Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 16, 2022
Accepted
Nov 13, 2022
Published
Nov 18, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 676 Download : 700

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The mbecek tradition was born from the womb of solidarity of the people of Kalipait Village as a complete emotional bond. It has been a tradition for generations. The exciting thing about this research is that the mbecek tradition is an ancestral heritage that until now has remained sustainable due to cultural and social factors. As times have changed, the tradition of mbecek used to be based on the principle of helping but now experiencing a shift in business mixed with business is felt to be burdensome. Allows for the occurrence of family economic resistance. This research was conducted to determine the meaning of reciprocity of the mbecek tradition of Javanese rural women. This research uses a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach—data collection through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data analysis using an interactive model begins by continuously examining all data from primary and secondary sources until the data is saturated. The results showed that mbecek is a vehicle for exchange in the form of money and staples as a form of investment to maintain kinship ties.

Keywords

Mbecek Reciprocity Women Weddings

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Setiawan, E. (2022). MAKNA RESIPROSITAS TRADISI MBECEK PADA PEREMPUAN PEDESAAN JAWA DALAM ACARA PERNIKAHAN DI BANYUANGI JAWA TIMUR, INDONESIA. Jurnal Anifa: Studi Gender Dan Anak, 3(2), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.32505/anifa.v3i2.4780

References

  1. Ali, Sayuti. (2012). Metode Penelitian Agama: Pendekatan Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  2. Al Jabir, Muhammad Abed. (2010). Post Tradisionalisme Islam. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
  3. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta Rineksa Cipta.
  4. Bungin, Burhan. (2011). Metologi Penelitian Sosial; Format-format Kantitatif dan Kualitatif. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
  5. Bungin, Burhan. (2019). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
  6. Cristian, Gandayani. (2014). Kuasa Wanita Jawa. Yogyakarta : LKiS.
  7. Bratawidjaja, Thomas Wijaya. (2016). Upacara Tradisional Masyarakat Jawa. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  8. Damsar. (2019). Pengantar Sosiologi Ekonomi. Jakarta : Kencana.
  9. Hadi, Sutrisno. (2015). Metode Resarch II. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
  10. Hanik, U. (2022). Makna Tradisi Mbecek Dalam Perkembangan Budaya Masyarakat Karanggayam. Asketik: Jurnal Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 6(1), 137–152.
  11. Horton. (2009). Sosiologi Edisi Keenam Jilid 1. Jakarta : Erlangga.
  12. Idrus, Muhammad. (2019). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
  13. Koentjaraningrat. (2012). Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  14. Maharto. (2018). Kedudukan Wanita dalam Kebudayaan Jawa Dulu, Kini dan Esok. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Cidesindo.
  15. Marzali, Amri. (2015). Antropologi dan Pembangunan Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  16. Mauss, M. (2012). Pemberian Bentuk dan Fungsi Pertukaran di Masyarakat Kuno. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  17. Moloeng, Lexy J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
  18. Mulhern, Francis. (2010). Budaya atau Metabudaya. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  19. Muslich, A. (2020). Mbecek Culture in Religious and Social Perspectives in Ponorogo Regency, East Java. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 116-125.
  20. Nasikun. (2015). Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Jakarta: CV Rajawali.
  21. Prasetyo, Yanu Endar. (2010). Mengenal Tradisi Bangsa. Yogyakarta: IMU.
  22. Poloma, Margaret. (2014). Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grasindo Persada.
  23. Ricklefs, M.C. (2008). Sejarah Indonesia Modern 1200-2008. Jakarta: PT Serambi Ilmu Semesta.
  24. Rizqiyah, Halimatus, Warsono, Jacky, M. and Nasution. The Phenomenon of bubu tradition in the cycle of time: Portrait of reciprocity in rural Madura. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 34 (4), 481-490
  25. Setiawan, E. (2022). Potret Resiprositas Tradisi Nyumbang pada Perempuan Perdesaan di Desa Kalipait Banyuwangi. Equalita, 4(1), 1–12.
  26. Scott, James C. (2006). Moral Ekonomi Petani Pergerakan dan Subsistensi di Asia Tenggara. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  27. Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2021). Life Span Human Development. Cengage Learning.
  28. Sjafri, Sairin. (2012). Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Indonesia Perspektif Antropologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  29. Suyanto, E. (2017). Etika Moral Perempuan Desa Dalam Tradisi Nyumbang Di Tengah Monetisasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Paper “Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan Dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan VII,” 141–159.
  30. Sztompka, P. (2014). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  31. Zuriah, Nurul. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.