Section Articles

Evidence of Authentic Deeds in Civil Disputes Related to Nominee Agreements on Ownership of Land Title Certificates

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10550
Yoga Trayama
yoga.217231031@stu.untar.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ade Adhari
Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 27, 2024
Accepted
Jan 1, 2025
Published
Jan 2, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 302 Download : 202

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, in civil disputes related to nominee agreements regarding ownership of property certificates, the authentic deed can serve as a strong tool to ensure the validity of legal transactions. However, in reality, the implementation of authentic deeds is often hindered by doubts regarding their validity and compliance with applicable legal regulations, especially when involving foreign nationals (WNA) in land transactions. The aim of this research is to analyze the evidentiary power of authentic deeds in civil disputes involving nominee agreements on property ownership certificates and assess their effectiveness in the legal process. This article falls under normative juridical legal research with a statutory approach and case approach. The methodology used involves library research and qualitative analysis of regulations and relevant court decisions. The research concludes that authentic deeds have valid evidentiary power if they meet the formal, material, and external requirements, but can be canceled if they do not fulfill these conditions, and the notary who issues them may face sanctions. Notaries are responsible for ensuring the validity of the deeds they create, and if they cause harm to other parties, they can be held accountable according to applicable laws.

Keywords

Authentic Deed Nominee Agreement Ownership Rights

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Trayama, Y., & Adhari, A. (2025). Evidence of Authentic Deeds in Civil Disputes Related to Nominee Agreements on Ownership of Land Title Certificates. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10550

References

  1. Adjie, H. (2023). Legal Study Regarding the Responsibilities of Notaries in Providing Social Services in Accordance with the Implementation of their Position. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), e1435–e1435. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1435
  2. Arifin, H. (2021). Legal Protection for Parties in Making Authentic Deeds from Legal Deviations by Notaries. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.3.802-809
  3. Demak, A. A. K. (2024). The Strength of Notarial Deed Proof as Evidence in the Civil Court Process. Tabellius: Journal of Law, 2(1), Article 1.
  4. Haspada, D. (2018). Perjanjian Nominee Antara Warga Negara Asing dengan Warga Negara Indonesia dalam Praktik Jual Beli Tanah Hak Milik yang Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 1313 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v17i2.77
  5. Hetharie, Y. (2022). Kepemilikan Tanah Oleh Warga Negara Asing Melalui Perjanjian Pinjam Nama Sebagai Bentuk Penyelundupan Hukum Dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional. Balobe Law Journal, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v2i1.822
  6. Hikmah, A. N., Cinta, B., J, Y. M. D., Fatikah, N., & Choirunnisa, N. A. (2023). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Pinjam Nama atas Kepemilikan Hak Tanah oleh WNA Berdasarkan Studi Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gin. Synergy: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(03), Article 03.
  7. Holidi, M. (2023). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik Dalam Proses Peradilan Perdata Pada Pengadilan Negri di Yogyakarta: The Power of Proof of Authentic Deeds in Civil Court Proceedings at the State Court in Yogyakarta. Juridica: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 4(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridicaugr.v4i2.220
  8. Irawan, W., Nasseri, J., & Marniati, F. S. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Akta Perjanjian Terkait Pinjam Nama (Nominee) oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) dalam Jual Beli Tanah Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. SentriI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), Article 6. https://ejournal.nusantaraglobal.or.id/index.php/sentri/article/view/2883
  9. Jastrawan, I. D. A. D., & Suyatna, I. N. (2019). Keabsahan Perjanjian Pinjam Nama (Nominee) oleh Warga Negara Asing dalam Penguasaan Hak Milik atas Tanah di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24843/KM.2019.v07.i02.p13
  10. Lubis, R., Bastari, Barus, U. M., & Maria. (2022). Juridical Review Process of Land Selling That Was Conducted in Bad Intention: (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1545K/Pdt/2019). Legal Brief, 11(5), Article 5.
  11. Moertiono, R. J. (2022). The Role of the Notary in Making Authentic Deed on the Change of Name Identity. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v24i2.35238
  12. Nainggolan, S. D. P., Rahman, K., Sridjaja, A., & Sinambela, J. (2023). Kedudukan Akta yang Dikeluarkan oleh Notaris yang Sedang dalam Masa Tahanan. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2573
  13. Nathanael, M., Djaja, B., & Sudirman, M. (2024). Legal Consequences of Authentic Deed with False Identity Against Notary. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2576–2583. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.838
  14. Noer, Z., & Basid, A. (2024). Notary’s Responsibility For Deeds Signed Without The Presence Of Witneseses. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i1.5958
  15. Paulinah, P., Qamariyanti, Y., & Faishal, A. (2022). Penguasaan Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing melalui Perjanjian Nominee di Indonesia. Banua Law Review, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32801/balrev.v4i1.36
  16. Rani, A. S. R. (2024). Notary’s Liability for Nominee Agreement on The Ownership of Land Rights by Foreigners in Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 11(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v11i2.12763
  17. Romadhan, M. R. R., & Suprapti, D. D. (2024). Actio Pauliana in Bankruptcy Cases and Their Legal Effects (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 388 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014). Annual Review of Legal Studies, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/arls.vol1i2.4096
  18. Saraswati, D., & Ratna, E. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Hasil Pelepasan Hak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1337 K/Pdt/2021). Notarius, 17(1), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i1.48460
  19. Sari, D. P. (2019). Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.323-352
  20. Septianingsih, K. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2020.336-340
  21. Sinaga, N. E., Wahliati, L., Gunawan, M., Erniyanti, E., & Respationo, S. (2024). The Evidentiary Strength of Authentic Deeds in Civil Disputes Involving Nominee Agreements. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v2i4.956
  22. Widiyono, T., & Khan, M. Z. K. (2023). Legal Certainty in Land Rights Acquisition in Indonesia’s National Land Law. Law Reform, 19(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.48393
  23. Zaelani, I. (2024). Responsibility and Important Role of Notary in Ensuring the Validity of Land Sale and Purchase Deeds. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v22i1.13888