Main Article Content

Abstract

Phonological processes are at the heart of linguistic borrowing as it has varied phonological systems. It could be seen that the loan words entering the loan language from the source language can hardly be separated from the phonological process because they must be modified to suit the phonology of the loan language. This article analysed the phonological processes realized in Ekegusii borrowing from English using Optimality Theory’s constraint approach. Since this was a phonological study, descriptive linguistic fieldwork was used. The data used in this article was extracted from Mose’s doctoral study, whereby purposive sampling was used to obtain two hundred borrowed segments from the Ekegusii dictionary, then supplemented by introspection. Further, three adult native proficient Ekegusii speakers who were neither too young nor too old and had all their teeth were purposively sampled.  The two hundred tokens were then subjected to the sampled speakers through interviews to realize the sound patterns in the Ekegusii borrowing process overtly. The findings revealed that Ekegusii phonological constraints defined the well-formedness of the loanwords by repairing the illicit structures. To fix, various phonological processes were realized. They included: epenthesis, deletion, devoicing/strengthening, voicing/ weakening, re-syllabification, substitution, monophthongization, and lenition. The article concludes that borrowing across languages (related or unrelated) reports similar if not the same phonological processes only that the processes attested in one language are a subset of the universally exhibited phonological processes.

Keywords

Constraints Epenthesis Optimality Phonological Processes Phonotactics

Article Details

How to Cite
Mose, E. (2021). Phonological Processes in Ekegusii Borrowing: A Constraint-based Approach. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 7(2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3233

References

  1. Bowern, C. (2008). Linguistic fieldwork: A practical course. Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Clark, J. (John E., Yallop, C., & Fletcher, J. (2007). An introduction to phonetics and phonology.
  3. Farazandeh-pour, F., Kord, A., & Kambuziya, Z. (2013). German Loanwords Adaptation in Persian : Optimality Approach. 20.
  4. Fossi, A., & Ouafo Lambo, A. (2012). Cultural and Linguistic Hybridizations in Cameroon: English Loanwords in ngə̂mbà. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i1.1148
  5. Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2005). Understanding phonology. Hodder Education.
  6. Guthrie, M. (1971). Comparative Bantu: An Introduction to the Comparative Linguistics and Prehistory of the Bantu Languages, Volumes 1-4. Gregg.
  7. Iribemwangi, P. I., & Karũrũ, D. W. (2012). Phonological Adaptation of Kiswahili Loanwords into Gĩ-Gĩchũgũ Dialect of Gĩkũyũ Language. 49–62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324603764_Phonological_Adaptation_of_Kiswahili_Loanwords_into_Gi-Gichugu_Dialect_of_Gikuyu_Language
  8. Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Kioko, A. N., & Muthwii, M. J. (2001). The demands of a changing society: English in education in kenya today. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310108666622
  10. Mose, E. G. (2020). A morphophonological analysis of borrowed segments in Ekegusii language: An Optimality Perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  11. Mwita, L. C. (2009). The Adaptation of Swahili Loanwords from Arabic: A Constraint-Based Analysis. Journal of Pan African Studies, 2(8), 46.
  12. Nandelenga, H. S. (2013). Constraint Interaction in the Syllabic Phonology of Lubukusu: an Optimality Theory Account. Kenyatta University.
  13. Ogechi, N. O., & Kembo-Sure. (2006). Language planning for development in Africa. Moi University Press.
  14. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756171.ch1
  15. Sri Ayuni Restifiza, R. N. R. (2012). PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES OF INDONESIAN BORROWING WORDS USED BY MINANGKABAUNESE IN BUKITTINGGI, WEST SUMATERA. English Language and Literature, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/ELL.V1I1.1835
  16. Tsvetkov, Y., & Dyer, C. (2016). Cross-Lingual Bridges with Models of Lexical Borrowing. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 55, 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4786
  17. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
  18. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Maiden: Blackwell Publishing.
  19. Sarkar, T. (2012). Loanword adaptation in Bangla: An optimality theoretic account. MA thesis, The English and Foreign Languages University. Hyderabad, India.
  20. Saleh, A. J., & Jarrah, R. S. (2013). English loanwords spoken by Madinah Arabic speakers. Arab World English Journal, 4(2), 67-85. https://awej.org/images/AllIssues/Specialissues/Translation2/5.pdf
  21. National Council for Law Reporting (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Published with the Authority of the Attorney General.
  22. Zafaranlu, K. A., & Hashemi, S. E. (2011). Russian loanwords adaptations in Persian; Optimal approach. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 1-17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED525228.pdf