Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 28, 2024
Accepted
Aug 30, 2024
Published
Aug 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 96 Download : 96

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, the validity of Testimonium de Auditu evidence in cases of sexual violence should provide stronger legal protection for victims, given that sexual violence often occurs in closed situations without direct witnesses. However, in reality, Testimonium de Auditu has long been considered to have insufficient evidentiary strength in Indonesian criminal law, leading to its frequent disregard in law enforcement processes. This research focuses on how regulatory changes in Indonesia have accommodated and strengthened the validity of Testimonium de Auditu in the context of sexual violence crimes. This study aims to analyze the renewal of the validity of Testimonium de Auditu evidence in sexual violence crimes based on the perspective of Indonesian legislation. The research is classified as a qualitative literature study, utilizing a normative legal approach. The findings indicate that the reforms outlined in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010, and Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) have strengthened the position of Testimonium de Auditu as valid evidence in cases of sexual violence. These reforms allow Testimonium de Auditu to be recognized and more adaptive within the criminal justice system, particularly in addressing the challenges of proving sexual violence, which often lacks direct witnesses.

Keywords

Reform Testimonium de Auditu Sexual Violence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Feni, E., Yunara, E., & Desiandri, Y. S. (2024). Pembaharuan Keabsahan Pembuktian Testimonium de Auditu dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Analisis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9201

References

  1. Agusta, M. Amry, and Nanda Sahputra Umara. “Konstruksi Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 93/Pid.B/2013/PN.TK).” Al-Qisth Law Review 6, no. 1 (October 6, 2022): 130–55. https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.6.1.130-155.
  2. Aldilla, Fiqi Amalia, S. H. Dr. Soehartono, and S. H. Heri Hartanto. “Perbandingan Asas Testimonium De Auditu Di Pengadilan Agama Dan Pengadilan Negeri Pada Perkara Perceraian Dengan Alasan Pertengkaran Terus Menerus.” Verstek 4, no. 3 (December 9, 2016): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v4i3.38768.
  3. Asmuni, Asmuni. “Testimonium De Auditu Telaah Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Fiqh.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 3, no. 2 (July 31, 2014): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.191-202.
  4. Fatimah, Siti, and Mustiqowati Ummul Fithriyyah. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (TPKS) Di Kota Pekanbaru:” JDKP; Jurnal Desentralisasi Dan Kebijakan Publik 4, no. 2 (September 1, 2023): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.30656/jdkp.v4i2.7199.
  5. Hairi, Prianter Jaya, and Marfuatul Latifah. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (Implementation of Law Number 12 of 2022 on Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 14, no. 2 (December 27, 2023): 163–80. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v14i2.4108.
  6. Idzhar, Muhammad, and Sabnah Sabnah. “Studi Perbandingan: Kedudukan Testimonium De Auditu Di Peradilan Indonesia.” Qonun: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 8, no. 1 (June 26, 2024): 35–66. https://doi.org/10.21093/qj.v8i1.8349.
  7. Iskandar, Salma Amelinda. “UU TPKS: Upaya Negara Hukum Yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya?” Souvereignty 2, no. 3 (September 30, 2023): 282–91.
  8. Isnaini, Rani Nur. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pada Anak.” Seminar Nasional - Hukum Dan Pancasila 3, no. 3 (August 23, 2024): 1–8.
  9. Kristanto, Respati Bayu, and Hervina Puspitosari. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan (Tinjauan Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN. Sby).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 6653–64. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1526.
  10. Makinara, Ihdi Karim, Jamhir Jamhir, and Sarah Fadhilah. “Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Sidang Perceraian.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 3, no. 2 (August 18, 2020): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v3i2.7699.
  11. Munir, Misbakhul, Muhammad Junaidi, Kadi Sukarna, and Zaenal Arifin. “Keabsahan Pemeriksaan Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Yang Disiarkan Langsung Melalui Media Televisi.” Journal Juridisch 1, no. 1 (April 13, 2023): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.26623/jj.v1i1.6796.
  12. Nofiardi, Nofiardi. “Testimonium de Auditu Witness: Comparison of Maṣlāhah in the Settlement of Syiqāq in the Religious Court of the Border Regions.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (June 5, 2023): 1016–36. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.11493.
  13. Putra, Muhammad Johan Aria, Firman Freaddy Busroh, and Marsudi Utoyo. “Analisa Hukum Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 65/PUU-VIII/2010 Dihubungkan Dengan Keabsahan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium de Auditu Dalam Peristiwa Pidana Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (April 11, 2023): 135–52. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i3.15.
  14. Putri, Filzah Arina, and Ahmad Mahyani. “Keterangan Testimonium De Auditu Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Hakim.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 1 (2023): 341–53. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.185.
  15. Putri, Mega, Elwi Danil, and Nani Mulyati. “Legal Standing of Testimonium De Auditu on Child Sex Crime.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 6 (January 2, 2020): 666–76. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1275.
  16. Qorthobi, Albab. “Penggunaan Testimonium de Auditu Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1566K/Pid.Sus/2014).” Brawijaya Law Student Journal 1, no. 1 (October 6, 2023): 43.
  17. Risal, M. Chaerul. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual Pasca Pengesahan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Penerapan dan Efektivitas.” Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan 11, no. 1 (June 23, 2022): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v1i2.34207.
  18. Rosyid, Muhammad Aenur, and Hoirun Nisa. “Kualitas Kesaksian Testimonium De Auditu Pada Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyyah Aceh Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Anak.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 9, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 76–91. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2023.9.1.76-91.
  19. Siadari, Hamidah, Nur Rochaeti, and Bambang Dwi Baskoro. “Arti Penting Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perkosaan.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (July 13, 2016): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12573.
  20. Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 2 (August 8, 2014): 137–55. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i2.84.
  21. Wangke, Asprianto. “Kedudukan Saksi De Auditu Dalam Praktik Peradilan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 6 (August 8, 2017): 146–56.
  22. Yulianti, Elsa Syafira Destiana & Sri Wahyuningsih. “Telaah Nilai Pembuktian Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Atas Perluasan Keterangan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu.” Verstek 9, no. 2 (May 6, 2021): 262–73. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i2.51071.