Main Article Content

Abstract

Ṭaha Husain has an educational background in Egypt and Paris, so it is not surprising that he sometimes adopts the methods of orientalist scepticism that he admires many while in Paris. However, he still paid attention to Egypt. As the father of literature at this time, he paid attention to popular Arabic literature, namely the poetry jahili, which he later booked, and he named Fī al-Syi'rī al-Jāhilī, which later changed its name to Fī al-Adāb al-Jāhilī. With qualitative methods and data excavation categorized as research libraries, the author tried to reveal how Taha Husain's study of Arabic literature is contained in his work Fī al-Syi'ri al-JāhilīThis research resulted in the fact that the poem jahili, according to Ṭaha, is no longer authentic. It has been infiltrated by some interests, both personal, tribal fanaticism, politics, and even religion. Even if there is still genuine poetry, then it is very little. This authenticity made Taha refuse and said that this no longer authentic poetry could not be used as a tool to understand the Qur'an. It must be the other way around because the Qur'an is the only original and most reliable Arabic literature.

Keywords

Ṭaha Husain Skepticism Syair Jāhili Fī al-Syi'ri al-Jāhilī

Article Details

How to Cite
Faruq, U., & Riyadi, A. K. (2022). ṬAHA HUSAIN’S SKEPTICISM OF JᾹHILĪ POET AND ITS POSITION IN THE QUR’AN: ANALYSIS OF ṬAHA HUSAIN’S THOUGHT IN FĪ AL-SYI’RI AL-JĀHILĪ. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 7(1), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v7i1.3838

