Main Article Content

Abstract

The authority of notaries in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions (UUJN). UUJN was established to ensure that notaries carry out their professional duties by providing legal protection and certainty to the public. However, the implementation of this law has not been optimal, leading to violations that contradict its provisions. In the year 2022, 67 notaries were suspected of violating the code of ethics.Through normative legal research, it was identified that notarial code of ethics violations, such as failure to read out deeds or allowing others to sign deeds in the presence of their staff, have been on the rise. Therefore, there is a need for the optimization of sanctions against notaries who breach the code of ethics, both in civil and criminal aspects, in accordance with the severity of their offenses.Supervision of notaries aims to ensure compliance with existing regulations and the code of ethics. If proven guilty of violations, notaries should face sanctions commensurate with their transgressions. The Notarial Code of Ethics encompasses five levels of sanctions, ranging from warnings to dishonorable discharge from the Notary Association membership. Notaries are obligated to adhere to UUJN, the Notarial Code of Ethics, and maintain integrity and dignity in the execution of their profession.

Keywords

Notary Code of Ethics Sanctions

Article Details

How to Cite
N Saly, J., Eka Putri, A. F., Mariana Sitorus, L., Michellena, M., Syamila, N., & Ayu Puspita, S. (2023). Legal Sanctions for Notaries Violating the Code of Ethics in Making Deeds in Indonesia. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(2), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i2.7757

References

  1. Ayuningtyasa, Pratiwi. 2020. “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris dalam Melanggar Kode Etik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 9 (2).
  2. Betty Ivana Prasetyawati, Paramita Prananingtyas. 2022. “Peran Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Membangun Integritas Notaris Di Era 4.0.” Notarius 15 (1).
  3. Bombing, I. 2015. “Pengawasan terhadap Pejabat Notaris dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik.” Lex Privatum 3 (2).
  4. Enggarwati., Irene Dwi. 2015. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris yang Diperiksa oleh Penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Keterangan Palsu Pada Akta Otentik.” Universitas Brawijaya.
  5. Iftitah, Anik, ed. 2023a. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Juli 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
  6. ———. , ed. 2023b. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mei 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka. https://repository.sadapenerbit.com/index.php/books/catalog/book/54.
  7. Jamil, M. 2018. “Sanksi Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah.” Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 7 (2).
  8. Khasanah, D. D., Iftitah, A., Abas, M., Sipayung, B., Hastarini, A., Arifuddin, Q., ... & Rohmah, A. N. 2023. Hukum Perdata. Sada Kurnia Pustaka. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=JKPpEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&ots=kYnSmukYtf&sig=Ur7SRexvNR0ozIQD67X_w4xnEsw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  9. Kurniawan, Y., & Tanawijaya, H. 2018. “Penerapan Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Pembagian Waris No 31 Menurut UUJN No 2 Tahun 2014.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 1 (1).
  10. Latifah, L. 2021. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 1 (1).
  11. Mubyarsah, Latu Ratri. 2022. “Selama 2022, 67 Notaris Diduga Langgar Kode Etik.” Jawapos.Com. 2022. https://www.jawapos.com/berita-sekitar-anda/01379045/selama-2022-67-notaris-diduga-langgar-kode-etik.
  12. Notodisoerjo, R. Soegondo. 1982. Hukum Notariat di Indonesia. Jakarta: C.V. Rajawali.
  13. Pandit, I Gede Suranaya. 2018. “Konsep Keadilan dalam Perspektif Bioetika Administrasi Publik.” Public Inspiration 2 (3).
  14. Prabawa, Bagus Gede Adi Artha. 2016. “Analisis Yuridis tentang Hak Ingkar Notaris Dalam Hal Pemeriksaan Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Dan Kode Etik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan.
  15. Rifa’i, Ahmad, and Anik Iftitah. 2018. “Bentuk-Bentuk Pelanggaran Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Supremasi 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v8i2.486.
  16. Sonata, Depri Liber. n.d. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” Fiat Justicia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 8 (1).
  17. Supomo, R. n.d. Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
  18. Tim Hukumonline. 2022. “Teori-Teori Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Para Ahli.” Hukumonline. 2022.
  19. UUJN. 2016. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas UNdang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
  20. Virgin Venlin Sarapi, Anna S. Wahongan, Presly Prayogo. 2021. “Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Lex Privatum IX (2).
  21. Wijayanto, Agus. 2017. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kriminalisasi Notaris dalam Menjalankan Tugas dan Fungsinya Sebagai Pejabat Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomer 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Akta 4 (4). https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/2620/1971.