Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 31, 2022
Accepted
Dec 4, 2022
Published
Dec 13, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 50 Download : 100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the views of the Syafi'iyah clerics on the concept of kafāah; this is important to discuss because so far, in the opinion of the general public and especially Aceh, kafāah is only limited to equivalence in the field of religion. In contrast, in other fields, its existence is ignored. This research methodology uses normative juridical with a literature review; then, the descriptive analysis is used to describe the collected data that has been reduced; the primary data in this study are the works of Syafi'iyyah scholars. As for the findings of the study; the conception of kafāah in Acehnese society only focuses on conformity in terms of religion because this is the most basic right of a marriage, without having to fulfil other fields of kafāah, while in the view of Syafi'iyah scholars, religion is the main requirement of kafāah, but other aspects of kafāah must also be considered and are as important as the religious side, such as; heredity, occupation and no defects experienced by the prospective husband which can occur faskh, and all the standardization of kafaah become a condition for the validity of the marriage under certain conditions

Keywords

kafāah marriage scholars

Article Details

How to Cite
T. Wildan, T. W. (2022). Islamic Law Thought. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 9(2), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v9i2.4985

References

  1. ‘Alī, Ibrāhīm bin. Takmilat Al-Majmū’ Syarẖ Al-Muhadzdzab. Jld. 19. Bairut: Daar al-Ma’arif, 2007.
  2. Abdullah. “Interview a Religious Leader and Member of the MPU (Ulema Consultative Assembly).” Aceh Utara, 2022.
  3. Ahmad Muzakki, and Himami Hafshawati. “Kedudukan Dan Standarisasi Kafaah Dalam Pernikahan Perspektif Ulama Madzhab Empat.” Asy-Syari’ah : Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55210/assyariah.v7i1.429.
  4. Al-Bukhari, Abu Abdullah Muhammad Ibn Ismail. “Sahih Al-Bukhari.” In Al Jami’ Al Musnad as Shahih, 150–51. Dar at-ta’shil, 2002.
  5. Al-Hād, Muhammad bin ‘Abd. Hāsyiyat Al-Sanadī. Makkah: Dar as Syuruq, 2003.
  6. Al-Haitami, Ibnu Hajar. Tuhfatul Muhtaj Bi Syarh Al-Minhaj. Juz VI. Kairo: Maktabah At-Tijariyah Al-Kubra, 1994.
  7. Al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman. Fiqh Al-Madzahib Al-’Arba’ah. Bairut: Daar al-Fikr, 1998.
  8. al-Malibari, Zainuddin bin Abdul Aziz. Fathul-Mu’in Bi Syarhi Quratul-‘Aini. Bairut: Daar al-Ma’arif, 2001.
  9. Al-Muslim, Abu Husain Muslim bin Al Hajjaj. Shahih Muslim. Bairut: Daar al-Fikr, 1918.
  10. Al-Nawawī, Muhyī al-Dīn. Al-Majmū’ Syaraẖ Al-Muhadzdzab. Libanon: Daar al-Ma’arif, 2001.
  11. ———. Raudhat Al-Thālibīn Wa ‘Umdat Al-Muftīn. Jld. V. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-Miyah, 2006.
  12. Al-Qulyūbī, Syihāb al-Dīn. Hāsyiyat Al-Qulyūbī Wa ‘Amīrah. Bairut: Daar al-Ma’arif, 2012.
  13. Al-Rāfi’ī, ‘Abd al-Karīm bin Muhammad. Al-Muẖarrar. Bairut: Daar al-Fikr, 2005.
  14. Al-Ramlī, Muhammad bin Abī ‘Abbās. Nihāyat Al-Muẖtāj Ilā Syarẖ Al-Minhāj. Jld. I. Bairut: Darul Kutub Ilmiyah, 2003.
  15. Al-Suyūthī. Al-Asybah Wa Al-Nadhair. Bairut: Daar al-Ma’arif, 2007.
  16. Al-Syarwānī, Abd al-Hamīd. Hawāsyī Al-Syarwānī Wa Ibn Qāsim Al-‘Ubādī ‘alā Tuhfat Al-Muhtāj. Bairut: Darul Kutub Ilmiyah, 2012.
  17. al-Zuhri, Muhammad. Sirāj Al-Wahhāj ‘alā Matn Al-Minhāj. Bairut: Daar al-Ma’arif, 1992.
  18. Ameliana, Dina, and Sheila Fakhria. “Kafa’ah Sebagai Barometer Pernikahan Menurut Madzhab Syafii.” Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 2 (2022): 136–53. https://doi.org/10.33367/legitima.v4i2.2565.
  19. Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
  20. Assegaf, Hasyim. Derita Putri-Putri Nabi Studi Historis Kafa’ah Syarifah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
