Section Articles

Analisis Yuridis Peralihan Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Ketiga Tanpa Sepengetahuan Kreditur

Yafiz Arya Dharma
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Syaddan Dintara Lubis

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of the transfer of fiduciary collateral to a third party without the creditor's knowledge and the debtor's responsibility for such actions. The issue arises when a fiduciary creditor executes a process that violates existing procedures and regulations by seizing the collateral without selling or auctioning it. This execution is carried out due to time and cost considerations that are disproportionate to the expected results. The research employs a normative juridical approach, reviewing literature sources, including the Civil Code and Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The study finds that fiduciary registration is a matter of publicity, meaning that all parties are deemed to be aware of the existence of fiduciary collateral through public access. Therefore, third parties transferring fiduciary objects must examine them carefully. The debtor's responsibility for transferring fiduciary collateral without the creditor's consent involves both civil and criminal consequences. This study highlights the importance of adhering to legal procedures to protect creditor rights and ensure debtor responsibility in fiduciary transactions.

Keywords

Juridical Analysis Fiduciary Guarantee Creditor

Article Details

How to Cite
Arya Dharma, Y., & Dintara Lubis, S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Peralihan Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Ketiga Tanpa Sepengetahuan Kreditur. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8555

References

  1. Lasori, S. A., Yunus, Y., & Nurdin, R. A. (2021). Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Debitur Kepada Pihak Ketiga Tanpa Persetujuan Kreditur. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 7(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i4.566
  2. UUJF. (1999). Undang-Undang No 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jdih, 1, 1–5.
  3. Lasori, S. A., Yunus, Y., & Nurdin, R. A. (2021). Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Debitur Kepada Pihak Ketiga Tanpa Persetujuan Kreditur. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 7(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i4.566
  4. UUJF. (1999). Undang-Undang No 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jdih, 1, 1–5.
  5. Abdullah, J. (2016). Jaminan Fidusia Di Indonesia (Tata Cara Pendaftaran Dan Eksekusi). BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Islam, 4(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v4i2.2693
  6. Lidya Mahendra, RA Retno Murni, and Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa, “Perlindungan Hak-Hak Kreditur Dalam Hal Adanya Pengalihan Benda Jaminan Oleh Pihak Debitur,” Acta Comitas:Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
  7. Junaidi. (2022). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Indramayu: Adanu Abimat.
  8. Nasihan, M. (2012). Segala hal tentang hukum lembaga pembiayaan . Yogyakarta: buku pintar.
  9. Kamello, H. Tan, and M. S. Sh.(2022). Hukum jaminan fidusia suatu kebutuhan yang didambakan. Penerbit Alumni.
  10. Mertokusumo, B, S. (1988). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
  11. Badrulzaman, M,D. (1983). Mencuri Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional.Bandung: Alumni.
  12. J. Satrio. 2002. Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.
  13. Apeldoom, V. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
  14. Raden Subekti and Raden Citrosudibio. (1986). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata:Dengan Undang-Undang Perkahwinan. Pradnya Paramita.