Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 16, 2020
Accepted
Jul 3, 2021
Published
Jul 14, 2021
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1347 Download : 3043

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Traditionally, there are 3 (three) Batak marriage systems, namely; exogamy, endogamy, and electrograms. Based on these three types, clan marriage is a marriage that is prohibited in Batak customs and culture. Semarga is a condition where one individual and another individual has a blood lineage through the father's line. Family marriages carried out by the Batak Mandailing migrant community in Yogyakarta experienced a shift in meaning from the traditional Batak culture, from an exogamous marriage system to an eleutherogamous marriage system that does not recognize any prohibitions as is the case in the exogamous or endogamous marriage system. The article is field research with a qualitative approach. The method of data collection was carried out by field observations and conducting interviews with informants. The primary sources in this paper are the Mandailing Batak people who marry within the same clan. In addition, interview data were also obtained for traditional leaders, religious leaders, intellectuals, and the surrounding community. The results of the study concluded; Factors that affect clan marriages in the Batak Mandailing migrant community are due to love factors, religious factors, economic factors, educational factors, and cultural factors. Family marriages in the Batak Mandailing migrant community are carried out because the migrant Batak Mandailing community does not believe in taboo things that are local wisdom.

Keywords

Marriage Semarga Mandailing Batak Society Migrants

Article Details

How to Cite
Pohan, M. (2021). Fenomena dan Faktor Perkawinan Semarga . Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 8(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v8i1.2088

