Section Articles

The Liability of Curators for Share Capital Deposits: A Study on the Bankruptcy of PT Alam Galaxy as Debt

Alexander Sutomo
alexandersutomo22@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Richard C. Adam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, a curator in bankruptcy proceedings should act transparently, accountably, and professionally so that all company assets, including share deposit funds, are managed in accordance with legal provisions without causing harm to any party. However, the reality shows deviations, as in the bankruptcy case of PT Alam Galaxy, where share deposit funds were converted into debt with inflated values, even involving alleged document forgery and creditor claim mark-ups. This study aims to analyze the curator’s liability for share deposit funds recognized as debt in the bankruptcy case of PT Alam Galaxy based on Decision Number 54/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Surabaya. In addition, it examines the legal implications of recognizing capital deposits as debt for the legal position of the company, creditors, and shareholders. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, supported by analysis of official court documents, literature, and bankruptcy law principles. The findings indicate that curators are obliged to bear responsibility for negligence or actions that cause losses to the bankrupt estate as regulated under Article 72 of the Bankruptcy Law and may even be held personally liable under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Furthermore, the recognition of share deposit funds as debt leads the company into insolvency, disrupts the corporate capital structure, and undermines legal protection for creditors and shareholders.

Keywords

Liability Curator Bankruptcy

Article Details

How to Cite
Sutomo, A., & C. Adam, R. (2025). The Liability of Curators for Share Capital Deposits: A Study on the Bankruptcy of PT Alam Galaxy as Debt. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(2), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.12439

References

  1. Astiti, S. H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kurator Berdasarkan Prinsip Independensi Menurut Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.2.2016.277-298
  2. Asyidqi, A. T., Safitri, N., Suryanti, N., & Yuanitasari, D. (2023). Upaya Hukum bagi Pihak Debitur atas Kesalahan Penaksiran Nilai Utang oleh Kurator Berdasarkan Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v4i2.278
  3. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.
  4. Dirgantara, F., Putra, A. R., Darmawan, D., Khayru, R. K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2025). Peran Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang di Indonesia. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v4i1.1444
  5. Firmansyah, A., & Santoso, A. N. M. P. (2024). Strategi Penghindaran Pajak: Dampaknya terhadap Biaya Utang dan Implikasi Audit. Substansi: Sumber Artikel Akuntansi Auditing dan Keuangan Vokasi, 8(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.47731/subs.v8i2.3130
  6. Herlina, H., Abbas, I., & Risma, A. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kurator atas Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56087/qawaninjih.v3i2.375
  7. Hindrawan, P., Sunarmi, S., Ginting, B., & Harianto, D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Menerapkan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Parte dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(8), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i8.223
  8. Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996
  9. Kurnaliah, K., & Aminah, A. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Akta Pengakuan Hutang (Studi Putusan MA No. 04/PDT.G/2017/PN.Btg). Notarius, 17(3), 2283–2298. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.52313
  10. Maruli, J. S. M. T., Damian, E., Nainggolan, B., Panjaitan, H., & Johnstone, C. J. (2025). From Failure to Future Reconstructing Intellectual Property in Bankruptcy Law. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(1), 279–318. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i1.569
  11. Mulya, J. F., Abubakar, L., & Afriana, A. (2024). Praktik Konversi Utang Menjadi Saham sebagai Penerapan Prinsip Business Going Concern dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(4), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2142
  12. Palallo, R. D., Saptono, H., & Mas’ut, M. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Perkara Kepailitan PT Alam Galaxy Terkait Perbuatan Pengurus yang Menyebabkan Debitor Pailit (Studi Putusan 54/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Surabaya). _017 DG 2025 [Other, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro]. https://eprints2.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/31200/
  13. Siahaan, G. P., Sunarmi, S., Ginting, B., & Siregar, M. (2024). Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas yang Diakibatkan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i3.292
  14. Siahaan, Y. T. B., & Silaen, A. P. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kurator terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Proses Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.175-191
  15. Suryanti, N., Yuanitasari, D., & Kusmayanti, H. (2025). The Status of Property Granted in The Provisions of Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 13(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i1.1593
  16. Waisapi, J. Y. (2023). The Role of Curators and Liquidators in Solving Problems Insolvent Limited Liability Company. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 3(2), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i2.760
  17. Wijaya, C. A., & Adam, R. C. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur dalam Perjanjian Perdamaian dengan Metode Debt Into Shares Conversion Berdasarkan Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Nomor 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(1), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3070