Section Articles

Multiplier Effect Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan

Penegakan Hukum, Pemberantasan Korupsi, dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat
https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.5966
Hanita Azrica
Kejaksaan Negeri Bireuen, Aceh, Indonesia
Rahmad Safitri
rahmad.safitri@iainlangsa.ac.id (Primary Contact)
IAIN Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
Muhammad Riza Muarrif
Angkara University, Angkara, Turki

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 27, 2023
Accepted
Dec 28, 2023
Published
Dec 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 343 Download : 191

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of asset recovery on the Bireuen District Attorney's Office on law enforcement and corruption eradication in the Bireuen Regency Government. This research is classified as literature research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is a normative juridical study of the Attorney General's Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Second Amendment to the Attorney General's Regulation Number PER-027/A/JA/ 10/2014 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery. The results of the study concluded that asset recovery by the Bireuen District Attorney's Office had a significant positive impact on law enforcement and corruption eradication in Bireuen Regency. Asset recovery strengthens public trust in law enforcement agencies, increases accountability, and reduces corruption.

Keywords

Multiplier Effect Asset Recovery Prosecution

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Azrica, H., Safitri, R., & Riza Muarrif, M. (2023). Multiplier Effect Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 15(2), 360-372. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.5966

References

  1. Amirulkamar, S., Sufrizal, & Anzaikhan, M. (2022). Sejarah Administrasi Pidana Islam dan Relevensinya Terhadap Penanggulangan Perkara di Aceh. Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v7i2.5377
  2. Anzaikhan, M., Bahri, S., & Sufrizal, S. (2023). Adaptation of Religious Moderation: Dispersion of Wasathiyah Islam as the Treasure of PTKIN in Aceh. Al-Qalam, 29(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v29i1.1242
  3. Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, P., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(1), Article 1. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/805
  4. Firdaus, A., & Prasetyo, H. (2021). Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Lintas Negara. Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v8i3.301-308
  5. Hamamah, F., & Bahtiar, H. H. (2019). Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v4i2.5375
  6. Husniah, H., Saharudddin, S., Anwar, K., & Juliansyah, H. (2023). Analisis Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Dan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Keluarga Di Kecamatan Gandapura Kabupaten Bireuen. Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu Ekonomi, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29103/jaie.v1i2.10322
  7. Jerman, H. (2017). Pemulihan Aset Hasil Kejahatan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(25), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v13i25.2228
  8. Justisia, U. J. of S. (2023). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Sektor Private Di Negara ASEAN. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(2), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.373
  9. Kabba, S. H., Arjaya, I. M., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Prosedur Pengembalian dan Pemulihan Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4139.573-579
  10. Karinda, F. J., Kristiawanto, K., & Ismed, M. (2022). Upaya Pemulihan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Guna Mengoptimalisasi Kerugian Keuangan Negara. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i5.27688
  11. Kurniawan, R. (2022). Dinamika pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia dalam perspektif sejarah politik: Komparasi Undang-Undang di Masa Orde Baru dan Masa Reformasi. Historiography: Journal of Indonesian History and Education, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17977/um081v2i12022p82-92
  12. Mahmud, A. (2018). Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262
  13. Mariana, D. (2022). Penyitaan Aset sebagai upaya Pemulihan Aset (Asset Recovery) dalam Rangka Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. JIIP; Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(8), 2928–2935. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i8.772
  14. Munti, F., & Fahlevi, H. (2017). Determinan Kinerja Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa: Studi pada Kecamatan Gandapura Kabupaten Bireuen Aceh. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 18(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.180281
  15. Parulina, J. R., Dwiwarno, N., & Paulus, D. H. (2023). Upaya Pemulihan Aset (Asset Recovery) Lintas Batas Negara Di Wilayah Asia Tenggara. Diponegoro Law Journal, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2023.35447
  16. Putra, I. G. A. H. A., Bagia, I. W., & Telagawati, N. L. W. S. (2019). Dampak Remunerasi terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 7(3), Article 3. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JMI/article/view/38398
  17. Sofwan, S. V., & Sulastri, T. (2019). Peran Pusat Pemulihan Aset Di Kejaksaan Negeri Bandung. AKURAT; Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10(3), Article 3. https://ejournal.unibba.ac.id/index.php/akurat/article/view/196
  18. Sosiawan, U. M. (2020). Penanganan Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Penerapan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.587-604
  19. Sulaksono, S., Novianto, W. T., & Supanto. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Pemulihan Aset Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Tercampur Dengan Aset Pelaku. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29202
  20. Sulastri, M., Claudia, T. C., & Safira, W. C. (2023). Optimalisasi Metode Digital Forensik Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Bentuk Bitcoin. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v11i1.1263
  21. Suseno, D. A. (2017). Multiplier Effect Sektor Basis Terhadap Perekonomian Daerah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal REP: Riset Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31002/rep.v2i2.227
  22. Suyatna, U. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora, 22(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v22i3.25047