Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 112 Download : 67

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

System chandes in education influenced by industrial revolution 4.0. Several changes were made by utilizing several applications that support each learning process. One use of the Screencast-O Matic (SOM) application in lectures by combining PowerPoint with videos from students' faces so that they can improve their quality. This study aims to determine student creativity and the influence of the Screencast-O Matic (SOM) assisted project learning model on the creativity of FTIK IAIN Langsa students. This study uses associative research/causality with a quantitative approach. The population used in this study were all 6th-semester students of FTIK IAIN Langsa who took the quantitative research methodology course, totaling 293 students. The research sample was obtained by a purposive technique using the Slovin formula. Based on this formula, 75 students were obtained as a research sample with a tolerance limit of 10%. The instrument was a closed questionnaire with 15 questions and an observation sheet. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. The results showed that student creativity was 78.00 with high criteria. There was a significant influence of the use of the SOM applicationassisted project learning model on the creativity of FTIK IAIN Langsa students.

Keywords

Creativity, Online Learning, Project learning models Screencast-O-Matic, project learning models,

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author who publishes in the At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan ISSN: 2086-9754 (Print), 2086-9754 (Online) agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Gambar terkait

References

  1. Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Refika Aditama.
  2. Buaddin Hasan. (2020). Pemanfaatan google classroom dalam matakuliah menggunakan media video screencast o-matic. widya wacana: JURNAL ILMIAH, 1.
  3. Daryanto. (2009). Panduan proses pembelajaran kreatif dan inovatif. AV Publisher.
  4. Foong, W. S., & Mahmud, M. M. (2019). I can learn calculus virtually: personalizing eLearn and Screencast-O-Matic in blended learning environment. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, June, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338188.3338192
  5. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(November 2019), 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
  6. Kholifah, S. (2016). Pengembangan media video pembelajaran berbantuan software swishmax dan screencast o-matic dengan model flipped classroom pada mata kuliah manajemen strategik. JURNAL NUSANTARA APLIKASI MANAJEMEN BISNIS, 1(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v1i2.461
  7. Listiawati Enny. (2018). Penggunaan video screencast o-maticpada mata kuliah aljabar abstrak. Enny Listiawati.
  8. Listiqowati, I., Budijanto, Sumarmi, & Ruja, I. N. (2022). The impact of project-based flipped classroom (pjbfc) on critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15346a
  9. Masnipal. (2018). Menjadi guru PAUD profesional. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  10.  
  11. Sagita, D. D., Daharnis, D., & Syahniar, S. (2017). Hubungan self efficacy, motivasi berprestasi, prokrastinasi akademik dan stres akademik mahasiswa. Bikotetik (Bimbingan Dan Konseling: Teori Dan Praktik), 1(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.26740/bikotetik.v1n2.p43-52
  12. Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4593
  13. Soekartiwi. (2003). Prinsip dasar e-learning : Teori dan aplikasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan.
  14. Turrahma, A., Satyariza, E. N., & Ibrahim, A. (2018). Pemanfaatan e-learning berbasis lcms moodle dalam peningkatan efisiensi dan efektivitas serta kualitas media pembelajaran siswa di MAN Sakatiga. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (JANAPATI), 6(3), 327. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v6i3.12672
  15. Wirahyuni, K. (2019). Pemanfaatan screencast-o-matic dalam pembelajaran ICT. 49–55.
  16. Wiratna Sujarweni. (2014). Metode penelitian: Lengkap, praktis dan mudah dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press.
  17. Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(May 2019), 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
  18. Yuan, R., Yang, M., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Enhancing undergraduates’ critical thinking through research engagement: A practitioner research approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(July), 100737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100737