Section Articles

Legal Protection for First Trademark Registrants: An Analysis of the Substantive Examination System of Trademarks in Indonesia

Cevin Christian Alexsander
cevinnn04@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Christine S. T. Kansil

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, Indonesia’s substantive trademark examination system should provide full protection for the first applicant by ensuring that every application is thoroughly reviewed to prevent overlap, similarity, and potential conflicts with previously registered marks. However, in practice, several issues still arise, including the approval of marks with substantial similarity, inconsistent assessment standards, and the growing number of trademark disputes indicating weaknesses in the implementation of substantive examination. This study aims to analyze the extent to which the substantive examination system ensures legal protection for the first applicant and to identify factors contributing to legal uncertainty. The research employs a normative juridical method by examining statutory regulations, trademark dispute decisions, and academic literature related to trademark protection practices. The findings reveal that although Indonesia adopts the first-to-file principle which should theoretically ensure legal certainty the effectiveness of its implementation remains hindered by examination quality, limited institutional resources, and insufficient harmonization with international standards. This study highlights the need to strengthen the substantive examination system so that legal protection for first applicants can be achieved consistently and fairly.

Keywords

Substantive Examination First-to-File Trademark Protection

Article Details

How to Cite
Christian Alexsander, C., & S. T. Kansil, C. (2025). Legal Protection for First Trademark Registrants: An Analysis of the Substantive Examination System of Trademarks in Indonesia. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(2), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.13263

References

  1. Abdurrahman. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan dalam Pendidikan Islam. Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563
  2. Adeffian, C., & Apriani, R. (2023). Metode Pendekatan Per Se Illegal and Rule of Reason Terkait Penegakan Hukum Alternatif Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah, 9(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.37567/shar-e.v9i2.2227
  3. Alamsyah, E., & Oktobera, Y. A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Terdaftar Terhadap Pelanggaran Merek Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Merek Indonesia. Jurnal de Facto, 9(1).
  4. Anshary, M. R., Isradjuningtias, A. C., & Lekosono, A. B. (2024). Kajian Terhadap Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Preventif terhadap Merek Dagang di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Humaniorum, 1(4), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v1i4.33
  5. Dwisvimiar, I., & Elfira, D. (2024). Merancang Konsep Standar Pemeriksaan Substantif Merek: Belajar dari Kasus Merek M&G. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 31(1), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss1.art7
  6. Marlina, A., Ramli, A. M., & Mayana, R. F. (2025). Eksistensi Oposisi dan Transparansi Putusan Pemeriksaan Substantif Merek Dagang Sebagai Langkah Preventif Pemalsuan Merek Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 15(8). https://doi.org/Prefix%2520doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461
  7. Nadhila Cahya Nurmalasari & Yudho Taruno Muryanto. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Prinsip First to File Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Preventif: Studi Atas Sengketa Merek Antara MS GLOW Dan PS GLOW. Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v1i2.191
  8. Nola Aristyani. (2024). Tantangan Pengembangan Industri Ekonomi Kreatif Melalui Pembiayaan Berbasis Hak Cipta. Yayasan Daarul Huda Krueng Mane, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14504396
  9. Putri Lubis, F. Z., & Rahaditya, R. (2023). Implementasi Prinsip First to Use Pada Pembatalan Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(5), 3217–3228. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11807
  10. RobbyHidayat, D., Fuad, F., & Suartini, S. (2024). Pemeriksaan Substantif Dalam Sengketa Hak Merek Menurut Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.710
  11. Saidin, O., & Sihombing, H. V. (2024). Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Produk Kecap Babon Terdaftar. Sriwijaya Journal of Private Law, 1(2).
  12. Simaela, S. W., Matuankotta, J. K., & Kuahaty, S. S. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Kepemilikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang telah dialihkan Tanpa sepengetahuan Kreditur. Tatohi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i2.1559
  13. Wibowo, S. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Merek Dagang Terdaftar dengan Penerapan Prinsip First to File terhadap Pihak Lain (Studi Kasus Putusan MA Nomor 161 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023). Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia, 3(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v3i2.1675