References

  1. Annur, Barsihannor. “Pemikiran Taha Husain.” Jurnal Al-Hikmah 15, no. 1 (2014): 126–32.
  2. Al-Gharnaṭy. Abu Hayyan al-Andalusy. Al-Bahr Al-Muhīṭ Fī Al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Dar al- Fikr, 1992.
  3. Atwan. Husayn. Muqaddimah Al-Qasīdah Al-Arabiyyah Fī Sadr Al-Islam. Beiru: Dar al-Jil, 1987.
  4. Al-Qirwānī. Ibnu Raṣīq. Al-‘Umdah Fī Mahāsin Al-Syi’Ri Wa Adābihi. Beirut: Dar al-Ma`rifat, n.d.
  5. Al-Akk. Khalid Abdurrahman. Uṣul Al-Tafsīl Wa Qawāiduhu. Beirut: Dar al-Nafāis, 1986.
  6. Ali Ja’far. Musā’id Muslim Abdullah. Athar Al-Tahawur Al-Fikrī Fī Al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Muasasah al-Risālah, 1984.
  7. Anwar. Rosihon dan Asep Muharom. Ilmu Tafsir. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2015.
  8. Bustam, Betty Mauli Rosa. Dzulkifli M, Ahmad Subiyadi, Shinta Fitria Utami. Sejarah Sastra Arab Dari Berbagai Prespektif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.
  9. Choiriyah, Ngismatul. “Rasionalisme Rene Descartes.” Anterior Jurnal 13 No. 2 (n.d.): 237–43.
  10. Descartes. Rene. Diskursus Dan Metode. Translated by Ahmad Faridl Ma’ruf. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2012.
  11. Fachrudin. Aziz Anwar. Pengantar Sejarah Dan Madzhab Linguistik Arab. Sidoarjo: Lisan Arabi, 2017.
  12. Hariyanto, Ahmad. “Tafsir Era Nabi Muhammad SAW” Jurnal At-Tibyan 1, no. 1 (2016): 70-93 .
  13. Hashim, Muhammad Yusuf Ahmad. “Mura’atu Al-Nazir Fi Lughah Al-’Arabiyyah.” QIJIS : Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2013): 107–22.
  14. Hatta, J. “Thoha Husain Dan Reformasi Pendidikan Islam : Suatu Upaya Interpretasi Kontekstual Atas,” n.d., 167–80.
  15. Husain. Ṭaha. Al-Ayyām. Kairo: Hindawī, 2014.
  16. _______. Fī Al-Syi’rī Al-Jāhilī, Komentar Syaikh Samah Kurayyim. Mesir: Dar al-Mishriyah al-Bananiyah, n.d.
  17. _______. Fī Al-Adāb Al-Jāhilī. Kairo: Percetakan Fārūq, n.d.
  18. John J. Donohue and John L. Esposito. Islam and Transition ; Muslim Perspectives Diterjemahkan Oleh Machnun Husain Dengan Judul Islam Dan Pembaharuan. Translated by Machnun Husain. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1994.
  19. Khobir, Mohammad Azza Nasrul. “Dilema Penggunaan Syi’ir Jahiliyyah Dalam Tafsir ‘Kajian Atas Pemikiran Thaha Husein.’” Al-Munir: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 2, no. 2 (2020): 55–92. https://doi.org/10.24239/al-munir.v2i02.64.
  20. Kholid, Abd, Abu Bakar, Muktafi, and Mukhammad Zamzami. “Rereading the Indonesian Interpretation of the Qur’an on Awliya’: The Cases of Hamka and m. Quraish Shihab.” Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 1 (2021): 37–72. https://doi.org/10.21043/QIJIS.V9I1.7567.
  21. Mohamed, Ahmad Kamel, and Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff. “Penggunaan Syair Dalam Penghujahan Pentafsiran Al-Quran: Kajian Terhadap Kitab Al-Lubab Fi Ulum Al-Kitab Karangan Ibnu Adel Al-Hambali.” Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah 13, no. 14 (2017): 44–61. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v13i14.97.
  22. Majid. Nurkholis. Islam Kemoderenan Dan Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Mizan, 1994.
  23. Sahidah. Ahmad. God, Man and Nature. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2018.
  24. Shihab. Quraish. Membaca Sirah Nabi Muhammad Dalam Sorotan Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis-Hadis Shahih. Tanggerang: Lentera Hati, 2011.
  25. ______. Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan, 2007.
  26. Said, Imam Ghozali. "Saluting the Prophet: Cultural and Artistic Expression in Javanese Society." Journal of Indonesian Islam 12, no. 1 (2018): 103–34. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2018.12.1.103-134.
  27. Sholihah, Inayatus. “Peran Sya’ir-Sya’ir Jahili Dalam Menafsirkan Al-Qur’an (Telaah Kitab Al-Tathawwur Al-Dalali Baina Lugah Al-Syi’ri Al-Jahili Wa Lugah Al-Qur’an Al-Karim ).” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 2013.
  28. Sugiono. Sugeng. Ṭaha Husain Pandangan Dan Teorinya Tentang Puisi Jahiliyyah. Yogyakarta: Perpustakaan UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2008.
  29. Teuw. A.A. Bahasa Indonesia : Antara Kelisanan Dan Keberaksaraan. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya, 1994.
  30. Wijaya, Aksin. “Menggugat Otentisitas Syi'ir Jahiliyah.” ‘ANIL ISLAM ; Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Ilmu Keislaman 3 (2010).
  31. _______ “Kritik Nalar Tafsir Syi’ri.” Millah 10, no. 1 (2010): 1-24.
  32. Wargadinata, Wildana dan Laili Fitriani. Sastra Arab Dan Listas Budaya. Malang: UIN Malang Press, 2008.
  33. Yatim. Badri. Sejarah Peradaban Islam. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  34. Yunus, Moch. “Sastra (Puisi) Sebagai Kebudayaan Bangsa Arab.” Humanistika : Jurnal Keislaman 1, no. 1 (2015): 35-52.
  35. Yusof, Sofyuddin, Mohd Faiz Hakimi Mat Idris, and Nik Murshidah Nik Din. “Kedudukan Syair Dalam Islam.” Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 2 (2009): 21-40.