Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 198 Download : 444

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The availability of learning tools is one indicator the teacher has prepared a learning plan
properly. However, existing learning tools have not triggered students' creative thinking
abilities. This study aims to produce learning tools by using the Treffinger learning model to
improve the mathematical creative thinking ability of junior high school students. This type of
research is development research. The results of this study indicate that the learning device
meets the effective criteria. Effectiveness can be seen in the results of positive responses of
students namely 89.5% and the results of student learning tests on the indicator of fluency
reached 97.7%, flexibility reached 86.7%, and authenticity reached 23.5%, so the ability to
think creatively is at the level 3 (creative).

Keywords

Ability to think Creatively Learning tools Treffinger Learning Models

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author who publishes in the At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan ISSN: 2086-9754 (Print), 2086-9754 (Online) agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Gambar terkait

References

  1. Amtiningsih, S., Dwiastuti, S., & Sari, D. P. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan
  2. Berpikir Kreatif melalui Penerapan Guided Inquiry dipadu
  3. Brainstorming pada Materi Pencemaran Air. In Proceeding Biology
  4. Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol.
  5. 13, No. 1, pp. 868-872).
  6. Branch, R.M.(2009).Instructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. New York:
  7. Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
  8. Dwijanto. (2007).Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah berbantuan
  9. komputer terhadap pencapaian kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan
  10. berpikir kreatif matematik mahapeserta didik. (Disertasi). Universitas
  11. Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung.
  12. Hobri. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Pengembangan [Aplikasi Pada penelitian
  13. Pendidikan Matematika]. Jember : Pena Salsabila
  14. Ihksan, M. (2012). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van
  15. Hiele Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Geometri Peserta didik SMP Di
  16. Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(2),
  17. Johnson, S. (2011). Where good ideas come from: the seven patterns of
  18. innovation. Penguin UK.
  19. Mahmudi, A. (2010). Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis.
  20. Makalah Disajikan Pada Konferensi Nasional Matematika XV UNIMA
  21. Manado, 30 Juni-3 Juli 2010. Tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri
  22. Yogyakarta.
  23. Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta:
  24. Rineka Cipta.
  25. Nazarudin. 2007. Manajemen Pembelajaran : Implementasi, Konsep,
  26. Karakteristik, Metodologi Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Umum.
  27. Yogyakarta : Teras
  28. Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Dalam Plomp, T;
  29. Nieveen, N; Gustafson, K; Branch, R.M; dan van den Akker, J (eds).
  30. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London: Kluwer
  31. Academic Publisher
  32. Nurjaya. (2013). Pelatihan Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran Bermuatan
  33. Pendidikan Karakter sesuai Amanat Kurikulum 2013 pada Guru-guru
  34. Sekolah Dasar Nomor 1. Kapal. Universitas Ganesha Singaraja: Bali.
  35. Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM, 29(3),
  36. 63-67.
  37. Putri, C. A., Munzir, S., & Abidin, Z. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif
  38. Matematis Peserta didik melalui Model Pembelajaran Brain-Based
  39. Learning. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 6(1), 12-27.
  40. Robinson, J. R. (2011). Webster’s dictionary definition of creativity. Online
  41. Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 3(2), 34-47.
  42. Saputra, H. (2018, July 30). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis.
  43. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5ZNUK
  44. Siswono, T. Y. E. (2007). Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan
  45. Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Kreatif Peserta didik dalam Memecahkan dan
  46. Mengajukan Masalah Matematika. Disertasi. Tidak diterbitkan.
  47. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  48. Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013.
  49. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  50. Titin, T. (2016). Penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran pada materi ruang
  51. lingkup biologi kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA,
  52. 7(1), 45-56.
  53. Wirahayu, Y. A., Purwito, H., & Juarti, J. (2018). Penerapan Model
  54. Pembelajaran Treffinger dan Ketrampilan Berpikir Divergen
  55. Mahapeserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, dan
  56. Praktek dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi, 23(1), 30-40.
  57. Zuhdan, K., & Tim. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Sains
  58. Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Kognitif, Keterampilan Proses,
  59. Kreativitas serta Menerapkan Konsep Ilmiah Peserta Didik SMP.Yogyakarta: UNY