  21. Aufal, Moch, Hadliq Khayyul, and Millati Waddin. “Konsep Kafa’ah Dalam Hukum Islam (Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Antara Imam Syafi’i Dalam Kitab Al -Umm Dan Imam Ibnu Hazm Dalam Kitab Al-Muhalla)” 3, no. 01 (2022): 61–84.
  22. Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Mesir: Maktabah al-Maarif, 1992.
  23. Bashori, Hasan, and Cipto Sembodo. “Relevansi Fatwa Mazhab Syafi’i Tentang Kufu Dalam Nikah Terhadap Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).” Ulumuddin : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2018): 99–114. https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v8i2.190.
  24. Chania, Dhea, and Syarifah Gustiawati Mukri. “Urgensi Kafaah Terhadap Keutuhan Rumah Tangga.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v5i1.939.
  25. Haryadi, Haryadi. “Kafaah: Implementasi Standar Pasangan Ideal Menurut Fikih Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Ijtihad 33, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15548/ijt.v33i1.21.
  26. Hasan, Abi. “Konsep Kafa’ah Dalam Perkawinan Dan Urgensinya Dalam Membina Rumah Tangga Menurut Fikih Mazhab.” Jurnal MEDIASAS: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah 3, no. 01 (2020): 1–20.
  27. Husain, Abdurrahman bin Muhammad. Bughyat Al-Mustarsyidīn. Mesir: Daar Nu’man li Ulum, 1998.
  28. Iqbal, Muhammad. “Interview a Religious Leader and Member of the MPU (Ulema Consultative Assembly).” Pidie Jaya, 2022.
  29. Ja’far. “Interview with a Religious Leader and Member of the MPU (Ulema Consultative Assembly).” Aceh Selatan, 2022.
  30. Kemendikbud. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Budaya, 2011.
  31. Khair, Yahyā bin Abī. Al-Bayān Fī Al-Madzhab Al-Imām Al-Syafi’ī. Jeddah: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 2002.
  32. Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Cet. XI. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.
  33. Muhtarom, Ali. “Problematika Konsep Kafaâ€TMah Dalam Fiqih (Kritik Dan Reinterpretasi).” JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM, 2018. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1739.
  34. Munawar, Ahmad Warson. “Kamus Arab Indonesia Al Munawir.” In Cetakan 14, 1997.
  35. Nurhanisah Hadigunawan, Rafeah Saidon, Mastura Razali, and Fatin Nabilah Wahid. “Kafaah: Impak Perbezaan Sosial Terhadap Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga.” Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 26, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol26no2.424.
  36. Ramelan, Rafida. “SEKUFU DALAM KONTEKS HUKUM KELUARGA MODERN.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam) 4, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v4i1.7560.
  37. Roslaili, Y. “Kajian ’Urf Tentang Adat Ranub Kong Haba Dan Akibat Pembatalannya Di Aceh (Study of’Urf’on The Custom of Ranub Kong Haba and Its Cancellation in Aceh).” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum …, 2019.
  38. Salahuddin. “Interview with a Religious Shop and Chair of the MPU (Ulema Consultative Assembly).” Kota Langsa, 2022.
  39. Shamad, Muhammad Yunus. “HUKUM PERNIKAHAN DALAM ISLAM (Wedding Law In Islam).” ISTIQRA’ V, no. September (2017).
  40. Sholihin, Shobirin. Hukum Pernikahan Islam. STISNU Nusantara Tangerang, 2018.
  41. Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Umum.” In Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2007.
  42. Sugiyono. Metode Peneltian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
  43. Syatha, Muhammad. Hasyiyat I’anat Al-Thalibin. Bairut: Daar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 2001.
  44. Yuliza. “Adat Perkawinan Dalam Masyarakat Aceh.” Al-Mabhats, Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Agama 5, no. 1 (2020).
  45. Zainuddin, Zainuddin, and Zaki Ulya. “Recording Siri’s Marriages In Obtaining Legal Certainty (Reflections on the Rise of Siri Marriages in Aceh).” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 21, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v1i1.3276.