Section Articles

Analysis of Evidence Seizure in Money Laundering Crimes: Procedures, Legitimacy, and Its Impact on Legal Proceedings

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9856
Phireri Phireri
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
Asti Dwiyanti
Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 19, 2024
Accepted
Dec 29, 2024
Published
Dec 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 120 Download : 54

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, the seizure of evidence in Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU) should be conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations to ensure the validity of evidence that can be used in legal proceedings. In reality, numerous issues arise regarding the regulation and procedures for evidence seizure, which often impact the validity of the evidence. This study aims to analyze the regulations and procedures for evidence seizure in TPPU cases and their implications for the validity of evidence in legal processes. This article is categorized as library research using a qualitative approach. The methodology employed is normative juridical analysis. The findings reveal that evidence seizure in TPPU cases is often not conducted in accordance with established procedures, thereby potentially undermining the validity of the evidence. The money laundering process, which consists of the placement, layering, and integration stages, frequently involves suspicious transactions that require stricter supervision.

Keywords

Seizure Evidence Money Laundering

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Phireri, P., & Dwiyanti, A. (2024). Analysis of Evidence Seizure in Money Laundering Crimes: Procedures, Legitimacy, and Its Impact on Legal Proceedings. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9856

References

  1. Alldridge, P. (2016). Money laundering and globalization. Journal of Law and Society, 43(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12000
  2. Baker, E., & Shelley, L. I. (2017). Corruption and money laundering: Lessons from the post-Soviet transition. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9641-8
  3. Basu, S. (2014). International regulation of money laundering: A global consensus or a heterogeneous approach? Journal of Financial Crime, 21(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2013-0023
  4. Beare, M. E., & Schneider, S. (2019). Money laundering in Canada: Chasing dirty and dangerous dollars. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2017-0020.r2
  5. Bell, R. E. (2016). The seizure of criminal assets: Tackling organised crime through a proceeds of crime approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2015-0025
  6. Boles, J. R. (2014). Financial sector executives as targets for money laundering prosecutions. Journal of Financial Crime, 21(4), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2013-0022
  7. Campbell, L., & King, C. (2017). The principle of proportionality in the confiscation of proceeds of crime. Legal Studies, 37(2), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12150
  8. Cassella, S. D. (2018). The case for civil forfeiture: Why in rem proceedings are an essential tool for recovering the proceeds of crime. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 21(4), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2017-0003
  9. Chaikin, D. (2014). Politically exposed persons: Risks and mitigation. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2013-0021
  10. Chong, A., & López-de-Silanes, F. (2015). Money laundering and its regulation. Economics & Politics, 27(1), 78–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12055
  11. Ferwerda, J., & Bosma, E. (2015). The effectiveness of anti-money laundering policy: A criminological perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9247-8
  12. Gallant, M. M. (2014). Money laundering and the proceeds of crime: Economic crime and civil remedies. Journal of Financial Crime, 21(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2013-0034
  13. Geiger, H., & Wuensch, O. (2017). The fight against money laundering: An evaluation of the effectiveness of the anti-money laundering system. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 20(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2015-0036
  14. Gilmore, W. C. (2015). Dirty money: The evolution of international measures to counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-12-2014-0048
  15. Halliday, T. C., & Carruthers, B. G. (2017). The recursivity of law: Global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1135–1202. https://doi.org/10.1086/507855
  16. Harvey, J. (2014). Compliance and reporting issues arising for financial institutions from money laundering regulations: A preliminary cost benefit study. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2013-0020
  17. He, P. (2015). A typological study on money laundering. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2015-0001
  18. King, C. (2014). Civil forfeiture and article 1 of protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. Legal Studies, 34(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12025
  19. Levi, M. (2015). Money for crime and money from crime: Financing crime and laundering crime proceeds. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9241-1
  20. Lord, N. (2014). Regulating corporate bribery in international business: Anti-corruption in the UK and Germany. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9532-5