Main Article Content


Chomsky states that language is a mirror of the mind. From that opinion, he creates a concept which is known as competence and performance. Competence is the fluent native speaker’s knowledge of his language; meanwhile, performance is what people actually say or understand by what someone else says on a given situation. Chomsky adds that there are two structures involved in constructing a sentence namely, Deep Structure and Surface Structure. A sentence always derives from Deep Structure which exists in the mind of speakers. Then, syntactic rules will be applied to the Deep Structure. After applying the rules, Surface Structure will be obtained. The syntactic rules applied in a sentence are Movement Transformation, Deletion Transformation, and Substitution Transformation. However, the main discussion in this article is Movement Transformation. This article will elaborate some types of movement transformation in constructing English sentences.


Movement Transformation Deep Structure Surface Structure

Article Details

How to Cite
Adha, R. (2018). MOVEMENT TRANSFORMATIONS IN ENGLISH SENTENCE CONSTRUCTION. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 3(1), 51-81.


  1. Abedi, F., Moinzadeh, A., & Gharaei, Z. (2012). Wh-movement in english and persian within the framework of government and binding theory. in International Journal of Linguistics,4(3). Retrieved from
  3. Akmajian, A., & Heny, F. (1975). An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
  4. Arifin, E. Z., & Tasai, S. A. (2000). Cermat berbahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
  5. Bach, E. (1964). An introduction to transformational grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Ltd.
  6. Brown, E. K., & Miller, J. E. (1982). Syntax: Generative grammar. London: Hutchin Son & Co. Ltd.
  7. Chaer, A. (2006). Tata bahasa praktis bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  8. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
  9. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachussetts: M.I.T. Press.
  10. Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-Movement. In P. Culicover, Formal Syntax (pp. 73-132). New York: Academic Press.
  11. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government & binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  12. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
  13. Culicover, P. W. (1997). Principles and parameters: An introduction to syntactic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Fowler, R. (1971). An introduction to transformational syntax. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
  15. Grinder, J. T., & Elgin, S. H. (1973). Guide to transformational grammar: History, theory and practice. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston Ltd.
  16. Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government & binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  17. Harman, G. H. (1963). Generative grammars without transfromational rules: A defense of phrase structure. Language,39(4), 597-616. New York: Linguistic Society of America.
  18. Harrocks, G. (1987). Generative grammar. New York: Longman.
  19. Jacobsen, B. (1977). Transformational generative grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
  20. Johnson, K. (2004). Introduction to transformational grammar. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts.
  21. Lester, M. (1971). Introductory transformational grammar of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
  22. Ouhalla, J. (1999). Introducing transformational grammar (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  23. Radford, A. (1981). Transformational syntax. London: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar: A first course. London: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Radford, A. (2009). Analysing english sentences: A minimalist approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Saragih, A. (2003). Finit ada dalam bahasa Melayu pantai timur Sumatera Utara. Julisa,3(1). Medan: Faculty of Literature UISU Medan.
  28. Suhadi, J. (2004). The adequacy of empty category in the theory of syntax. Julisa, 4(2). Medan: Faculty of Literature UISU Medan.
  29. Wang, Q. (2010). Drawing tree diagrams: Problems and suggestions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,1(6), 926-934. Finland: Academy Publisher.