Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 16, 2023
Accepted
Dec 18, 2023
Published
Dec 22, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 128 Download : 57

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The legal knowledge of penghulu on disability issues determines how to implement laws that advocate for persons with disabilities. This paper traces the legal paradigm of seven Penghulus in East Java who were newly inducted in 2022 against several articles in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) that touch on disability issues. Some of the themes tracked are marriage guardians (article 22), marriage witnesses (article 25), and polygamy (article 57). It is an empirical study using conceptual and philosophical approaches. This article finds that most young East Javanese penghulu still need an advocate interpretation paradigm because they read the articles authentically and grammatically, not sociologically or teleologically. The benefit (maslahah) aspect of these articles is also considered to look more authentic. Therefore, the argument of advocates for the rights of persons with a human rights perspective is not widely involved. As a result, persons with disabilities who are guardians of marriage, witnesses of marriage, and wives can become victims of neglect of fundamental civil rights in marriage. It is where the conservative paradigm of the young penghulu comes into being strong and dominant. The existence of the progressive paradigm is also buried and framed in the current conservative paradigm. This finding is certainly an important note about how the government indirectly shapes the contestation of conservative and progressive paradigms in family law.

Keywords

Legal Paradigm Marriage Penghulu Disability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nur Hadi, M., Ali Sabri, F., & Masum, A. (2023). Between Conservatism and Progressivism: The Young Penghulu in East Java’s Legal Paradigm Addresses Disability Issues in Marriage. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 10(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v10i2.7352

