Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 8, 2025
Accepted
Jun 6, 2025
Published
Jun 13, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 49 Download : 9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Aceh’s legal framework is distinctive due to the coexistence of state law, Islamic law, and adat (customary) law, particularly in handling marital disputes. Adat institutions hold a significant role within local communities, as they provide culturally grounded mechanisms for resolving conflicts, often emphasizing restorative justice and social harmony. However, the precise legal authority of these institutions remains complex, especially when their jurisdiction overlaps or conflicts with formal judicial bodies such as the Mahkamah Syar’iyah. This study aims to critically review the legal basis and scope of authority of adat institutions in resolving marital disputes in Aceh within the context of Indonesian law. Utilizing a normative legal research method combined with conceptual and statutory analyses, this research examines relevant legislation, including Law No. 11 of 2006 on the Governance of Aceh and Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. Additionally, it draws on doctrinal sources and practical adat dispute resolution cases in Aceh. The findings demonstrate that adat institutions remain trusted mediators that prioritize reconciliation and community consensus in marital conflicts. Nonetheless, their authority is not absolute and is limited by national legal frameworks, especially concerning divorce proceedings, child custody, and cases of domestic violence, which fall under the jurisdiction of Islamic courts. This overlapping jurisdiction can lead to legal ambiguities and inconsistent outcomes. The study contributes valuable insights for policymakers and legal practitioners seeking to enhance coordination and integration between adat dispute resolution mechanisms and formal legal systems. Strengthening regulatory clarity and fostering collaboration can support more effective dispute resolution that respects Acehnese cultural traditions while aligning with national legal standards.

Keywords

Adat Institutions Absolute Competence Legal Pluralism Marital dispute

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Zubir, Z., & Alimuddin, A. (2025). The Authority of Adat Institutions in Resolving Marital Disputes in Aceh: A Legal Review. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 12(1), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v12i1.11149

