Section Articles

Eksternalisasi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Terorisme dalam Perspektif Pidana Islam: Studi Komparasi Indonesia dan Mesir

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8854
Riski Adelina
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
North Sumatra State Islamic University, Medan, Indonesian
Zulkarnain
North Sumatra State Islamic University, Medan, Indonesian

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 25, 2024
Accepted
Jul 21, 2024
Published
Jul 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 100 Download : 52

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

As part of the global community, the death penalty for terrorism should ideally comply with international standards that respect human rights and justice. However, in Indonesia and Egypt, the implementation of the death penalty is often influenced by external and internal factors that deviate from these principles. This study aims to analyze how externalization affects the implementation of the death penalty for terrorism from the perspective of Islamic criminal law in Indonesia and Egypt. This article is classified as library research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is a comparative study explained through descriptive analysis. The findings show that both countries are influenced by external pressures, with Indonesia experiencing tension between national policies and international standards, while Egypt struggles to balance Sharia principles with global demands. Although there are similarities in the impact of externalization, differences in implementation reflect the diversity of responses to international pressure within the context of Islamic criminal law.

Keywords

Externalization Terrorism Indonesia Egypt

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Adelina, R., & Zulkarnain. (2024). Eksternalisasi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Terorisme dalam Perspektif Pidana Islam: Studi Komparasi Indonesia dan Mesir. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 288-306. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8854

References

  1. Ayusriadi, A., Razak, A., & Hamid, M. A. (2018). Perspektif Hukum Islam Terhadap Hukuman Mati Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Terkait Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v7i2.5364
  2. Fanani, M. Ri. A. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme Ditinjau dari Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Pidana Islam. CLEAR: Criminal Law Review, 1(2), Article 2.
  3. Fawaid, B. (2020). QiṢāṢ Pada Tindak Pembunuhan; Konsep Dan Praktik Pada Masa Nabi Muhammad SAW. Sosio Dialektika, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31942/sd.v5i1.3469
  4. Fraja, S. I. N., Saraswati, N. A. R., & Masitoh, U. A. (2021). Perbandingan Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia dan Belanda. Diversi: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v7i1.1117
  5. Insani, N., Mutiara, U., & Haritsa, H. (2023). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.4062
  6. Keri, I., Misbahuddin, D., & Haddade, D. W. (2022). Kontekstualisasi Teologi Keadilan Dalam Hukum Qishash Dan Poligami. Al-Syakhshiyyah; Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v4i2.2950
  7. Mohamed, G. (2017). Reforming the Death Penalty in Egypt: An Islamic Law Perspective. Maurer Theses and Dissertations. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/etd/52
  8. Mulkan, H. (2019). Hukuman Mati Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam. Doctrinal, 4(1), Article 1. https://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/doktrinal/article/view/1863/1529
  9. Musyafa’ah, N. (2012). Penerapan Syari’at Islam di Mesir. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 2(2), 208–236. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2012.2.2.208-236
  10. Novianti, L. (2023). Pidana Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Dihubungkan dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i1.221
  11. Nurdin, F. S. (2020). Kontra antara Legem dan Ius pada Peristiwa Bom Bali I. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v5i1.3521
  12. Pertiwi, Y. A., Widodo, P., & Priyanto, P. (2023). Pengaruh Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) Terhadap Perkembangan Ancaman Terorisme di Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i2.2023.796-802
  13. Rachma, A. D. (2020). Perbandingan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia dan Filipina. Jurnal Pembaharu Hukum, 1(1), 1–23.
  14. Rahmadiana, A. (2021). Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Peradilan Pidana Islam di Negara Republik Arab Mesir dan Negara Republik Indonesia (Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam). Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v7i2.212
  15. Rante, D. Y., Rahman, S., & Badaru, B. (2022). Penerapan Pidana Mati Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 3(9), Article 9.
  16. Schabas, W. A. (2002). The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494109
  17. Serbabagus, S., Andreianto, F. D., Munir, A., & Hudi, M. (2024). Enforcement of Reduced Punishment for Perpetrators of Terrorism Crimes against Death Penalty Punishment. JHR; Jurnal Hukum Replik, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v12i1.10361
  18. Setyalaksono, L. F. (2024). Comparison of the Implementation of the Death Penalty Against Perpetrators of Corruption Crimes as an Extraordinary Crime Based on Legislation in Indonesia and Other Countries. Ratio Legis Journal, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%p
  19. Sunandar. (2022). Perbandingan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Antara Hukum Di Indonesia Dan Mesir Serta Relevansinya Dengan Konsepsi Hak Asasi Manusia (1, Universitas Islam Negeri Wali Songo). https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/ajil
  20. Syalsabila, A. N. (2022). Analisis Kasus Bom Bali sebagai Problematika Hak Asasi Manusia. Konstruksi Sosial: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.56393/konstruksisosial.v1i7.1318