalib, E. F., & Saputra, M. I. (2021). Pengaturan Konsep Kebaharuan Produk dalam Pendaftaran Desain Industri pada Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 3(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2960
  7. Kamani, N. K. M. L., & Khaerunnisa, V. (2023). Analisis Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Kasus Kontroversi Geprek Bensu dan Ruben Onsu: Perlindungan Hak Cipta dan Hak Merek dalam Industri Kuliner dan Hiburan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 28586–28597. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11522
  8. Lubis, M. A. Z., Saidin, Sembiring, R., & Leviza, J. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Desain Industri terkait dengan Kemasan Produk Jahe (Studi Putusan Nomor 583 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62281/v2i2.162
  9. Murniati, R. (2010). Tinjauan Yuridis Pengalihan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual berdasarkan Undang-Undang di Bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v4no3.271
  10. Pinem, L. E. N., & Gunadi, N. L. D. S. (2021). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa terhadap Hak Merek atas Putusan Geprek Bensu melawan I Am Geprek Bensu. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, 2(1), 24–35.
  11. Pramudito, A. P., Putra, V. A., & Hamdan, F. Z. Z. (2023). Analisis Prinsip First to File dalam Perkara Desain Industri (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 16/Pdt.Sus.DesainIndustri/2020/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat). Jurnal Suara Hukum, 5(2), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v5n2.p200-225
  12. Putri, R. (2022). Syarat Kebaruan pada Desain Industri sebagai Dasar Gugatan Pembatalan Desain Industri. Dharmasisya Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(4). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss4/34
  13. Rhizki Amelia, 1900874201111. (2023). Analisis Putusan Hakim Nomor 16/Pdt.Sus–Desain Industri/2020/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat antara Merek Geprek Bensu dan I Am Geprek Bensu [Skripsi, Universitas Batanghari Jambi]. http://repository.unbari.ac.id/2268/
  14. Safitri, A. N., Annisa, R., & Sadik, R. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Desain Industri berdasarkan UU Nomor 31 Tahun 2000. Al-Hakam Islamic Law & Contemporary Issues, 3(1), 35–41.
  15. Sari, D. P., Pazrin, F., Anggraeni, H. Y., & Septiani, T. (2024). Penyelesaian Perkara atas Sengketa Hak Merek Ayam Geprek Bensu dengan I’m Geprek Bensu berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 8(6). https://sejurnal.com/pub/index.php/jkim/article/view/2852
  16. Sinaga, N. A. (2015). Perlindungan Desain Industri sebagai Bagian dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Indsutri, 4. https://doi.org/10.35968/jti.v4i0.673
  17. Tua, W. R., Roito, B. C., Suryana, T. M. F., Akbar, K. N., Rahmawati, A. A., & Solapari, N. (2025). Sengketa Perlindungan Hak Cipta Merek Dagang: Studi Kasus Perselisihan Antara Geprek Bensu vs I am Geprek Bensu. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v2i1.182
  18. Wijayanto, B. T., & Sumanto, L. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Perspektif Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Dan Inovasi Teknologi, 3(01), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.59653/jimat.v3i01.1349
  19. Zulkarnain, A. (2024). Suatu Kelemahan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Desain Industri di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8157–8164. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1683