Main Article Content

Abstract

Islam regards marriage as an act of worship that guides believers toward a balance between simplicity and moral responsibility. However, in modern social practice, there is a growing gap between the Islamic principle of simplicity and the rising costs of marriage, such as expensive dowries and lavish wedding ceremonies, which shift the values of maqasid al-shariah toward a materialistic culture. This study aims to analyze Wahbah al-Zuhaili’s thought on the allocation of marriage expenses from the perspective of maqasid al-shariah and its relevance to contemporary social practices. This research employs a qualitative library-based approach with descriptive-analytical methods. The primary sources include the works of Wahbah al-Zuhaili, particularly al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, along with relevant classical fiqh literature and contemporary studies. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify the legal principles underlying marriage financing within the framework of maqasid al-shariah. The findings reveal that Wahbah al-Zuhaili’s legal framework makes a significant contribution to the development of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence by integrating maqasid al-shariah into the discourse on marriage financing. His emphasis on simplicity, justice, and public welfare provides a practical direction for developing an efficient marriage system through community support, the role of zakat institutions, and state facilitation. These findings imply the formulation of social guidelines and religious policy recommendations aimed at reducing the economic burden of marriage without neglecting its spiritual values.

Keywords

Marriage Financing Maqashid al-Shariah Wahbah az-Zuhaili

Article Details

How to Cite
Yazid, I. M., Masduki, M., & Mawardi, M. (2025). Marriage Financing in Islamic Law: A Maqasid al-Shariah Analysis of Wahbah al-Zuhaili’s Thought. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 12(2), 568-588. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v12i2.12627

