Section Articles

The Legal Construction of Guardianship in Relation to the Temporary Suspension of Notaries: An Analysis of Article 9 Paragraph (1) Letter b of Law Number 2 of 2014

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.13070
Fara Jane
fara.217241064@stu.untar.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu
Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 19, 2025
Accepted
Jan 3, 2026
Published
Jan 4, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 34 Download : 15

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, the regulation of guardianship in Article 9 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries is designed to ensure that notaries possess adequate mental and professional capacity before performing their duties or being temporarily suspended. However, in reality, a normative gap exists: the definition of guardianship still relies on classical civil law, independent medical verification guidelines are absent, and administrative procedures are often subjective, risking violations of administrative justice principles. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of guardianship and to formulate a new interpretative model that integrates legal perspectives, administrative practices, and evidence-based decision medical verification. The study employs a qualitative library research methodology. Primary sources include the Notary Law, Civil Code, and legal doctrines, while secondary sources consist of scientific journals, policy reports, and contemporary psychiatric literature. Data analysis was conducted through content analysis and comparative methods, validated using literature triangulation. The findings suggest that guardianship should be assessed based on contextual functional capacity rather than normative status, allowing temporary suspension to be applied fairly, proportionally, and based on evidence, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the Notary Law and protecting the notary profession.

Keywords

Guardianship Functional Capacity Administrative Justice

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Jane, F., & Farma Rahayu, M. I. (2026). The Legal Construction of Guardianship in Relation to the Temporary Suspension of Notaries: An Analysis of Article 9 Paragraph (1) Letter b of Law Number 2 of 2014. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 18(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.13070

References

  1. Archqueta, N. D. P. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Pailit terhadap Jabatan Notaris dan Akta yang Dibuatnya (Studi Putusan Nomor 20/Pdt. Sus-PKPU/2020/Pn Niaga Sby). Indonesian Journal of Islamic and Social Science, 2(2), 80–91.
  2. Ariwangsa, I. D. G. A., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2024). Pengaturan Persekutuan Perdata Notaris Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(01), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2024.v09.i01.p8
  3. Dento, A. (2025). Prosedur Pemberhentian Sementara Notaris dalam Perspektif Due Process of Law. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1803
  4. Latifa, S., Khairani, & Syofyan, S. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melanggar Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus Dikota Padang). Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 9(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.31933/5s2e4b11
  5. Lubis, I., Lubis, D. I. S., & Lubis, A. H. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Cyber Notary Law Untuk Menjaga Kepercayaan, Integritas dan Keadilan Dalam Sistem Hukum. Notaire, 8(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v8i1.64253
  6. Maharani, C. L., Susanti, D. O., & Ali, M. (2022a). Pengampuan sebagai Dasar Pemberhentian Sementara dari Jabatan Notaris. Syntax Idea, 4(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v4i1.1712
  7. Maharani, C. L., Susanti, D. O., & Ali, M. (2022b). Pengampuan sebagai Dasar Pemberhentian Sementara dari Jabatan Notaris. Syntax Idea, 4(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v4i1.1712
  8. Moynihan, G., O’Reilly, K., O’Connor, J., & Kennedy, H. G. (2018). An evaluation of functional mental capacity in forensic mental health practice: The Dundrum capacity ladders validation study. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1658-2
  9. Mulia, H. I., Wirya, A., Octavian, Y., Gunawan, R., Gooding, P., & Walvisch, J. (2024). Assessment of the Guardianship System for Persons with Psychosocial Disability in Indonesia. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.942
  10. Najmuddin, M. (2025). Peran Notaris dalam Mendukung Implementasi Online Single Submission (OSS) dalam Pendirian Perizinan Badan Usaha di Batam.
  11. Pemberhentian Seorang Notaris Akibat Ditaruh di Bawah Pengampuan. (2019). [Thesis, Universitas Airlangga]. http://lib.unair.ac.id
  12. Polii, F. A. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Diberhentikan Sementara Dari Jabatannya Karena Berada Dalam Pengampuan Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Yang Pernah Dibuatnya.
  13. Shalihah, S. A. (2023). Analisis Notaris yang Diberhentikan Sementara dari Jabatannya karena Melakukan Tindak Pidana. Officium Notarium, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol3.iss1.art1
  14. Tumundo, C. B. N. (2021). Pemberhentian Sementara Notaris dari Jabatannya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lex Administratum, 9(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/33233
  15. Turner-Stokes, L., Benaichouche-Motam, K., Goodison, W., Altaie, A., Howard, A., McKnight, P., & Alfonso, J. (2024). Improving the systematic screening and documentation of mental capacity for patients with severe brain injury: The Mental Capacity Screening assessment tool (MCScreen). Clinical Medicine, 24(5), 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236
  16. Yumna, L. A., & Badriyah, S. M. (2025). Implikasi Hukum dan Perlindungan Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Adanya Pembatalan Akta Jaminan Fidusia yang dibuat Notaris di Luar Wilayah Jabatannya dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(3), 2530–2537. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.4409
  17. Yunari, S. B. (2019). Rekonsepsi Kepatutan dan Kewajaran pada Pengaturan Pendanaan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan guna Mewujudkan Welfare Society [Disertasi]. Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
  18. Yuswanti, A., & Santiago, F. (2024). Legal Protection Reform for Notaries Regarding Time Limits on Authority | Journal of Comprehensive Science. https://jcs.greenpublisher.id/index.php/jcs/article/view/2916?utm_source
  19. Zaki, M., & Saidin, S. (2024). Legal Protection and Law Assistance to Notaries as a Public Official in Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.17276