Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim di Indonesia: Dasar, Metode, serta Implikasinya terhadap Kepastian dan Keadilan Hukum

  • Agi Attaubah Hidayat UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ramdani Wahyu Sururi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Amalia Nur Anwari UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Lilis Diah Sugiarti UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Fachrial Ikhsan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ridwan Fauzi Al-Azhar University, Egypt
Keywords: Legal Discovery, Indonesian Judges, Court Decisions

Abstract

Ideally, legal discovery by judges is expected to create both legal certainty and substantive justice simultaneously. However, in reality, the practice of legal discovery in Indonesia often leads to legal uncertainty due to differences in interpretation and the varied use of interpretative methods. Flexibility in legal discovery also has the potential to be misused if not supported by ethical foundations and adequate competence. This study aims to analyze the legal basis, methods, and implications of legal discovery by judges in Indonesia on legal certainty and justice. This research employs a juridical-normative approach by analyzing Law No. 48 of 2009, court decisions, and legal doctrines related to methods of legal interpretation. The results show that legal discovery by judges is necessary to address legal gaps and adapt the law to social developments. However, flexibility in legal discovery must be balanced with consistency in legal application to maintain legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anis, Mursal, Fitriati Fitriati, and Bisma Putra Pratama. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Penerapan Teori Retributif Dikaitkan Dengan Rasa Keadilan Bagi Korban Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.†Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 2 (July 5, 2023): 575–84. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.347.

Anjari, Warih. “Kedudukan Asas Legalitas Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006 Dan 025/PUU-XIV/2016.†Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (April 1, 2019): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1611.

Anwar, Khoirul. “Penerapan Asas IUS Curia Novit Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Agama Di Nusa Tenggara Timur.†JPDK: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 4, no. 5 (October 5, 2022): 4010–29. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i5.7252.

Baihaki, Muhammad Reza. “Penilaian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang (Detournement De Pouvoir) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.†Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (March 25, 2023): 100–122. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2016.

Batubara, Rajali. “Peranan Interpretasi Hukum Dalam Praktik Peradilan Di Indonesia.†El-Sirry: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Sosial 2, no. 1 (June 21, 2024): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.24952/ejhis.v2i1.11384.

Hafizah, Annisa, Madiasa Ablisar, and Rafiqoh Lubis. “Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.†Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law 1, no. 1 (February 10, 2022): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i1.8311.

Harini, Mediana, and Diding Rahmat. “Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim.†Journal Evidence Of Law 4, no. 1 (February 24, 2025): 207–30. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1097.

Helmi, Muhammad. “Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim Berdasarkan Paradigma Konstruktivisme.†Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 22, no. 1 (May 4, 2020): 111–32. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i1.14792.

Idzhar, Muhammad, and Sabnah Sabnah. “Studi Perbandingan: Kedudukan Testimonium De Auditu Di Peradilan Indonesia.†Qonun: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 8, no. 1 (June 26, 2024): 35–66. https://doi.org/10.21093/qj.v8i1.8349.

Isnantiana, Nur Iftitah. “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan.†Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 18, no. 2 (2017): 41. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920.

Iswantoro, Wahyu. “Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dan Implikasi Terhadap Perkembangan Praperadilan.†Majalah Hukum Nasional 48, no. 1 (July 18, 2018): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v48i1.112.

Juddah, Nurdin. “Metode Ijtihad Hakim dalam Penyelesaian Perkara.†Jurnal Diskursus Islam 1, no. 2 (August 29, 2013): 254–64. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v1i2.6627.

Junaedi, Ahmad, and Moersidin Moeklas. “Kedudukan dan Yurisdiksi Peradilan Militer Pasca Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia.†Dekrit; Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 1 (September 28, 2022): 21–40.

Latif, Abdul. “Tafsir Hakim Terhadap Unsur Melawan Hukum Pasca Putusan MK Atas Pengujian UU PTPK.†Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2010): 049–068. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk732.

Martono. “Implementasi Nilai Keadilan Sosial oleh Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Pidana.†Legal Journal of Law 1, no. 1 (April 30, 2022): 21–38.

Mursyid, Mursyid. “Ijtihad Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Harta Bersama Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh.†Ar-Raniry: International Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (July 28, 2020): 317–46. https://doi.org/10.22373/jar.v1i2.7390.

Ningrum, Tuti. “Dinamika Interpretasi Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Penetapan Pengangakatan Anak.†Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Studi Islam 2, no. 1 (January 29, 2020): 108–22. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v2i1.42.

Pennisi, Carlo. “Legal Culture and Empirical Research: Improving the Socio-Legal Character of the Sociology of Law.†Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12, no. 6 (December 1, 2022): 1347–57. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1323.

Perangin-angin, Bahtera, Bunyamin Alamsyah, and M. Zen Abdullah. “Peranan Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Di Wilayah Pengadilan Negeri Jambi.†Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (May 12, 2017): 206–50. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v6i2.122.

Permanasari, Novia. “Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Pusat NO. 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI.†Syntax Idea 3, no. 9 (September 20, 2021): 2159–78. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v3i9.1486.

Qausar, Gibran Zulian, and Dahlan Ali. “Bantuan Hukum dalam Perkara Jinayat (Suatu Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh).†Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana 4, no. 3 (August 30, 2020): 459–71. https://jim.usk.ac.id/pidana/article/view/16752/0.

Rizki, Putri Deyesi. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menentukan Subjek Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah.†Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review 1, no. 1 (April 4, 2022): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.31933/sqeb8b44.

Soa, Alfonsus Hendri. “Pergeseran Paradigma Asas Legalitas Dalam Implementasi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.†Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) 3, no. 02 (August 13, 2023): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v3i2.3077.

Suparno, Suparno, and Abdul Jalil. “Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim di Indonesia.†Law, Development and Justice Review 5, no. 1 (June 7, 2022): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v5i1.15043.

Utari, Pingkan, and Galih Pratama Widya Saputri. “Fungsi Asas Legalitas dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman untuk Melakukan Penemuan Hukum.†Jurnal Fundamental Justice 5, no. 1 (March 31, 2024): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v5i1.3603.

Published
2025-02-27
How to Cite
Hidayat, A. A., Sururi, R. W., Anwari, A. N., Sugiarti, L. D., Ikhsan, F., & Fauzi, R. (2025). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim di Indonesia: Dasar, Metode, serta Implikasinya terhadap Kepastian dan Keadilan Hukum. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v10i1.9770