References

  1. Asmaniar, Asmaniar. “Perkawinan Adat Minangkabau.” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 131–40. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.23.
  2. Azka. A. M, A. Millati. “Tradisi Rebu Ngerana Pasca Perkawinan Pada Masyarakat Karo Sumatera Utara Perspektif ‘Urf.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 7, no. 2 (2020): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v7i2.1962.
  3. Basri, Rusdaya. “Pernikahan Sedarah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Kliping, 2019, 1. http://www.iainpare.ac.id/pernikahan-sedarah-dalam-perspektif-hukum-islam/.
  4. Depag, RI. “Alquran Pdf Terjemahan.” Al-Qur’an Terjemahan, 2007, 1–1100.
  5. Hafas, Imam. “Pandangan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Terhadap” 7, no. 1 (2020): 16–28.
  6. Hermanto, Agus. “Larangan Perkawinan Perspektif Fikih Dan Relevansinya Dengan Peraturan Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Asas 10, no. 02 (2019): 153–75. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v10i02.4538.
  7. Hidayat, Hidayat, and Erond L. Damanik. “Batak Dan Bukan Batak: Paradigma Sosiohistoris Tentang Konstruksi Identitas Etnik Di Kota Medan, 1906-1939.” Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha 3, no. 2 (2018): 71. https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v3i2.19624.
  8. Janah, Nasitotul. “Nurcholish Madjid Dan Pemikirannya (Diantara Kontribusi Dan Kontroversi).” Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 1 (2017): 44–63. https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v12i1.1655.
  9. Jayus, Jaja Ahmad. “Eksistensi Pewarisan Hukum Adat Batak.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 2 (2019): 235. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.384.
  10. Kafaabillah, Dita. “Nama Marga Sebagai Identitas Budaya Masyarakat Etnis Arab.” Litera 17, no. 2 (2018): 175–85. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i2.18364.
  11. Lestari, Novita. “Problematika Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 4, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v4i1.1009.
  12. Mas’ad, Mas’ad, Muhammad Nizaar, and Faridatul Aini. “Mengidentifikasi Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Peningkatan Migrasi Internasional Di Desa Mekar Damai Kecamatan Praya Kabupaten Lombok Tengah Tahun 2015.” Paedagoria | FKIP UMMat 7, no. 1 (2018): 31. https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v7i1.178.
  13. Noveria, Mita. “Migrasi Berulang Tenaga Kerja Migran Internasional: Kasus Pekerja Migran Asal Desa Sukorejo Wetan, Kabupaten Tulungagung.” Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia 12, no. 1 (2017): 25. https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v12i1.255.
  14. Nugroho, Sigit Sapto. Pengantar Hukum Adat Indonesia. Alumni, Bandung, 2016.
  15. Nurnazli. “Wawasan Al-Qur’an Tentang Anjuran Pernikahan.” Ijtima’iyya 8, no. 2 (2015): 57–75.
  16. Parapat, Lili Herawati, & Deninna, Riskiana Aritonang, Universitas Muhammadiyah, Tapanuli Selatan, and Padangsidimpuan Abstrak. “Nilai Budaya Lokal ‘ Pemberian Marga’ Di Desa Paringgonan Dalam Prespektif Semantik Sebagai Bahan Ajar Sastra.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra 4, no. 2 (2019).
  17. Pranata, Billy, Yonata Laia, and Marulitua Lumban Gaol. “Perancangan Sistem Penyusunan Marga Suku Batak Toba Berbasis Web.” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer Prima(JUSIKOM PRIMA) 3, no. 1 (2019): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.34012/jusikom.v3i1.565.
  18. Putra, Dedisyah. “Tradisi Markobar Dalam Pernikahan Adat Mandailing Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” El Ahli: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam I, no. 2 (2020): 1–16.
  19. Ridwan, Drs, Melay M Hum, and Drs Kamaruddin M Si. “History Of The Entry Mandailing Ethnic Into Rokan Hulu Regency Year 1935-1945 Sejarah Masuknya Suku Mandailing Ke Kabupaten Rokan Hulu TahuN 1935-1945,” 1945, 1–13.
  20. Rita, Ruth, and Simon Simon. “Perspektif Alkitab Terhadap Pernikahan Semarga.” Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Musik Gereja 4, no. 2 (2020): 216–35. https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v4i2.159.
  21. Rodin, Rhoni, and Ade Dwi Nurrizqi. “Tingkat Literasi Digital Mahasiswa Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan Dalam Pemanfaatan E-Resources UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.” Pustakaloka 12, no. 1 (2020): 72–89. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v12i1.1935.
  22. Santoso. “Hakekat Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Adat.” Yudisia 7, no. 2 (2016): 412–34.
  23. Shamad, Muhammad Yunus. “Hukum Pernikahan Dalam Islam.” Istiqra’ 5, no. September (2017): 74–77.
  24. Sintyaa, Elya, Mohammad Na’imb, and ͨ Rully Putri Nirmala Puji. “Developing Youtube Audio Visual Learning Media Of Hindu- Buddhist Sites In Banyuwangi For The History Learning In Grade X Of High SchooL Elya.” Jurnal Historica ISSN No. 2252-4673 Volume 3, no. 2252 (2019): 64–77.
  25. Susanti, Eka. “Nilai-Nilai Budaya Batak Toba Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Ips Dan Proses Pengembangan Wawasan Kebangsaan” I, no. 1 (2015).
  26. Tualeka, M. Wahid Nur. “Teori Konflik Sosiologi Klasik Dan Modern.” Al-Hikmah 3, no. 1 (2017): 32–48. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Ah/article/view/409.
  27. Wahyuni, Aguswita, and Nurman Nurman. “Dampak Perkawinan Adat Antar Etnis Mandailing Dengan Etnis Minangkabau Terhadap Kekerabatan Dan Hak Waris Anak Di Kabupaten Pasaman.” Journal of Civic Education 2, no. 5 (2019): 380–89. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v2i5.279.
  28. Yudowibowo, Syafrudin. “Tinjauan Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia Terhadap Konsep Kafa’Ah Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Islam.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2012): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10632.
  29. Zulham Siregar. “Sejarah Suku Mandailing Di Kecamatan Bandar.” JBS (Jurnal Berbasis Sosial) Pendidikan IPS STKIP Al Maksum 1, no. 1 (2020): 10–16. https://jurnal.stkipalmaksum.ac.id/index.php/jbs.