Section Articles

Contextualization of Polygamy Law; Justification of Islamic Legal Principles against Positive Regulations in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8108
Muhammad Nur
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Aceh Tamiang Islamic College, Aceh, Indonesian
Dhiaudin Tanjung
North Sumatra State Islamic University, Medan, Indonesian

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Feb 10, 2024
Accepted
Jul 21, 2024
Published
Jul 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 87 Download : 49

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, polygamy law in Islam sets a maximum limit of four wives, requires the husband to act justly, and considers material and emotional factors, as stipulated in the Qur'an. However, in reality, there are differences in the implementation of the law in Indonesia. Law No. 1 of 1974 does not limit the number of wives, while the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) limits it to four wives and requires the wife's consent, which must be proven in court. These differences reflect a discrepancy between Islamic legal principles and current positive regulations. This article aims to provide a deeper understanding of the differences between polygamy law in Islam and positive regulations in Indonesia. This research uses a comparative approach with a literature study method to analyze and compare Islamic legal principles with positive regulations in Indonesia related to polygyny. The results show that over time and with changes in the state system, the contextualization of polygamy law has undergone justification and rationalization, leading to significant changes in its application.

Keywords

Polygamy Contextualization Positive Law Islamic Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Nur, M., & Tanjung, D. (2024). Contextualization of Polygamy Law; Justification of Islamic Legal Principles against Positive Regulations in Indonesia. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8108

References

  1. Amirulkamar, S., Iskandar, I., Zuhrah, F., & Anzaikhan, M. (2023). Administration Reagent of Aceh Family Law Qanun: Siri Marriage Motives Towards the Legality of Polygyny. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i1.21352
  2. Ardhian, R. F., Anugrah, S., & Bima, S. (2016). Poligami dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Serta Urgensi Pemberian Izin Poligam di Pengadilan Agama. Privat Law, 3(2), 164461.
  3. Auliani, F., Layyina, U., Arrisha, M., & Nisa, H. (2021). Poligami dan Ketahanan Keluarga Masyarakat Aceh. Musãwa; Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2021.201.59-68
  4. Darmawijaya, E. (2015). Poligami Dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif (Tinjauan Hukum Keluarga Turki, Tunisia dan Indonesia). Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v1i1.621
  5. Fata, A. K., & Mustofa, M. (2013). Menyoal Kontekstualisasi Hukum Islam tentang Poligami. Al-Ulum, 13(2), Article 2.
  6. Hamim, A., & Faisal, A. (2022). Perbandingan Penerapan Hukum Keluarga Di Mesir Dan Di Indonesia. As-Syams, 3(2), Article 2. https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/AS-SYAMS/article/view/312
  7. Heath, R., Hidrobo, M., & Roy, S. (2020). Cash transfers, polygamy, and intimate partner violence: Experimental evidence from Mali. Journal of Development Economics, 143, 102410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102410
  8. Hendri, A. (2018). Poligami Perspektif Kitab al-Tafsīr al-Wasīt li al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v3i1.3128
  9. Husaidi, H., Andika, S., Trisdiani, C., Hasan, K., & Maulida, D. (2020). Pro-Kontra Wacana Pelegalan Poligami Dalam Aturan Daerah (Qanun) Di Tanah Rencong Aceh. Source: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.35308/source.v6i2.2598
  10. Juita, R., Muhammad, R. A., & Jauhari, I. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Pernikahan Melalui Qadhi Liar (Studi Penelitian di Kabupaten Aceh Besar). Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i2.8476
  11. Keri, I., Misbahuddin, D., & Haddade, D. W. (2022). Kontekstualisasi Teologi Keadilan Dalam Hukum Qishash Dan Poligami. Al-Syakhshiyyah; Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v4i2.2950
  12. Khoiriyah, S. L. (2017). Pemikiran Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid Tentang Poligami Dan Relevansinya Dengan Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2017.10103
  13. Mamnuniyatilah, M., & Andaryuni, L. (2022). Hukum Keluarga di Tunisia: Sebuah Studi Kepustakaan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v3i2.321
  14. Mardi. (2019). Problematika Hukum Poligami Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Al-Ibrah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keilmuan Islam, 4(2), Article 2.
  15. Rubama, Rasyidin, Abdillah, M. A., & Hasan, M. R. (2024). Taik Sangka in Gayo Customary Law: The Urf Approach and Its Implications. AJIL: Aceh Journal of Islamic Law, 1(1), Article 1.
  16. Sufrizal, Azmi, U., & Anzaikhan, M. (2022). Pro dan Kontra Usia Perkawinan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v14i1.5378
  17. Syahriza, R. (2018). Analisis Teks Hadis tentang Poligami dan Implikasinya. Al-Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i2.471
  18. Syam, M. M., & Syachrofi, M. (2019). Hadis-Hadis Poligami (Aplikasi Metode Pemahaman Hadis Muhammad al-Ghazali). Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v4i1.6018
  19. Yasin, D. T. (2018). Menelisik Pesan Sosial Poligami dalam KHI. Jurnal Al Himayah, 2(1), Article 1. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/581
  20. Zukhdi, D. M. (2020). Transformasi Poligami Dalam Bingkai Syari’at Islam Di Aceh. TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 2(1), 15–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/taqnin.v2i1.7434
  21. Zulfikar. (2022). Perempuan Dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam; Zakir Naik Perspektif. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v9i1.4197
  22. Zulyadain, Z. (2019). Poligami; antara Tuntunan Syara’ dan Problem Sosial: Studi Kasus dalam Rumah Tangga di Kota Palopo. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v11i2.164