Section Articles

Annulment of Marriage Because of Threats in Langsa City

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v14i2.4718
Muhammad Rusdi Muhammaddiah
muhammadrusdibinmuhammaddiah@hotmail.com (Primary Contact)
Ez-Zitouna University, Tunisia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 22, 2022
Accepted
Dec 29, 2022
Published
Dec 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 193 Download : 88

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to answer questions regarding the consideration of the judges of the Langsa City Syar'iyyah Court in the Decision Number: 0101/Pdt.G/2016/Ms-Lgs considering the annulment of marriages due to threats. The research method of this research is the normative juridical method. The researcher obtains the primary data from the Decision of the Syar'iyyah Court of Langsa City Number: 0101/Pdt.G/2016/Ms-Lgs. Based on the results, then there are two conclusions can be drawn. First, the judge's consideration in deciding the case based on two factors, those are the consideration of facts and legal considerations as stipulated in Articles 24 and 25, and Article 27 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Second, the Panel of Judges has also carried out a mediation process against the Petitioner and the Respondent, but in that case the Respondent was never present at the trial and a summons was made by the court properly and officially. Therefore, the Syar'iyyah Court of Langsa City decides to grant the Petitioner's claim and annul the marriage that had occurred and stated that the Marriage Certificate between the Petitioner and the Respondent had no legal force.

Keywords

Marriage Annulment Threats Judge's Consideration

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Muhammaddiah, M. R. (2022). Annulment of Marriage Because of Threats in Langsa City . Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 14(2), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v14i2.4718

References

  1. Amdani, Y. (2016). IMPLIKASI PENAFSIRAN UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH HAKIM PRAPERADILAN DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15872
  2. Aulia, T. R. N. (2009). Kompilasi hukum Islam: hukum Perkawinan, Kewarisan, dan Perwakafan: disertai dengan: undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, undang-undang nomor 41 tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf, undang-undang nomor 38 tahun 1999 tentang Penggunaan Zakat. Nuansa Aulia.
  3. Endrawati, L., Aprilianda, N., & Farikha, M. (2015). REKONSTRUKSI MODEL PUTUSAN HAKIM PERKARA KDRT MELALUI PENDEKATAN HUKUM PROGRESIF. Jurnal Media Hukum, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0048.73-94
  4. Gema, G., Brata, M., & Kenotariatan, S. M. (2019). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Pembatalan Perkawinan. Notarius, 12(1), 433–451.
  5. Ghozali, A. R. (2008). Fiqh Munakahat. cet. III. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
  6. Gulo, N. (2018). Disparitas dalam penjatuhan pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3), 215–227.
  7. Hanitijo, R. (1988). Metodologi penelitian hukum dan jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
  8. Harahap, Y. (1978). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. CV Zahir Tranding Co, Medan.
  9. Rahmatillah, D., & A.N Khofify. (2017). Konsep Pembatalan Perkawinan. Hukum Islam, XVII(2), 152–171.
  10. Rahmatillah, D., & Khofify, A. N. (2017). Konsep Pembatalan Perkawinan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1947 Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Hukum Islam, 17(2), 152–171.
  11. Respationo, H. M. S., & Hamzah, M. G. (2013). Putusan Hakim: Menuju Rasionalitas Hukum Refleksif Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2(2).
  12. Rusli, T. (2013). Pembatalan Perkawinan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Pranata Hukum, 8(2), 156–167.
  13. Subekti, T. (2010). Hukum keluarga dan Perkawinan. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto.
  14. Sudarsono. (2010). Hukum Perkawinan Nasional. In Rineka Cipta.
  15. Zaifudin, T. (2018). KEBENARAN FORMAL DALAM PEMBUKTIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v1i2.3962
  16. Zainuri, S. (2019). Status Perkawinan Suami Istri Pasca Pembatalan Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Ulumuddin : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 9(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v9i1.285
  17. Zein, S. E. M., & Aripin, J. (2004). Problematika hukum keluarga Islam kontemporer: analisis yurisprudensi dengan pendekatan ushuliyah. Diterbitkan atas kerja sama Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Jakarta dan ….