Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 6, 2022
Accepted
May 13, 2022
Published
Aug 2, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 742 Download : 1450

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The panel of judges rejected the demands for a wife and children's financial support in the decision Number 251/Pdt.G/2021/MS.Mbo. Whereas a living that is not given during the marriage becomes a debt for the husband who has the right to be demanded back by the wife. This study aims to analyze the reasons for the judge's refusal to support his wife and children and the legal consequences of the refusal. The author uses a normative juridical research method. The legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively. The results showed that the judge's consideration of rejecting the demand for a living was because only one witness from the two people who were presented to the trial was able to state that the defendant had never provided a living for his wife or children. The principle regulated in the procedural law is unus testis nullus testis which means one witness is not a witness. Juridically, the refusal of a living was appropriate because the panel of judges had taken into account the provisions of Article 172 of the HIR which stipulates that witness statements must match each other.

Keywords

Past Life Children Evidence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mansari, Sari, E., & Abdul Muthalib, S. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penolakan Nafkah Madhiah Isteri Dan Anak. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 9(2), 306-322. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v9i2.3903

References

  1. Abdullah, Erfani Aljan. Pembaharuan Hukum Perdata Islam Praktik Dan Gagasan. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.
  2. Asikin, Zainal. Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
  3. Asnawi, M. Natsir. Dekonstruksi Hukum Jejak-Jejak Penafsiran Dan Pembentukan Norma Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Magnum Pustaka Utama, 2021.
  4. ———. Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim Pendekatan Multidisipliner Dalam Memahami Putusan Peradilan Perdata. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.
  5. ———. Hukum Acara Perdata Teori, Praktik Dan Permasalahannya Di Peradilan Umum Dan Peradilan Agama. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019.
  6. ———. M. Natsir Asnawi, Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Kajian Konstekstual Mengenai Sistem, Asas, Prinsip, Pembebanan Dan Standar Pembuktian. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.
  7. ———. Penemuan Hukum Di Peradilan Agama Perkembangan Norma Dan Praktik Terbaik. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.
  8. Bakhri, Syaiful. Dinamika Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Capaian Keadilan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  9. ———. Dinamika Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Capaian Keadilan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  10. Erwin, Hikmatiar. “Nafkah Iddah Pada Perkara Cerai Gugat.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 1 (2018).
  11. Hasanuddin, Nor. Penerapan Metode Proporsional Dalam Menentukan Jumlah Mut’ah, Nafkah Isteri Dan Nafkah Anak Pada Peradilan Agama, Dalam Penemuan Hukum Di Peradilan Agama Perkembangan Norma Dan Praktik Terbaik. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2020.
  12. Ihwanudin, Nandang. “Pemenuhan Kewajiban Pasca Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Adliya: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 10, no. 1 (2016): 2016.
  13. Mansari, Fatahillah Zahrul; “Penetapan Nafkah ‘Iddah Melalui Hak Ex Officio Bagi Istri Nusyuz.” Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 2 (2021): 271–90. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i2.432.
  14. Moriyanti, Mansari; Perlindungan Perempuan Dan Anak Melalui Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Antara Keadilan, Kemanfaatan Dan Kepastian Hukum. Banda Aceh: Bravo Darussalam, 2019.
  15. Purwanti, Delvi. “Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Kewajiban Suami Terhadap Isteri Perspektif Hukum Islam (Analisis Putusan Perkara Nomor: 0677/Pdt. G/2016/PA. Bn),” no. 48 (2018): 2018.
  16. Rizal, Muhammad. “AL-AHKAM : Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Peradilan Islam Vol 1 No. 2 Tahun 2021.” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Peradilan Islam 1, no. 2 (2021): 101–19.
  17. Rizkal, Hanik Harianti; Mansari; “SENSITIVITAS HAKIM TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK ISTERI DALAM KASUS CERAI GUGAT (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh Nomor 157 ….” … : Media Ilmu Syari’ah … 4, no. 01 (2021): 47–67.
  18. Roni, Muhammad, and M. Anzaikhan. “Pembentukan Keluarga Shaleh Dalam Komunikasi Islam: Studi Komparasi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” AL-HIKMAH: Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Budaya 12, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.32505/hikmah.v12i1.2825.
  19. Soraya Devy, Mansari. “PROBLEMATIKA BIAYA PEMELIHARAAN ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN VERSTEK DI MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH BANDA ACEH.” Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies 2, no. 1 (2016): 63–76.
  20. Suadi, Amran. Sosiologi Hukum Penegakan, Realitas & Nilai Moralitas Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.
  21. Sufrizal, and M Anzaikhan. “Pernikahan Sedarah dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Legalite: Jurnal Perundang-undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam 5, no. 2 (2020): 130–49. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i2.2782.