References

  1. Abdullah, Abdullah, Hijrah Hijrah, and Hery Zarkasih. “Criticizing the Muslim Divorce Tradition in Lombok: An Effort to Control the Women’s Rights.” Justicia Islamica 19, no. 1 (June 26, 2022): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.3168.
  2. Amalia, Nanda, Mukhlis Mukhlis, and Yusrizal Yusrizal. “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Peradilan Adat Di Aceh.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 1 (January 2018): 159–79. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art8.
  3. Azwir, Azwir, Pagar Pagar, and Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution. “The Legality of Divorce in Aceh: A Study of Divorce Practices Out of Religious Courts.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 16, no. 2 (November 25, 2022): 165–80. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6389.
  4. Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. “Introduction to Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY, November 22, 2005. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1511112.
  5. Djawas, Mursyid, and Sri Astuti Abdul Samad. “Conflict, Traditional, and Family Resistance: The Pattern of Dispute Resolution in Acehnese Community According to Islamic Law.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.5271.
  6. Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media, 2018.
  7. Hadi, Amirul. Amirul Hadi, Islam and State in Sumatra: A Study of Seventeenth-Century Aceh. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
  8. Hanafi, Syawaluddin. “Legal Politics of Changes to Marriage Laws in Indonesia.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 11, no. 1 (July 22, 2024): 68–85. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8867.
  9. Hedi, Fathol, Abdul Ghofur Anshori, and Harun Harun. “Legal Policy of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 3, no. 3 (December 26, 2017): 263–76. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i3.1297.
  10. Husain, Husain, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Taqyuddin Kadir, Tajuddin Noor, and Edy Saputra. “Legal Discovery of Religious Court Judges in Marriage Itsbat Cases: An Effort to Reform Marriage Law in Indonesia.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 11, no. 2 (October 1, 2024): 158–75. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i2.8996.
  11. Idri, Idri. “Religious Court in Indonesia: History and Prospect.” JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM 3, no. 2 (December 1, 2009): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2009.3.2.297-313.
  12. Jahwa, Elvina, Desi Pitriani Siregar, M. Riski Harahap, Ihsan Mubarak, and Ali Akbar. “Konsep Perkawinan Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Nasional Di Indonesia.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 1 (January 9, 2024): 1692–1705. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8080.
  13. Kamaruzzaman, Kamaruzzaman. “Relasi Islam Dan Politik Dalam Sejarah Politik Aceh Abad 16-17.” Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 16, no. 2 (October 28, 2016): 273. https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v16i2.494.
  14. Karim Faiz, Abd., Zulfahmi Ar, and Ahmad Izzuddin. “Between State Law and Islamic Law: The Practice of Divorce Outside the Situbondo Religious Courts, Indonesia.” JIL: Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 2 (August 31, 2022): 176–92. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.848.
  15. Maimun, Maimun. “The Women’s Rights in Divorce and Gender Equality Discourse in The Dynamics of Divorce in Madura.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 468–92. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.12804.
  16. Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin, Sulaiman Sulaiman, and Hasbi Ali. “Adat Court in Aceh, Indonesia: A Review of Law.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 8, no. 2 (May 30, 2020): 423–42. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i2.443.
  17. Marzuki. Metodologi Riset. Yogyakarta: Prasetia Widya Pratama, 2022.
  18. Muhsin. Interview with the head of the Religious Affairs Office of Langsa City, 2022.
  19. Musawwamah, Siti. “Divorcing Husbands as a Solution to Protect Women’s Dignity: A Case Study of Domestic Violence at Madura Religious Court.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 997–1021. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.14929.
  20. Nisa, Eva F. “The Bureaucratization of Muslim Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 33, no. 2 (August 2018): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2018.28.
  21. Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Muslim Women in Indonesian Religious Courts.” Islamic Law and Society 20, no. 3 (2013): 242–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0010A0003.
  22. Ramli, Misran, Syamsul Rijal, Reni Surya, and Irhamni Malika. “State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Minor Dispute Resolution in the Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 (May 21, 2024): 872–90. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.15924.
  23. Rohman, Abdur, and Ita Rahmania Kusumawati. “Penerapan Undang-Undang Batas Minimal Usia Perkawinan Dan Dampaknya Dalam Masyarakat:” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 9, no. 2 (December 6, 2022): 377–93. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v9i2.5059.
  24. Salim, Arskal. “Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 529–51. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082.
  25. ———. “Dynamic Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Contested Legal Orders in Contemporary Aceh.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42, no. 61 (January 2010): 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756640.
  26. ———. “‘Sharia from below’ in ACEH (1930s–1960s): Islamic Identity and the Right to Self‐determination with Comparative Reference to the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).” Indonesia and the Malay World 32, no. 92 (March 2004): 85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363981042000263471.
  27. Srimulyani, Eka. “Islam, Adat, and the State: Matrifocality in Aceh Revisited.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 48, no. 2 (December 18, 2010): 323. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2010.482.321-342.
  28. Suwandi, and Barowi. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
  29. Wijayati, Mufliha, Irwan Abdullah, Sally White, Aden Rosadi, Ade Yamin, and Yuniar Galuh Larasati. “Justice Brokers: Women’s Experiences with Injustice and Dependence in the Divorce Process.” Edited by Kevin Cheng. Cogent Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 1966208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1966208.
  30. Zainuddin, Muslim, Mansari Mansari, and Nadhilah Filzah. “Divorce Problems and Community Social Capital in Realizing Family Resilience in Aceh.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 914–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15080.
  31. Zainuddin, Zainuddin, and Zaki Ulya. “Recording Siri’s Marriages In Obtaining Legal Certainty (Reflections on the rise of Siri marriages in Aceh).” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 21, no. 1 (March 22, 2021): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v1i1.3276.
  32. Zulfi Diane Zaini. “Implementasi Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif Dan Pendekatan Normatif Sosiologis Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.” Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (July 31, 2011): 117–19.