Section Articles

Corruption Prevention Model in the Procurement of Goods and Services by the Bima District Prosecutor’s Office

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.12059
Arif Setia Budi
alghifararif321@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
Syamsuddin Syamsuddin
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
Munir Munir
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 5, 2025
Accepted
Aug 12, 2025
Published
Aug 13, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 64 Download : 31

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, preventing corruption in the procurement of goods and services requires synergy between the Prosecutor’s Office, local government, and the community to establish a transparent, accountable, and technology-based system, reinforced through legal education and capacity building for law enforcement officers. However, at the Bima District Prosecutor’s Office, the implementation of this ideal model is still hindered by inter-agency coordination issues, limited human resources, and insufficient funding. This study aims to analyze the corruption prevention model in goods and services procurement implemented by the Bima District Prosecutor’s Office, outline the factors and challenges in prevention efforts, and propose recommendations for improvement. This article is classified as library research with a qualitative approach and a normative legal study method. The findings reveal that the procurement of goods and services is highly vulnerable to corruption due to the complexity of processes, weak oversight, and low public participation. The Bima District Prosecutor’s Office applies a normative-educative legal approach through legal counseling, legal assistance, strengthening judicial intelligence, and inter-agency coordination. Although this reflects the Prosecutor’s preventive role, its effectiveness remains limited by poor legal understanding, lack of e-procurement technology, and inadequate human resources, thus requiring continuous institutional, cultural, and technical strengthening.

Keywords

Prevention Model Corruption Prosecutor’s Office

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Budi, A. S., Syamsuddin, S., & Munir, M. (2025). Corruption Prevention Model in the Procurement of Goods and Services by the Bima District Prosecutor’s Office. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.12059

References

  1. Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Floreani, J. (2021). Corruption in economics: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1764476
  2. Baskoro, A. (2025). Combating corruption in procurement: The synergy of law enforcement, civil society, and digital oversight. Jurnal Pengadaan Indonesia, 4(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.59034/jpi.v4i1.59
  3. Cahyani, E. (2022). Pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 3(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v3i2.15527
  4. Farida, J. R., Kurniati, Y., & Ras, H. (2024). Efektivitas pencegahan dan penegakan hukum pidana terhadap politik uang dalam pemilu: Analisis yuridis berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum, Sosial & Humaniora, 2(4), 810–821.
  5. Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: A corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791211266377
  6. Guan, X., O’Connor, N. G., Wang, Z., Tian, Z., & Chan, S. F. (2024). Institutional distance and partnership governance arrangements: An exploratory study of the implementation of a large cross-border reconstruction project in China. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 31(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2023.2291452
  7. Gunawan, A., & Laksana, A. W. (2023). Effectiveness of law enforcement in investigation of criminal acts of corruption. Ratio Legis Journal, 2(2), 765–773. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.2.%25p
  8. Habibi, H., Rahman, S., & Sahban, S. (2023). The effectiveness of corruption crime investigations in the sector of procurement of government goods and services (Case study at Poso Police). Iblam Law Review, 3(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i3.161
  9. Handoyo, S., & Antoni, H. (2021). Penguatan karakter siswa pada satuan pendidikan di Kota Bogor melalui pendidikan anti korupsi (Peraturan Wali Kota Bogor Nomor 28 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Anti Korupsi pada Satuan Pendidikan). Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 7(2), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.3589
  10. Hidayati, N., & Mulyadi, J. M. V. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi fraud dalam kegiatan pengadaan barang dan jasa. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 4(02), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.v4i02.201
  11. Kadek Frediandrika Adnantara. (2025). Dinamika penegakan hukum dan komisi pemberantasan korupsi yang tegas, cepat. Yustitia, 20(1), 1–14.
  12. Magakwe, J. (2023). The root causes of corruption in public procurement: A global perspective. Corruption - New Insights. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105941
  13. Maksum, U., & Suparno, S. (2025). Synergy of administrative and criminal law enforcement as an effort to prevent and eradicate corruption in procurement of goods and services in government environment. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 4(6), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v4i6.473
  14. Mudakh, A. C., Fallo, D. F. N., & Leo, R. P. (2025). Analisis hukum pidana terhadap kasus korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa (Studi kasus benih bawang merah Malaka). Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(1), 320.
  15. Nurfadillah, V., Aresta, F., Windyana, P., & Aulia, S. (2025). Akuntabilitas TNI dan Polri dalam kasus pelanggaran hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 1132–1143.
  16. Ridwan, R., Thalib, H., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Fungsi kepolisian dalam penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 1(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlt.v1i1.59
  17. Saputra, I., & Budiyono, H. S. T. (2023). Prevention of corruption by the prosecutor’s office based on an integrated preventive criminal justice system in Indonesia. Russian Law Journal, XI(5), 81–90. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/prevention-of-corruption-by-the-prosecutors-office-based-on-an-integrated-preventive-criminal-justice-system-in-indonesia/viewer
  18. Suryani, P., & Gaol, L. L. (2025). Leadership and fraud: A phenomenological study in Bengkulu provincial government. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 26(2), 720–742. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v26i2.25079
  19. Tauhid, T., & Mukhlis, I. (2020). Strategi kebudayaan dalam pemberantasan korupsi pada birokrasi pemerintahan Kota Bima. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 17(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.59050/jian.v17i1.71
  20. Wardhani, I. I., Pratami, A., & Pratama, I. (2021). E-procurement sebagai upaya pencegahan fraud terhadap pengadaan barang dan jasa di Unit Layanan Pengadaan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 7(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.31289/jab.v7i2.5293
  21. Widjaja, G. (2025). Transparency in government procurement of goods and services: Challenges and solutions. International Journal of Society Reviews (INJOSER), 3(6), 1101–1109.