Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 89 Download : 124

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract


 


The aim of this research was to describe the experience of teaching activities using shift system during the pandemic and to know the obstacles students' experience in the learning activity. The method of this study was qualitative with descriptive design. Subject of the study was one teacher and 10 students of XI IPA3 of SMAN No.3 Langsa. The data were collected by using questionnaire and documentation. Based on the result of the research, the experience of teaching activity using shift system has an impact on the learning process. The teacher must arrange the schedule and students material according to the syllabus continuously for different days. It often leads the teacher to repeat the material was unintentionally. In addition, the duration of learning is only 30 minutes, which the previous was 45 minutes. Then, students also experienced obstacles during the learning. Students found difficulties in understanding the materials explained by the teacher because the duration was short. The system made them lazy to study as the learning is divided in to shift A & B. It can be concluded that the teaching activity using the shift system do not run optimally.

Keywords

Pandemic Shift System Teaching Activities

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author who publishes in the At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan ISSN: 2086-9754 (Print), 2086-9754 (Online) agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Gambar terkait

References

  1. Abadzi, H. (2010). Double‐shift schooling: design and operation for cost‐effectiveness. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2010.503368
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education 8th edition, Wardswoth Cengage Learning. Canada: Nelson Education Ltd Exotic Classic.
  3. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities. In Report to The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
  4. Bervell, B., Sam, A. C., & Boadu, K. (2013). The nature of the shift schooling system in Ghana: Implications on pedagogy. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n4p25
  5. Boadu, G. (2021). Developments in history education in Ghana. Yesterday and Today, (25). https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2021/n25a5
  6. Brahier, D. J. (2020). Teaching secondary and middle school mathematics. In Teaching Secondary and Middle School Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052934
  7. Dedeaux, T. (2012). An introduction to educational research. In Technology Integration and Foundations for Effective Leadership. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2656-0.ch019
  8. Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (1999). Belajar dan pembelajaran.
  9. Dunn, J. (1974). Book Review: Microteaching: Research, Theory and Practice, Sydney Micro Skills, Series 1 Handbook: Reinforcement, Basic Questioning, and Variability. Australian Journal of Education, 18(3), 329–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417401800319
  10. Jančič, P., & Hus, V. (2018). Teaching social studies with games. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018040106
  11. Moody, S. J. (2014). Well, I’m a Gaijin: Constructing identity through English and humor in the international workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.001
  12. Moura, R. (2014). The Impact of European Project Implemented in Primary School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.831
  13. Rebecca, O. (2017). Exploring Psychology in Language Learning and Teaching. ELT Journal, 71(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx038
  14. Richards, J. C. (2002). New Interchange 1 Lab Guide: English for International Communication. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Sardiman, S. (2015). Menakar Posisi Sejarah Indonesia pada Kurikulum 2013. ISTORIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sejarah. https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v11i2.7555
  16. Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2003.11.003