Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 6, 2024
Accepted
Sep 6, 2024
Published
Sep 7, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 184 Download : 244

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Legal protection for victims of terrorism should ensure justice and welfare for the victims, both from the perspective of Islamic criminal law and positive law. In reality, the application of law in Indonesia, particularly in the context of victim protection from terrorism, still faces challenges such as legal obstacles and limitations in victim protection mechanisms. This research aims to examine legal protection for terrorism victims from the perspectives of both Islamic criminal law and positive law. This article falls under qualitative legal research. The methodology employed is a normative juridical study with a correlational analysis between Islamic law and positive law. The findings conclude that legal protection for terrorism victims in the context of Islamic criminal law and positive law aims to protect victims' rights and ensure justice. Islamic criminal law emphasizes victim restitution through diyat (compensation) and qisas (retributive justice), while positive law in Indonesia focuses on restitution and state compensation. Despite their different approaches, both are complementary in ensuring victim protection.

Keywords

Legal Protection Terrorism Victims Islamic Criminal Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Butar Butar, M. R., & Azizah, N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme; Korelasi Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9252

References

  1. Adelina, Riski, and Zulkarnain. “Eksternalisasi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Terorisme Dalam Perspektif Pidana Islam: Studi Komparasi Indonesia Dan Mesir.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam 16, no. 2 (July 31, 2024): 288–306. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8854.
  2. Alexandra, Halomoan Freddy Sitinjak. “Pemberian Restitusi Dan Kompensasi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Nilai Keadilan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK) 4, no. 5 (October 18, 2022): 5975–84. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i5.7637.
  3. Febryani, Evy. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Sebagai Bentuk Penegakan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (June 30, 2024): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.32502/khk.v6i1.6293.
  4. Fraja, St Ika Noerwulan, Nadiya Ayu Rizky Saraswati, and Ury Ayu Masitoh. “Perbandingan Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Dan Belanda.” DIVERSI: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (April 30, 2021): 50–75. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v7i1.1117.
  5. Hendriana, Rani. “Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Antara Desiderata Dan Realita.” Kosmik Hukum 16, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v16i1.1273.
  6. Iswanto, Wahyudi. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Korban Terorisme.” Lex Crimen 4, no. 1 (2015): 3238.
  7. Komariah, Mamay. “Kajian Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Persfektif Hukum Pidana Internasional.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 5, no. 1 (June 2, 2017): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v5i1.281.
  8. Koto, Ismail. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan 2, no. 1 (November 7, 2021): 1052–59. https://doi.org/10.30596/snk.v2i1.8438.
  9. Li, Darryl. “Jihad in a World of Sovereigns: Law, Violence, and Islam in the Bosnia Crisis.” Law & Social Inquiry 41, no. 2 (2016): 371–401.
  10. Lukman, Lukman Encik, Cora Elly Noviati, Gatot Iriyanto, Frandy Risona Tarigan, and Jhon Piter Situmeang. “Kebijakan Rehabilitasi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia.” CLEAR: Criminal Law Review 1, no. 2 (December 4, 2023): 18–32.
  11. Masyhar, Ali, Rohadhatul Aisy, Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna, and Gaini Mukhanova. “Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries.” BESTUUR 12, no. 1 (July 4, 2024): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v12i1.78576.
  12. Musoffa, Azzam. “Jihad Dan Terorisme Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Maqasid Syari’ah.” Al-I’jaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, Falsafah Dan Keislaman 3, no. 1 (June 14, 2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.53563/ai.v3i1.48.
  13. Musyarri, Fazal Akmal. “Ganti Rugi Korban Terorisme Ditinjau dari Perspektif Sosio-Legal.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 1, no. 9 (2020): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i9.223.
