TRADITION AND MODERNITY: ORTHODOX INTERPRETATION OF QS. AL-FATIHAH IN THE STUDY QURAN

person

Zikri Riza

a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:43:"Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang";}

person

Kusmana

UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

person

Mhd. Idris

Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

DOI: 10.32505/at-tibyan.v10i2.10958 inbox Received: 2025-02-17 check_circle Published: December 31, 2025 pp. 182-208

article Abstract

Implying the identical meaning, the term orthodox Islam or traditional Islam is understood as the correct doctrine in accordance with official teachings. Both are symbols of the maintenance of old religious ways that originate from an authoritative entity that must be obeyed. Assuming to impose the same way, The Study Quran by Seyyed Hossein Nasr and his team also maintain the tradition of interpreting the Quran with unique characteristics of orthodoxy. The present work aims to explicate the orthodoxy of the tradition-based interpretation contained in the work of these traditionalist scholars by focusing on QS. al-Fatihah/1’s commentary in its seven verses. The modern orthodoxy approaches remain relevant to the first surah since its everyday performance articulates the traditionalism of religious practice. We conclude that the authorship of The Study Quran is an effort to preserve traditional methods of modern Quranic interpretation as reflected through the scriptural and community elements of Islamic orthodoxy. The Study Quran's orthodoxy is characterized by the interpretation based on discursive tradition which allows the development of existing discourse and thought. It contributes to the idea that modernity does not necessarily mean quitting old conducts inherited by the treasure of traditional ‘ulum al-Qur’an. Moreover, modern interpretation orthodoxy does not withdraw from the dynamics of thoughts in diversified religious groups of Islam.

Keywords

Tradition modernity orthodoxy QS. al-Fatihah/1 The Study Quran
picture_as_pdf

Full Text Manuscript

PDF (Eng)

download Download PDF (Eng)

Authors

person

Zikri Riza

a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:43:"Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang";}

