Section Articles

Merebut Tafsiran Otoritatif Keagamaan; Perdebatan dan Kontroversi Prosesi Hukuman Ta'zir Cambuk di Lapas Aceh

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.8000
Faisal Yahya
UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
Husni Mubarrak
husni.mubarak@ar-raniry.ac.id (Primary Contact)
UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
Harjoni
IAIN Malikussaleh Lhokseumawe, Aceh, Indonesia
Muhammad Ridha
UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
Amir Muhammed Kafei Kjoor
Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, Sudan

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 16, 2024
Accepted
May 31, 2024
Published
Jun 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 272 Download : 122

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses the debates and controversies surrounding the authoritative interpretation of Sharia law regarding the caning punishment process in correctional facilities (prisons) in Aceh, which was previously conducted in open fields. The debate emerged and took place across various media platforms, including social media, following the issuance of the Aceh Governor's Regulation in 2018 concerning the relocation of the punishment process. The discussion extended to deliberating the most legitimate interpretation regarding the necessity for the caning punishment to be witnessed by a group of believers; the selection of the location where the punishment is carried out; and the intent and purpose of the caning punishment itself to be witnessed by the public, as explicitly stated in Q.S. An-Nur: 2. Using literature study as the research method, this article concludes that there has been a shift in religious interpretation towards authoritarianism by considering and asserting certain interpretations as authoritative and "supposedly" in accordance with Sharia, as intended by the implementation of the caning punishment during the formalization of Sharia law in Aceh.

Keywords

Caning Prison Authoritative Interpretatation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Yahya, F., Mubarrak, H., Harjoni, Ridha, M., & Kafei Kjoor, A. M. (2024). Merebut Tafsiran Otoritatif Keagamaan; Perdebatan dan Kontroversi Prosesi Hukuman Ta’zir Cambuk di Lapas Aceh. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(1), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.8000