  14. Nakissa, Aria. “Security, Islam, and Indonesia: An Anthropological Analysis of Indonesia’s National Counterterrorism Agency.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde 176, no. 2/3 (2020): 203–39.
  15. Pangesti, Hutpa Ade. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 8, no. 10 (January 7, 2020): 56–44.
  16. Pertiwi, Yuliana Anggun, Pujo Widodo, and Priyanto Priyanto. “Pengaruh Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) Terhadap Perkembangan Ancaman Terorisme Di Indonesia.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 10, no. 2 (April 3, 2023): 796–802. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i2.2023.796-802.
  17. Salim, Pebri. “Diyat Berdasarkan Gender Sebagai Pengganti Qishas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam).” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam 1, no. 4 (December 29, 2020): 416–33. https://doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v1i4.8423.
  18. Saputra, Kelik Caesar, Aldi Cahya Satria, M. Hamzah Al Ghafiki, Pramudita Mandala Sakti, Noufal Raihan Ghulam, Ripa Mahal Kabul Izati, Haykal Fahd Wijaya Muhammad, and Rofiq Maulana Sandi. “Penerapan Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Studi Kasus Bom Bali.” Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (June 22, 2024): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1352.
  19. Satria, Alif. “Two Decades of Counterterrorism in Indonesia: Successful Developments and Future Challenges.” Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses 14, no. 5 (2022): 7–16.
  20. Serbabagus, Shalahudin, Frifqi Dewangga Andreianto, Ahmad Munir, and Moh Hudi. “Enforcement of Reduced Punishment for Perpetrators of Terrorism Crimes against Death Penalty Punishment.” JHR; Jurnal Hukum Replik 12, no. 1 (April 2, 2024): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v12i1.10361.
  21. Setiawan, Gusti Nyoman Adung, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I. Made Minggu Widyantara. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 2 (June 30, 2021): 332–36. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.2.3330.332-336.
  22. Sufrizal, Sufrizal, Muhammad Alwin Abdillah, and M. Anzaikhan. “Analysis Ta’zir Punishment and Istinbath Legal Method Imam Malik’s Perspective.” Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (December 23, 2023): 126–46. https://doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i2.19367.
  23. Sunandar. “Perbandingan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Antara Hukum di Indonesia Dan Mesir Serta Relevansinya Dengan Konsepsi Hak Asasi Manusia.” Universitas Islam Negeri Wali Songo, 2022. https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/ajil.
  24. Suprapto, Suprapto. “Aksi Terorisme: Dari Gerakan Ideologis Ke Gerakan Inkostitusional.” Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi) 12, no. 2 (December 17, 2018): 143–60.
  25. Syalsabila, Adelia Nor. “Analisis Kasus Bom Bali Sebagai Problematika Hak Asasi Manusia.” Konstruksi Sosial: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial 2, no. 1 (January 28, 2022): 14–20. https://doi.org/10.56393/konstruksisosial.v1i7.1318.
  26. Umam, Muhammad Miftahul, and Ridwan Arifin. “Legal Protection for Witnesses and Victims of Crimes of Terrorism.” Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security 1, no. 2 (July 31, 2022): 109–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijctns.v1i2.60588.
  27. ———. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Saksi Dan Korban Dari Tindak Pidana Terorisme.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 3, no. 2 (July 26, 2022): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v3i2.13732.
  28. Wahyuni, Sri. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Law Reform 3, no. 2 (December 23, 2010): 82–100. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v3i2.729.
  29. Waladi, Husni. “Makna Jihad Pada Quran Surat Al-Hajj Ayat 78 Dalam Konteks Tafsir Dan Pemahaman Kontemporer.” SKULA: Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru Madrasah 3, no. 1 (August 1, 2023): 15–29.
  30. Wijaya, Irawan Adi, and Hari Purwadi. “Pemberian Restitusi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 6, no. 2 (February 1, 2018): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17728.
  31. Yulianti, Astri, Ade Mahmud, and Fariz Farrih Izadi. “Pemidanaan Bagi Pelaku Terorisme Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (December 21, 2022): 101–6. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v2i2.1456.