Table of content

 Policy Statement
 Content Integrity and Maintenance
 Retraction
 Article Withdrawal
 Article Correction
 Article Removal
 Article Replacement

 Policy Statement

We understand that the authors have worked carefully in preparing manuscripts, and we have carried out peer-review processes. However, sometimes there is the potential for published articles to be withdrawn or even deleted for scientific reasons. It should not be done lightly and can only occur under extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies, when needed, will be carried out with strict standards to maintain confidence in the authority of its electronic archives. Our commitment and policy are to maintain the integrity and completeness of critical scientific records for researchers’ and librarians’ archives.

Back to Table of Content

 Content Integrity and Maintenance

Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur. CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the document’s current status and may provide additional publication record information about the document.

Back to Table of Content

 Article Retraction

INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research is committed to playing its part in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record; therefore, on occasion, it is necessary to retract articles. Articles may be retracted if:
  • There is a significant scientific error that would invalidate the article’s conclusions, for example, where there is clear evidence that findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error).
  • The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e., cases of redundant publication).
  • There are ethical issues such as plagiarism (appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit, including those obtained through confidential review of others’ manuscripts) or inappropriate authorship.
In order to ensure that retractions are handled according to publication best practice and in accordance with COPE retraction guidelines, INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research adopts the following retraction process:
  • An article requiring potential retraction is brought to the journal editor’s attention.
  • The journal editor should follow the step-by-step guidelines according to the COPE flowcharts (including evaluating a response from the article’s author in question).
  • Before any action is taken, the editor’s findings should be sent to the Ethics Advisory Board. The purpose of this step is to ensure a consistent approach in accordance with industry best practices.
  • The final decision on whether to retract is then communicated to the author and, if necessary, any other relevant bodies, such as the author’s institution, on occasion.
  • The retraction statement is then posted online and published in the next available issue of the journal (see below for more details on this step). 
Note that if authors retain the copyright for an article, this does not mean they automatically have the right to retract it after publication. The integrity of the published scientific record is paramount, and COPE’s Retraction Guidelines still apply in such cases.

Back to Table of Content

 Article Withdrawal

The author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the publisher. For attention, before the author submits the manuscript through our OJS, the author must approve the checklist we provide.
  • If the author requests the withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished by paying IDR 500,000.00 or USD 35 per manuscript.
  • If the withdrawal after the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author will be punished with IDR 750.000,00 or USD 50 per manuscript.
  • If the article has been published as an “Article in Press” (articles that have been accepted for publication but which have not been formally published and do not have the complete volume/issue/page information) that include errors or are discovered to be accidental duplicates of other published article or are determined to violate our journal publishing ethics guidelines in the view of the editors (such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like), the article may be “Withdrawn “From the INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research website. Withdrawing means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is deleted and replaced with an HTML page and the PDF simply states that the article has been withdrawn. In this case, the author will be punished by paying IDR 750.000,00 or USD 50 per manuscript.
  • If the authors do not agree to pay the penalty, they will be blocklisted for publication in this journal for 3 years.
  • If the author request to withdraw a manuscript, an official letter signed by the corresponding author and agency leader must be sent to the Editor-in-Chief.

Back to Table of Content

 Article Correction

INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research should consider issuing a correction if:
  • A small part of an otherwise reliable publication reports flawed data or proves misleading, mainly if this results from honest error.
  • The Author or Contributor list is incorrect (e.g., a deserving Author has been omitted, or someone who does not meet authorship criteria has been included).
Corrections to peer-reviewed content fall into one of three categories:
  • Publisher correction (erratum): to notify readers of a significant error made by publishing/journal staff (usually a production error) that harms the publication record or the scientific integrity of the article or the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Author correction (corrigendum): to notify readers of a significant error made by the Authors which harms the publication record, the scientific integrity of the article, or the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Addendum: an addition to the article by its Authors to explain inconsistencies, expand the existing work, or otherwise explain or update the information in the main work.
The decision on whether a correction should be issued is made by a journal’s editor (s), sometimes with advice from Reviewers or Editorial Board members. The handling Editors will contact the authors concerned with a request for clarification, but the final decision about whether a correction is required and, if so, which type rests with the editors.

Back to Table of Content

 Article Removal

Removing a published article from our online platform may be necessary in a few cases. This will only happen if an article is clearly defamatory or infringes others’ legal rights, or where the article is, or we have good reason to expect that it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article if acted upon, may pose a severe health risk. In such circumstances, while the article’s metadata (i.e., title and author information) will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating that the article has been removed for legal reasons.

Back to Table of Content

 Article Replacement

In cases where an article, if acted upon, may pose a severe health risk, the original paper’s authors may wish to retract the flawed original and replace it with a corrected version. Under such circumstances, the above procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the article retraction notice will contain a link to the corrected re-published article together with a history of the document.

Back to Table of Content