Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the presidential threshold system in the 2019 simultaneous elections in terms of the perspective of the maqasid shariah. The implementation of the Presidential threshold in the 2019 concurrent elections, the level of benefit and interpretations, including in the dharuriyyah.  aspects. The enactment shows that there is a positive and negative impact, but the election must be continued. This is very important because it involves all aspects of the lives of Indonesian citizens, both in terms of security, protection, religion, culture, economy, law, politics and so on. Then also, the implementation of the Presidential threshold system in the 2019 simultaneous elections, the scope of benefits arising into the category of maqashid al-‘Ammah (General maqashid) which is a maqashid which covers all problems contained in the behavior of tashri’ 'which are universal such as justice, equality, tolerance, convenience and others, although it was rarely discussed and raised at the research level.

Keywords

presidential threshold election maqashid syari’ah

Article Details

How to Cite
Ansori, S. A. (2020). MAQASHID SYARIAH DAN PRAKTIK SISTEM PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DI INDONESIA: . Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan, Dan Ekonomi Islam, 12(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v12i1.1539

References

  1. Abdullah, Rozali. 2009. Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Lebih Berkualitas: Pemilu Legislatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  2. Amirudin, Ibramsyah. 2008. Kedudukan KPU dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama.
  3. Auda, Jasser. 2015. “Maqashid Syaria as Philosophy of Islamic Law: a Systems Approach”, terj. Rosidin dan ‘Ali ‘Abed El-Mun’in, Membumikan Hukum Islam Melalui Maqashid Syari’ah. Bandung: Mizan.
  4. Chidmad, Tataq. 2004. Kritik Terhadap Pemilihan Langsung. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.
  5. Fuqaha. 2017. Pengisian Jabatan Presiden dan Presidential threshold Dalam Demokrasi Konstitusional di Indonesia. Jurnal Ajudikasi. Vol. 1 No. 2.
  6. Huda, Ni’matul. 2011. Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindi Persada.
  7. Kelsen, Hans. 2011. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media.
  8. Labolo, Muhammad & Ilham. 2015. Teguh, Partai Politik dan Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia: Teori, Konsep dan Isu Strategis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  9. Mahdi, Imam. 2011. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Teras.
  10. M.D. Mahfud. 2006. Dasar dan Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
  11. Mukhtarrija, Muhammad et.al. 2017. Inefektifitas Pengaturan Presidential threshold dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 24 No. IV.
  12. Mu’ammar, M. Arfan, et.al. 2012. Studi Islam: Perspektif Insider/Outsider. Yogyakarya: IRCiSoD.
  13. Oetama, Jacoub. 2001. Suara Nurani: Tajuk Rencana Pilihan 1999-2001. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
  14. Bowler, Shaun & Bernard Grofman (ed). 2000. Election in Australia, Ireland and Malta underthe Single Trasferable Vote. USA: The University of Michigan Press.