References

  1. Ablisar, M. (2014). Relevansi Hukuman Cambuk Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Pemidanaan dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.296
  2. Abou El Fadl, K. (2001). And God knows the soldiers: The authoritative and authoritarian in Islamic discourses. University Press of America.
  3. Abou El Fadl, K. (2004). Atas Nama Tuhan: dari Fikih Otoriter ke Fikih Otoritatif. Serambi.
  4. Abubakar, A. Y. (2007). Syariat Islam di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam: Otonomi Khusus di Bidang Hukum. Sharia International Conference, 20.
  5. Abubakar, Ali, & Lubis, Z. (2019). Hukum Jinayat Aceh. Prenada Media.
  6. Abubakar, Ali. (2012). Kontroversi Hukuman Cambuk. Media Syariah, 14(1), 65–96. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jms.v14i1.1719
  7. Abubakar, Alyasa. (2006). Syariat Islam di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam: Paradigma, Kebijakan Dan Kegiatan. Dinas Syariat Islam.
  8. Adnan. (2018). Adab Menyaksikan Cambuk. Opini Serambi Indonesia.
  9. Al-‘Arabiy, Ibn. (t.th). Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
  10. Al-Jashash, A. bin A. (1992). Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar Ihya al-Turats al-‘Arabiy.
  11. Al-Qardhawy, Y. (2013). Bencana dan Syariat. Opini Serambi Indonesia.
  12. Al-Qurthubiy, M. bin A. (2014). Al-Jami’ li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar al-Ghad al-Jadid.
  13. Al-Razi, M. bin U. (1981). Al-Tafsir al-Kabir (Mafatih al-Ghayb). Dar el-Fikr.
  14. Armia, M. S. (2020). Public Caning: Should it Be Maintained or Eliminated? (A Reflection of Implementation Sharia Law in Indonesia). QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 7(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i2.4974
  15. Audah, A. Q. (2009). Al-Tasyri’ al-Jina’iy al-Islamiy Muqarinan bi al-Qanun al-Wadh’iy. Dar el-Hadith.
  16. Aziz, D. A. N., Al Khanif, Hartono, M. D., & Marbun, A. A. Y. (2023). Examining Qanun in Aceh from a human rights perspective: status, substance and impact on vulnerable groups and minorities. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 23(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V23I1.37-56
  17. Din, M. (2009). Stimulasi Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Nasional dari Aceh untuk Indonesia. Unpad Press.
  18. Din, M., & Abubakar, A. Y. (2021). The Position of the Qanun Jinayat as a Forum for the Implementation of Sharia in Aceh in the Indonesian Constitution. Samarah, 5(2), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10881
  19. Fadlia, F., Susilawati, N., Ramadani, I., & Sari, N. (2020). Deterring or Entertaining? Can the Caning Punishment Execution in Aceh Meet its Objective? Mazahib, 19(1), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v19i1.2055
  20. Faizin, D. (2021). Pandangan Ulama Aceh Terhadap Hukuman Cambuk di Penjara. Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam & Ekonomi, 10(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.47766/syarah.v10i1.219
  21. Huda, Y. (2020). Islamic Sharīa in Aceh and Its Implication in Other Regions in Indonesia: Case Study during Implementation Aceh as Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. PETITA, 5(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.98
  22. Interview Alyasa Abubakar, Akademisi, Wawancara pada September 2022 di Banda Aceh.
  23. Interview Amir Khalis, Hakim Mahkamah Syariah, Wawancara pada September 2022 di Banda Aceh.
  24. Interview Syahrizal Abbas, Mantan Kepala Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh dan Akademisi, Wawancara pada September 2022 di Banda Aceh.
  25. Iskandar, M., Azhari Yahya, Abdul Jalil Salam, & Junaidi. (2022). From the Public Space to the Prison Space: Regulation Polemic and the Implementation of Caning Law in Aceh. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 17(1), 216–241. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.5646
  26. Islam, F. F. (2016). Konsep Otoritas dan Otoritarianisme Penafsiran Khâled M. Abou el-Fadl. Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 4(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v4i1.53
  27. Jailani. (2018). Bolehkah ‘Uqubat Cambuk di dalam Lapas? Opini Serambi Indonesia.
  28. Latief, H. A., & Mubarrak, H. (2010). Sengkarut Hukuman Rajam dalam Rancangan Qanun Jinayat Aceh. Jurnal Sosio Religia, 9(3).
  29. Marpaung, M. M., & Susetyo, H. (2021). Canning: Syariah Law Versus Human Rights in Aceh, Indonesia. In Challenges of Law and Governance in Indonesia in the Disruptive Era II (pp. 117–128). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  30. Maulidia Zuhra, N. (2020). Penerapan Hukuman Cambuk Bagi Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Dalam Perkara Jinayat Dihubungkan Dengan Jaminan Akan Hak Asasi Manusia Atas Rasa Aman Dan Perlindungan Bagi Korban. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i2.3668
  31. Mubarrak, H., & Yahya, F. (2020). Women in the Public Sphere and Religious Discourse Interpretation in the Post-Conflict Aceh. Mazahib, 19(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v19i2.2204
  32. Muhtador, M. (2018). Pergulatan Otoritas dan Otoritarianisme dalam Penafsiran (Pembacaan Hermenuetis Khaled Abou El Fadl). QOF, 2(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v2i1.500
  33. Mulizar, M., Asmuni, A., & Tanjung, D. (2022). Maqashid Sharia Perspective of Legal Sanction for Khalwat Actors in Aceh. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3587
  34. Nafi’, H., Farizi, I. A., Salsabila, K., & Muhyi, A. A. (2024). Menegakkan Keadilan Dalam Islam: Pendekatan Tafsir Al-Qur’an Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia. Basha’ir: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.47498/bashair.v4i1.2981
  35. Nurdin, R., & Ridwansyah, M. (2020). Aceh, Qanun and National Law: Study on Legal Development Orientation. SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 4(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.6416
  36. Rahman, A. S., & Hendero, M. B. (2018). Hukuman Bagi Pezina dalam QS. An-nur Ayat 2 Menurut M. Quraish Shihab. Al-Qorni; Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(1), Article 1.
  37. Salma, Fajri, A., Hidayat, T., & Safri, E. (2022). The Other Side of the History of the Formulation of Aceh Jinayat Qanun. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.21000
  38. Syarief, M. (2023). Hukuman Cambuk di Aceh (Studi Analisis Mempersaksikan Hukuman Cambuk di Tempat Terbuka). Pascasarjana UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
  39. Syarifuddin, S. (2015). Hermeneutika Khaled Abou El Fadl. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 17(2), 231–244.
  40. Yahya, F. (2022). Dialectic of Caning Punishment in Aceh: Contestation Between Text and Context. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 7(2), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v7i2.15369
  41. Zulfikar, & Anshari, M. N. A. (2021). Public Punishment and Self-defense Mechanism on Caning in Aceh. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 13(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v13i2.3713