References

  1. Amania, Malinda Hafizaturrizqo, and Gusti Muzainah. “Review of the Marriage Law on Wahbah Zuhaili’s Views on Misyar Marriage.” Journal of Islamic and Law Studies 7, no. 2 (2023): 256–70. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v7i2.12178.
  2. Awaliyah, Fadilah, Jumni Nelli, and Hendri Sayuti. “Studi Analisis Pergeseran Nilai Mahar Perkawinan Menurut Wahbah Al-Zuhaili.” Jurnal Syntax Admiration 5, no. 7 (2024): 2811–24. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i7.1391.
  3. Azmi, Awalul, and Ahmad Sabeni. “Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam dalam Membentuk Pola Hidup Sederhana di Madin Al-Isnaini Montong Wasi Tahun 2020.” Khatulistiwa 1, no. 2 (2020): 75–88.
  4. Azzam, Abdil Aziz Muhammad, and Abdul Wahhab Sayyed Hawwas. Fikih Munakahat: Khitbah, Nikah, dan Talak. Cet. 4. Amzah, 2015.
  5. Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh. Vol. IV. Dar Al-Fikr, 1997.
  6. Bukhari, Ach Baidlawi, and Ahmad Bustanil Arifin. “Tingginya Biaya Pernikahan dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Keputusan Menikah Milenial.” Asa: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam 7, no. 1 (2025): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.58293/asa.v7i1.126.
  7. Chowdhury, Shyamal, Debdulal Mallick, and Prabal Roy Chowdhury. “Natural Shocks and Marriage Markets: Fluctuations in Mehr and Dowry in Muslim Marriages.” European Economic Review 128 (September 2020): 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103510.
  8. Herlinda, Iis, Sitti Halimang, and Jabal Nur. “Tradisi Berutang dalam Memenuhi Biaya Perkawinan Suku Tolaki Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syariah.” Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 13–25.
  9. Hidayat, Riyan Erwin. “Studi Pemikiran Wahbah Al-Zuhaili dan Muhammad Syahrur tentang Pernikahan serta Relevansinya dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan di Indonesia.” Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum 16, no. 1 (2019): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v16i1.1442.
  10. Hidayat, Riyan Erwin, Moelki Fahmi Ardliansyah, and Musyaffa Amin Ash Shabah. “Mahar Perspektif Ulama Kontemporer (Studi atas Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur dan Wahbah Az-Zuhaili).” Maslahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perbankan Syariah 13, no. 1 (2022): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33558/maslahah.v13i1.3513.
  11. Hidayat, Taufiq, Raihanah Azahari, and Fauzi Fauzi. “Jeulame in Marriage in Banda Aceh: Looking for a Common Thread between Culture and Sharia.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 20, no. 1 (2020): 115–30. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.563.
  12. Hidayat, Wildan. “Modernitas Penafsiran Al-Qur’an (Metodologi Tafsir Al-Munir Karya Wahbah Al-Zuhaili).” Cross-Border 6, no. 1 (2023): 283–304.
  13. Hirza, Ghifari, Sudirman Hasan, and Abd Rouf. “Cryptocurrency as Marriage Dower from the Perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah Jasser Auda.” Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam 14, no. 1 (2025): 103–19. https://doi.org/10.30651/mqs.v14i1.26167.
  14. Jasmiati, Jasmiati. “Pemikiran Imam Malik tentang Kedudukan Mahar dalam Pernikahan.” Hukumah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2024): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.55403/hukumah.v6i2.576.
  15. Majid, Zamakhsyari Abdul, and Mumun Mulyati. “Problematika Pendidikan Moderasi dalam Pemikiran Wahbah Al-Zuhaili.” Almarhalah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 6, no. 2 (2022): 220–30. https://doi.org/10.38153/almarhalah.v6i2.24.
  16. Makin, Makin, and Tri Wahyu Hidayati. “Mahar dalam Perspektif Yusuf Al-Qardhawi dan Relevansinya terhadap Praktik Sosial Pernikahan di Indonesia.” Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 3 (2025): 323–36. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v6i3.2170.
  17. Mughni, Nikita Khoirulia. “Makna Solidaritas Sosial pada Perkawinan Adat Lampung Sai Batin Tanjung Ratu, Lampung Selatan.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan 16, no. 1 (2025): 211–20.
  18. Muttaqin, Muhammad Ngizzul. “Resepsi Pernikahan (Antara Sakralitas Agama, Hukum, dan Tuntutan Adat).” Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v14i1.514.
  19. Na’imah, Farida Ulvi, Moch Azis Qoharuddin, Mustaqim Makki, Sunaji, and Isnin Harianti. “The Level of Mahr in Marriage: A Comparative Analysis of the Perspectives of the Shafii Madhhab and the Hanafi Madhhab.” Vrispraak: International Journal of Law 7, no. 2 (2023): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.59689/vris.v7i2.1148.
  20. Negara, Muhammad Abduh. “Talfiq Mazhab dan Kebutuhannya dalam Fatwa Kontemporer (Telaah atas Pandangan Wahbah al-Zuhaili).” Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2024): 343–58. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v5i2.1679.
  21. Permata, Maulin, Nurliana Damanik, and Munandar Munandar. “Analisis Takhrij dan Pemahaman Hadis tentang Mahar yang Ringan.” Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama 8, no. 2 (2025): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v8i2.4086.
  22. Puyu, Darsul S., Subehan Khalik Umar, Hasdin Hanis, Bustanul Arifin, and Muhammad Abili. “Mansai in the Marriage Tradition of the Banggai Ethnic in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia: A Living Sunnah Perspective.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (2023): 1352–72. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.16510.
  23. Rambe, Rachmat Husein, Faisar Ananda, and Irwansyah. “The Marriage Prohibitions.” Tofedu: The Future of Education Journal 4, no. 1 (2025): 341–46. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i1.441.
  24. Rasyid, Yanuriansyah Ar, Fahruddin Aziz, Djamaludin Djamaludin, and Putri Rohmaning Tyas. “Reconstructing the Concept of Uang Panai in South Sulawesi: A Maqasid al-Shariah Approach for Revitalizing Women-Friendly Islamic Values.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v9i1.8706.
  25. Rifqi, Muhammad Jazil, Nurul Asiya Nadhifah, Mukhammad Nur Hadi, Abdul Basith Junaidy, and Agus Solikin. “Children’s Legal Identity at Stake: Reconstructing Maqasid al-Syariah through Marriage Isbat Applications by the Second Generation in Pasuruan.” El-Mashlahah 15, no. 1 (2025): 125–48. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i1.9068.
  26. Robiansyah, Dodi, Burhan Lukman Syah, Alip Eko Pasetyo, and Aqila Najiha Mohd Afandi. “Excessive Lifestyle According to Al-Munir Tafsir by Wahbah al-Zuhaili.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 2, no. 1 (2023): 18–43. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i1.1278.
  27. Saiin, Asrizal, Mohamad Azmi Karuok, Moh Zaidi Hajazi, and Anwar M. Radiamoda. “Examining Malay Customary Marriage Law in the Malay Countries: An Urf Perspective.” Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan 10, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v10i1.4725.
  28. Sayuti, Nur Maizaitul Azerah Binti Mohd, and Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip. “Pengaruh Tingginya Uang Hantaran Perkawinan terhadap Penundaan Perkawinan di Desa Temerloh, Negeri Pahang Malaysia Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences 6, no. 1 (2023): 56–75. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1715.
  29. Shiddieqy, Ahmad Ash, Akhmad Roja Badrus Zaman, Sumayyah Faqihah, Muhammad Nur Fathoni, and Dinda Difia Madina. “Integrating Islamic Family Law and Gender Equality: A Comparative Study of Legal Reform and Social Norms in Contemporary Indonesia and Morocco.” Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 7, no. 2 (2025): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.33367/legitima.v7i2.7101.
  30. Sulfa, Nafilah, and Nafilatul Khair. “Konsep Mahar dalam Surah An-Nisa Ayat 4: Pendekatan Maqasid Al-Quran dalam Perspektif Rasyid Ridha.” Al Karima: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir 9, no. 1 (2025): 92–109. https://doi.org/10.58438/alkarima.v9i1.303.
  31. Wahyudi, and Istikomah. “Toleransi Antar Mazhab Perspektif Wahbah Az-Zuhayli dalam Kitab At-Tafsir al-Munir fi Aqidah wa Ash-Shariah wa al-Manhaj.” Tadayyun: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 2 (2024): 149–70.
  32. Winario, Mohd. “Esensi dan Standardisasi Mahar Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” Jurnal Al Himayah 4, no. 1 (2020): 69–89.
  33. Yusuf, Nasruddin, Nurlaila Harun, Syarifuddin, and Salma Mursyid. “Examining the Basis of Maqashid Syariah in Renewal of Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah 9, no. 1 (2024): 357–75. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.258.
  34. Zulaifi. “Konsep Mahar Menurut Pemikiran Ulama Empat Mazhab dan Relevansinya di Era Kontemporer.” Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming 16, no. 2 (2022): 105–20. https://doi.org/10.20414/qawwam.v16i2.5348.