References

  1. Al-Bangkalaniy, Muhammad Khalil bin Abdu al-Lathif. “As-Silah Fi Bayan an-Nikah.” Surabaya, n.d.
  2. Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid bin Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Muhammad. Al-Wasit Fi Al-Madhhab. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2001.
  3. Al-Ḥaṣni, Taqiyyuddīn Abi Bakar bin Muḥammad. Kifayah Al-Akhyar Fi Halli Ghayah Al-Ikhtishar. 7th ed. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2013.
  4. Al-Khallaf, Abdul Wahab. ‘Ilmu Ushul Al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2010.
  5. Al-Khatib, Muhammad ash-Sharbani. Al-Iqna’ Fi Halli Alfazi Abi Syuja’. Semarang: Thaha Putra, n.d.
  6. Al-Khin, Mustofa, Mustofa Al-Bugho, and Ali Asy-Syarbaji. Al-Fiqh Al-Manhajiy ’ala Madhhab Al-Imam Ash-Shafi’iy. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam, 1992.
  7. Aminah, Shofa. “Studi Perbandingan Antara Mazhab Hanafi Dan Mazhab Syafi’i Tentang Saksi Perempuan Dalam Akad Nikah.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, 2016.
  8. Ansori, Fahmi Moh. “Peran Hasan Mustopa Dalam Lembaga Penghulu Di Priangan Masa Kolonial Belanda (1895-1918 M).” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2018.
  9. Ash-Shiraziy, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muhadhab Fi Fiqh Al-Imam Asy-Syafi’iy. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam, 1996.
  10. Astari, Asnidar. “Konsep Wali Nikah Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Gender.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2017.
  11. Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Ilmu Ushul Al-Fiqh Al-Islamiy. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1986.
  12. Elimartati, and Elfia. “Kritik Terhadap Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Ketentuan Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 19, no. 2 (2020): 231–43. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i2.2283.
  13. Fakhyadi, Defel. “Ptriarkisme Hukum Kewarisan Islam: Kritik Hukum Waris Islam Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Hukum Islam 21, no. 1 (2021): 6.
  14. Fridayanto, Pradika Kusuma. “Implementasi Konsep Keadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Karena Suami Hypersex.” Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, 2021.
  15. Hadi, Mukhammad Nur. “Conservatism on Islamic Legal Maxims: Judicial Interpretation of Polygamous Marriage at the Religious Courts of Mojokerto, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 2 (2023): 172–96. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i2.1637.
  16. ———. “Conservative Muslim on The Screen: The Narrative of Islamic Family Law in Indonesian Films” 18, no. 1 (2021): 133–45.
  17. ———. “Metode Ijtihad Kolektif Progresif Di Indonesia Sebagai Media Proyeksi Nalar Kemanusiaan.” Ma’mal 4, no. 2 (2023): 141–69.
  18. ———. “Nalar Fikih Penghulu Di Kota Malang Dalam Saksi Nikah Tuli.” Inklusi 8, no. 2 (2022): 169–84. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.080206.
  19. Islamiyah, Noviriani Nur, and Endang Supraptiningsih. “Tinjauan Dampak Psikologis Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia,” 614–19, 2013.
  20. Isma’il, Ibnu Qoyim. Kiai Penghulu Jawa: Peranannya Di Masa Kolonial. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1997.
  21. Khoirul Abror. “Poligami Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga (Studi Di Kelurahan Rajabasa Bandar Lampung).” Al-´Adalah 13, no. 2 (2016): 227–38.
  22. Kholifatul Fitria. “Hak Ijbar Wali Nikah Dalam Perspektif Gender.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2013.
  23. Maufur, ed. Fikih Dan HAM: Best Practices Pengarustamaan Hak Aaasi Manusia Dalam Kebebasan Beragama, Gender, Dan Hak Anak Di Lingkungan Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA). 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2019.
  24. Muyassaroh, Binti Sahlatun. “Pandangan Penghulu Kota Malang Terhadap Kedudukan Wali Washi Dalam Pernikahan.” Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2018.
  25. Nuroniyah, Wardah, Hukum Keluarga, Hukum Perkawinan, Ushul Fikih, and Hukum Islam. “Kritik Metodologis Terhadap Pembaruan Hukum Perkawinan Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (2016): 33–47.
  26. Purbaningrum, Fariska Dwi. “Penghulu-Penghulu Keraton: Peran Dan Konferensi Penghulu Bidang Agama, Hukum, Pendidikan Di Kasunanan Surakarta Dan Mangkunegaran Tahun 1936-1947.” Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, 2022.
  27. Rais, Halili. Penguhulu Di Antara Dua Otiritas Fikih Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Lingkaran, 2020.
  28. Rajafi, Ahmad. Nalar Fiqh Muhammad Quraish Shihab. Istana Publishing. Vol. 53. Yogyakarta: Istana Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3909325.
  29. Ro’fah. “Mengikis Bias Normalisme Dalam Fikih: Upaya Menuju Fikih Ramah Difabel.” In FIkih (Ramah) Difabel, edited by Ro’fah. Q-Media, 2015.
  30. Rosyadi, Imron. Rekonstruksi Epistemologi Hukum Keluarga Islam. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.
  31. Saputra, Megi. “Penghulu Wanita Menurut Penghulu Kantor Urusan Agama Kota Yogyakarta.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 11, no. 2 (2020): 97. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2018.11208.
  32. Sarifudin, Jaenal. “Problem Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dan Ketimpangan Relasi Keluarga.” In Fikih Humanis: Meneguhkan Keragaman, Membela Kesetaraan Dan Kemanusiaan, Noorhaidi., 305–34. Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2022.
  33. Sherry, Mark. “The Promise of Human Rights for Disabled and the Reality of Neoliberalism.” In Disability, Human Rights and the Limits of Humanitarianism, edited by Michale Gill and J. Chatty Schlund-Vials. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  34. Siregar, Sahlan Habibi. “Peran Penghulu Dalam Upaya Meminimalisir Tingkat Perceraian.” Jurnal Analisa Pemikiran Insan Cendekia 5, no. 2 (2022): 69–74.
  35. Siroj, Malthuf. Hukum Islam Progresif. Nucl. Phys. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Ilmu, 2021.
  36. Thalita, Malpha Della. “Studi Kasus Keluarga Poligami Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta” 16, no. 1 (2019): 184–97.
  37. Wahid, Marzuki. Fiqh Indonesia: Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Legal Draft Kompilasi Hukum Islam Indonesia Dalam Bingkai Politik Hukum Islam Indonesia. 1st ed. Bandung: Penerbit Marja, 2014.
  38. Wahid, Marzuki, and Rumadi. Fiqh Madzhab Negara: Kritik Atas Politik Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2011.
  39. Zaini, Ahmad. “Epistemologi Hukum Islam Ibnu Hazm Tentang Saksi Perempuan Dalam Pernikahan: Kesetaraan ‘Terbatas’ Status Hukum Perempuan.” Tesis, 2020, 1–137.