person

Kusmana

UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

person

Mhd. Idris

Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

format_list_numbered References

  1. 1. Al-Ayyubi, Mohammad Salahuddin. “Representation of Religious Literacy in Tafsir The Study Quran.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2024. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/65279/
  2. 2. .
  3. 3. Al-Qattan, Manna’. Mabahith fi Ulum al-Quran. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, n.d.
  4. 4. Al-Sabuni, Muhammad Ali. Al-Tibyan fi Ulum al-Quran. Karachi: Maktabah al-Bushra, 2011.
  5. 5. Anjum, Ovamir. “Islam as a Discursive Tradition: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors.” Comparative Study of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East 27, no. 3 (2007): 656–72. https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-2007-041
  6. 6. .
  7. 7. Al-Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran. Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim. Kairo: Al-Hayah al-Misriyyah al-Ammah li al-Kitab, 1974.
  8. 8. Brown, Jonathan. “Scripture in the Modern Muslim World: The Quran and Hadith.” In Islam in the Modern World, edited by Jeffrey T. Kenney and Ebrahim Moosa, 31–32. London–New York: Routledge, 2014.
  9. 9. Calder, Norman. “The Limits of Islamic Orthodoxy.” In Defining Islam: A Reader, edited by Andrew Rippin, 222–36. Oxfordshire–New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
  10. 10. Campanini, Massimo. The Quran: The Basic. Edited by Oliver Leaman. 2nd ed. London–New York: Routledge, 2016.
  11. 11. Cholidi, Muhammad Fiqih. “Kosmologi dalam Al-Quran: Formulasi Konsep Etika Saintis (Analisis The Study Quran).” Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, 2024. https://repository.ptiq.ac.id/id/eprint/1495/
  12. 12. .
  13. 13. Dagli, Caner K. Ibn al-Arabi and the Islamic Intellectual Tradition: From Mysticism to Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2016.
  14. 14. ———. The Ringtones of Wisdom. Chicago: Kazi Publication/ABC International Group, 2004.
  15. 15. Esack, Farid. The Quran: A User’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2005.
  16. 16. Gilliot, Claude. “Traditional Disciplines of Quranic Studies.” In Encyclopaedia of the Quran, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, vol. 5, 318–39. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
  17. 17. Graham, William A. “Traditionalism in Islam: An Essay in Interpretation.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 23, no. 3 (1993): 495–522.
  18. 18. Ismail, Muhammad. “Penafsiran Tradisionalis Sufistik terhadap Al-Quran: Studi Kritis Penafsiran Seyyed Hossein Nasr terhadap Ayat-Ayat Khawf.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2021. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/65839
  19. 19. .
  20. 20. Kalin, Ibrahim. Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Science, and Technology in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  21. 21. Khumaerah, Luluk. “Hermeneutika Tradisional Seyyed Hossein Nasr dalam The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary.” UIN Salatiga, 2019. http://e-repository.perpus.iainsalatiga.ac.id/id/eprint/6500
  22. 22. .
  23. 23. Langer, Robert, and Udo Simon. “The Dynamics of Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: Dealing with Divergence in Muslim Discourses and Islamic Studies.” Die Welt des Islams 48, no. 3/4 (2008): 273–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006008X364758
  24. 24. .
  25. 25. Lumbard, Joseph E. B. Ahmad al-Ghazali, Remembrance, and the Metaphysics of Love. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016.
  26. 26. ———. “From Hubb to Ishq: The Development of Love in Early Sufism.” Journal of Islamic Studies, no. 3 (2007): 345–85.
  27. 27. ———. Submission, Faith, and Beauty: The Religion of Islam. California–Kentucky: Zaytuna Institute–Fons Vitae, 2009.
  28. 28. ———. The Uncommonality of “A Common Word.” Brandeis University: Crown Center for Middle East Study, 2009.
  29. 29. Martin, Richard C., and Abbas Barzegar. “Formations of Orthodoxy: Authority, Power, and Networks in Muslim Societies.” In Rethinking Islamic Studies: From Orientalism to Cosmopolitanism, edited by Carl W. Ernst and Richard C. Martin, 179–202. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 2010.
  30. 30. McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. “Exegetical Sciences.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Quran, edited by Andrew Rippin, 403–19. Massachusetts–Oxford–Victoria: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006.
  31. 31. ———. “The Genre Boundaries of Quranic Commentary.” In With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Barry D. Walfish, and Joseph W. Goering, 445–61. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  32. 32. Muchlisin, Anna Rolli. “Kesarjanaan Tradisionalis Alquran di Era Kontemporer: Telaah terhadap The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary karya Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Tim.” Episteme 12, no. 2 (2017): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310
  33. 33. .
  34. 34. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, Caner K. Dagli, Maris Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary. New York: HarperOne, 2015.
  35. 35. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, and Ramin Jahanbegloo. In Search of the Sacred: A Conversation with Seyyed Hossein Nasr on His Life and Thought. California: ABC-CLIO, 2010.
  36. 36. Nauval, Muhammad Hubbab. “Neo-Tradisionalisme Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Implikasinya terhadap Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Ethico-Legal.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/45317/
  37. 37. .
  38. 38. Pocock, J. G. A. “Within the Margins: The Definitions of Orthodoxy.” In The Margin of Orthodoxy: Heterodox Writing and Cultural Response, 1660–1750, edited by Roger D. Lund, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  39. 39. Redjeki, Sri. “Konsep Estetika Tauhid pada Arsitektur Islam.” Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, 2022. https://repository.ptiq.ac.id/id/eprint/633/
  40. 40. .
  41. 41. Riza, Zikri, and Zainuddin. “Esoteric Interpretation of the Quran in The Study Quran.” Al-Bayan: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies 21, no. 2 (2023): 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-20230134
  42. 42. .
  43. 43. Rustom, Mohammed. “Ibn Arabi’s Letter to Fakhr al-Din al-Razi.” Journal of Islamic Studies, no. 2 (2014): 113–37.
  44. 44. ———. “The Metaphysics of the Heart in the Sufi Doctrine of Rumi.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, no. 1 (2008): 3–14.
  45. 45. ———. The Triumph of Mercy: Philosophy and Scripture in Mulla Sadra. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012.
  46. 46. Saeed, Abdullah. The Quran: An Introduction. London–New York: Routledge, 2008.
  47. 47. Sedgwick, Mark. “The Modernity of Neo-Traditionalist Islam.” In Muslim Subjectivities in Global Modernity, edited by Dietrich Jung and Kirstine Sinclair, 121–146. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2020.
  48. 48. Williams, Jacob. “Islamic Traditionalists: ‘Against the Modern World’?” The Muslim World 113, no. 3 (2023): 333–54.
  49. 49. Wilson, M. Brett. “The Failure of Nomenclature: The Concept of ‘Orthodoxy’ in the Study of Islam.” Comparative Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2009): 169–94.
  50. 50. Zaenuri, Ahmad. “Classical and Modern Exegesis Styles.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir 8, no. 1 (2023): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007
  51. 51. .
  52. 52. Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 162

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.