Main Article Content
Abstract
Language performance is the output of an individual's language learning. In specific, speaking may serve as an indicator of students' language skills. Second graders at a private secondary school, Maqamam Mahmuda, Takengon, Indonesia, had poor proficiency in this skill, particularly in English, with a median score of 34. The inefficient teaching and learning methods were to blame for this low achievement. As a result, it was proposed that a focused approach to the learning process be used. This study aims to determine whether integrating the inquiry and learning community may improve students' English-speaking skills. It is expected to encourage students' engagement in a learning group, predominantly speaking. In detail, the study focuses on how appropriately students perform in simple dialogue and monologues, and personal recounts following social function, general structure, and appropriate and contextual language elements. An experimental strategy using a one-group pretest and post-test design was employed to accomplish the study's objective. Twenty pupils were randomly chosen as the treatment sample from a total population of 58 students. The outcome demonstrates that the students' comprehension and pronunciation of English were significantly enhanced, from 34 to 60. The finding promotes the approach as a positive way to enhance students' interest, comprehension, and confidence to speak in classroom interactions.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Alberta Learning. (2004). Focus On Inquiry: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Inquiry-Based Learning.
- Bailey, K. M. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. McGraw-Hill.
- Brown, G., Yule, G., & McKelvie, N. (1986). Teaching the Spoken Language. RELC Journal, 17(1), 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828601700108
- Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2015). The Teaching of EFL Listening in the Indonesian Context: the State of the Art. TEFLIN Journal, 20(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i2/194-211
- Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218329
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
- Daar, G. F. (2020). Classroom Interaction In English Speaking Class (A Study At Sma Santu Fransiskus Ruteng, Flores). Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.437
- Harmer, J. (2022). The Practice of English Language Teaching (12th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
- Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., Pankake, A. M., & Olivier, D. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9060-8
- Ivone, F. M. (2005). Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia: The Urge to Improve Classroom Vocabulary Instruction. TEFLIN Journal, 16(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v16i2/195-208
- Kamarullah, K., Muslem, A., & Manan, A. (2018). Applying English Video Learning Materials in Teaching Listening. English Education Journal, 9(4), 527–540. http://journal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/12512/9667
- Kamarullah, K., Yusuf, Q., & Meutia, C. I. (2016). The Use of Quipper School with Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) for Teaching ESL Writing. First Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium between Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris and Universitas Syiah Kuala, 100, 166–178. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEIC/article/view/15835/11663
- Kurniasy, D., & Susan, R. (2019). Students’ English Speaking Anxiety Based on Personality Traits for Islamic Boarding School. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 5(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v5i1.876
- Manan, A., Fadhilah, M. A., Kamarullah, K., & Habiburrahim, H. (2020). Evaluating paper-based TOEFL preparation program using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16467
- McKay, P. (2005). Assessing Young Language Learners. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733093
- Mutiah, S. D., Nakhriyah, M., HR, N. H., Hidayat, D. N., & Hamid, F. (2020). The Readiness of Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1370–1387. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.541
- Nufus, T. Z. (2019). Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (Pros and Cons). English Language in Focus (ELIF), 1(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.1.1.65-70
- Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Heinle ELT.
- Paul, D. (2003). Teaching English to Children in Asia. Pearson.
- Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 737. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586992
- Richards, J. C. (2003). Current Trends in Teaching Listening and Speaking. The Language Teacher, 27(7), 3–6.
- Richards, J. C. (2005). Second Thoughts on Teaching Listening. RELC Journal, 36(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205053484
- Sarinauli, B. (2015). Combining Inquiry, Learning Community and Total Physical Response for Teaching English. English Education Journal, 6(3), 356–369.
- Schreiber, J., & Asner-Self, K. (2011). Educational Research: The Interrelationship of Questions, Sampling, Design, and Analysis. Wiley.
- Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., & Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001
- Wilson, J., Jan, L. W., & Curriculum Corporation (Australia). (2009). Focus on Inquiry: A Practical Approach to Curriculum Planning. Curriculum Corporation.
- Wu, W.-C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an Online Learning Community in a Flipped Classroom to Enhance EFL Learners’ Oral Proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170