Main Article Content

Abstract

The utilization of teaching media is still very limited. Especially for teaching math concepts in madrasah ibtidaiyah. This study aims to explain the effect of using Raktepel (Rainbow Egg Rack) media on students' understanding of mathematical concepts on multiplication and division material in class II MI Nurul Islamiyah Kedaung. The research method used is a quasiexperiment with a Posttest-Only Group Design research design. The sample in this study consisted of an experimental class of 23 students and a control class of 23 students. The results showed that students who were taught using Raktepel media obtained a higher average score than the average score of the mathematical concept understanding ability of students who were taught without using Raktepel media. This can be seen from the results of the t-test of the post-test of the experimental class and the control class of 0.007 with a significance level of 0.05. So, it can be concluded that this Raktepel media has a significant effect on helping grade II students at MI Nurul Islamiyah Kedaung to understand the concepts of multiplication and division.

Keywords

Mathematical Concepts Media Raktepel Elementary School Student

Article Details

References

  1. Afriani, d., fardila, a., & septian, g. D. (2019). Penggunaan metode jarimatika
  2. dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berhitung perkalian pada siswa
  3. sekolah dasar. Journal of elementary education, 02, 5.
  4. Afrilina, f. (2017). Pengaruh penggunaan alat peraga corong berhitung
  5. terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi perkalian dan
  6. pembagian.
  7. Apriliani, i. T. (2018). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe
  8. student team’s achievement divisions dan think pair and share
  9. terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Jurnal
  10. peka : pendidikan matematika, 1(2).
  11. Arifin, f., & herman, t. (2017). The influence of e-learning model web
  12. enhanced course to conceptual understanding and self-regulated
  13. learning in mathematics for elementary school students. Tarbiya:
  14. journal of education in muslim society, 4(1), 45–52.
  15. Https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v4i1.5536
  16. Bolstad, o. H. (2023). Lower secondary students’ encounters with
  17. mathematical literacy. Mathematics education research journal, 35(1),
  18. 237–253. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7
  19. Crespo, s., & harper, f. K. (2020). Learning to pose collaborative mathematics
  20. problems with secondary prospective teachers. International journal
  21. of educational research, 102, 101430.
  22. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.003
  23. Fahrudhin, a. G., zuliana, e., & henry, s. B. (2018). Peningkatan pemahaman
  24. konsep matematika melalui realistic mathematic education berbantu
  25. alat peraga bongpas. Anargya: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan matematika,
  26. 1(1). Http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/anargya
  27. Fatqurhohman. (2016). Pemahaman konsep matematika siswa dalam
  28. menyelesaikan masalah bangun datar. Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan
  29. matematika, 4(2), 127–133.
  30. Kang, h., & cogan, l. (2022). The differential role of socioeconomic status in
  31. the relationship between curriculum-based mathematics and220
  32. mathematics literacy: the link between timss and pisa. International
  33. journal of science and mathematics education, 20(1), 133–148.
  34. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10133-2
  35. Nurjaya, Rahayu, N., & Sari, R. (2023). Deskripsi minat peserta didik dalam belajar
  36. matematika melalui permainan. Al-Azkiya : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MI/SD,
  37. 8(1). Retrieved from
  38. https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/azkiya/article/view/6511
  39. Öğretmenn, m., ruttn olmayan, a., problemlerr, m., becerrlerr, ç., bu, v. E.,
  40. düşüncelerr, k., altun, m., & sezggn memnun, d. (2008). Journal of
  41. theory and practice in education articles/ makaleler. 4(2), 213–238.
  42. Pisa. (2018). Matematika pisa 2022 kerangka (draft).
  43. Sari, R. (2017). Pengantar penelitian kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  44. Solichin, m. (2017). Analisis daya beda soal, taraf kesukaran, validitas, butir
  45. tes, interpretasi hasil tes dan validitas ramalan dalam evaluasi
  46. pendidikan. Dirasat: jurnal manajemen & pendidikan islam, 2(2), 192–
  47. 213.
  48. Suyuti, f. W., ridlo, l., & riwanto, m. A. (2018). Penggunaan media rak telur
  49. rainbow dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika materi
  50. perkalian dan pembagian kelas ii sd negeri karangasem 01. Jurnal
  51. pancar, 2(2), 37–41.
  52. Thien, l. M. (2016). Malaysian students’ performance in mathematics literacy
  53. in pisa from gender and socioeconomic status perspectives. Asiapacific education researcher, 25(4), 657–666.
  54. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0295-0
  55. Vula, e. (2011). Collaborative action research: teaching of multiplication and
  56. division in the second grade. Turkish online journal of qualitative
  57. inquiry, 2(2).
  58. Wildaniati, y., & afriana, a. (2019). Penggunaan alat peraga untuk
  59. meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas v sd n 2 Gunung Katun
  60. kecamatan Baradatu. Dewantara, VII (1), 56–72.
  61. Wilkins, J. L. M. (2015). Standards-based mathematics curricula and the
  62. promotion of quantitative literacy in elementary school. International
  63. Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-
  64. 015-0032-x